March 21, 2019, 12:51:55 AM

1,535,764 Posts in 46,067 Topics by 1,068 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


Not safe for work issue, new rules are in effect!

Started by reeper, October 09, 2007, 12:26:52 AM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

reeper

October 09, 2007, 12:26:52 AM Last Edit: October 09, 2007, 12:31:42 AM by reefer
You may finally post not safe for work content in any board as long as it applies to these rules:

- It must be legal: No child porn & no beastiality, some other laws will apply, if you have questions please ask or look them up before you post questionable content.

- You must be eighteen years old: if you're not eighteen, it's not legal for you to look at not safe for work images. Simple as that.

- You must post a warning and it must be in a spoiler tag: not everyone at the forum is eighteen, and not everyone at the forum has a computer in their room so you need to shield their eyes or their parent's eyes. If you don't know how to post pictures in a spoiler then you may not post not safe for work images, just because it's in a spoiler doesn't mean it is a warning, you must post a warning and it must be in a spoiler tag.

- It still must be on topic: putting porn in everything is going to get you banned.

Other rules and restrictions apply. In short: don't be a dumb ass.

iWolf


Magyarorszag


Sam

Quote from: reefer on October 09, 2007, 12:26:52 AM

- It still must be on topic: putting porn in everything is going to get you banned.


That line made me laugh for some reason. >.>

Probably because I have the ointelligence of a 9 year old, but whatever. :3
1.8mb is too huge for a sig nigga

Khadafi

Quote from: PHANTOM HOURGLASS on October 09, 2007, 12:25:36 PM
What about in the Chat Thread? navi;
No.


Also, if I see it being abused, by either not being placed in a tag with a warning, or just posted in any thread, then you will be banned on the spot and everyone will lose the privilege of NSFW content.

guff

Quote from: reefer on October 09, 2007, 12:26:52 AM
- You must post a warning and it must be in a spoiler tag
God fucking damn, spoilers are overused. psyduck;

also, not good for nsfw material, as i've explained several times in the past:
the images are still loaded, whether or not the user reveals them, there will still be a hit registered to the image

christing fuck just link to the images

Khadafi

Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 09, 2007, 05:03:24 PM
God fucking damn, spoilers are overused. psyduck;

also, not good for nsfw material, as i've explained several times in the past:
the images are still loaded, whether or not the user reveals them, there will still be a hit registered to the image

christing fuck just link to the images
That's too many requests for Lawlz to comprehend.  caterpie;

guff

Quote from: JMV290 on October 09, 2007, 05:07:12 PM
That's too many requests for Lawlz to comprehend.  caterpie;
okay but anyways that brings up another point:
next time lawlz posts a shock image to be funny will you ban him

Feynman



Infel

Quote from: Bassir C. on October 09, 2007, 07:07:05 PM
I LIKE THE LINKS IDEA
Seems pointless to me. you have to actually click to open the spoilers, even then.

Also, on a related note,  when the hell did H. Fantron become mod?

Magyarorszag

Quote from: Sinbad on October 13, 2007, 11:39:25 AM
Seems pointless to me. you have to actually click to open the spoilers, even then.

Also, on a related note,  when the hell did H. Fantron become mod?

I'm taking care of the PoTD. navi;

guff

Quote from: Sinbad on October 13, 2007, 11:39:25 AM
Seems pointless to me. you have to actually click to open the spoilers, even then.
BUT THE IMAGES STILL LOAD YOU IDIOT

also spoiler tag is used too much

Infel

Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 13, 2007, 11:52:41 AM
BUT THE IMAGES STILL LOAD YOU IDIOT

also spoiler tag is used too much
Which is why it's marked NSFW above the damn tag.

guff


Go Up