November 16, 2024, 04:47:13 AM

1,531,348 Posts in 46,734 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


post in this thead or i vote for trump in 2020

Started by C.Mongler, August 07, 2018, 08:35:38 AM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Daddy

electoralism is shit and you should abolish the state

YPrrrr

Quote from: Khadafi on August 07, 2018, 01:02:12 PMelectoralism is shit and you should abolish the state
Okay have fun sitting at your cushy job doing nothing Karl

The Hand That Fisted Everyone

Quote from: Khadafi on August 07, 2018, 12:52:47 PM
Quote from: YPargh on August 07, 2018, 11:10:30 AM
Quote from: Khadafi on August 07, 2018, 09:07:25 AMHurry, fellow liberals! You can also stop Dr*mpfh from winning. Ride the BlUE Wave 2018 and stop BENITO CHEETOLINI ORANGEMAN now.

Voting has been hacked and rigged but if you stop this man from supporting Tinyhands Putinwife we can win this!
Can already tell JMV learned nothing and will vote 3rd party

(although his state doesn't matter tbh)

Fun fact: voting third party had no bearing on clinton losing and this is just a cop out by neoliberals

Closest 5 States that Trump Won

Wisconsin: 45.65% HRC, 47.22% DJT, 1.04% Stein, (3.58% Johnson)  -  HRC + Stein = 46.69% < 47.22% Trump : NC
Michigan:  47.27% HRC, 47.50% DJT, 1.07% Stein, (3.59% Johnson)   -  HRC + Stein = 48.34% > 47.50% Trump: ÂÃ,±16EV
Pennsylvania: 47.46% HRC, 48.18% DJT, 0.81% Stein, (2.38% Johnson) - HRC + Stein = 48.53% > 48.18% Trump: ÂÃ,±20EV
Arizona: 45.13% HRC, 48.67% DJT, 1.33% Stein, (4.13% Johnson) - HRC + Stein = 46.46% < 48.67% Trump: NC
Florida: 47.82% HRC, 49.02% DJT, 0.68% Stein, (2.20% Johnson) -  HRC + Stein = 48.50% < 49.02% Trump: NC

So if liberals are correct and Jill stein is why hillary lost these states (because 100% of stein voters would vote otherwise, and vote for hillary), then hillary'd have an additional 36 electoral votes, and trump'd have 36 fewer.

Trump's new total: 304-36 = 268 EV
HRC's new total: 227+36 =  263 EV.  Let's even give her that 1 random EV that someone gave to sanders (while not giving trump the 3 that went to colin powell). 264 EV. 

Neither would have 270 so idk how that'd play out but Hillary would still have fewer electoral votes even if Jill Stein never ran.  This also has liberals ignoring the fact that she won several states by a smaller margin than Gary Johnson garnered.  In fact, with this logic, GJ+DJT had more votes than HRC+JS.

Even if Jill Stein didn't exist but all of the other conservatives in the race still ran, Hillary would still have lost the election based on how the electoral college works.

Don't let liberals try to convince you out of voting third party because they run shitty campaigns.
qft

Daddy

Quote from: YPargh on August 07, 2018, 01:03:29 PM
Quote from: Khadafi on August 07, 2018, 01:02:12 PMelectoralism is shit and you should abolish the state
Okay have fun sitting at your cushy job doing nothing Karl
I'm actually running a tabletop excerise rn

Daddy

I should have used the email used in phishing podesta

C.Mongler


don't let's

That moment you realized that jmv defected to China and was turned into a spy  xiapproves;

Kalahari Inkantation



Daddy

Quote from: don't let's on August 07, 2018, 06:26:12 PMThat moment you realized that jmv defected to China and was turned into a spy  xiapproves;
na probably isn't too accepting on Ancoms since they have fake Maoism.

Imagine pretending to be communists by claiming you're the worst and most revisionist tendency

That's China

akudood;

Daddy

August 07, 2018, 07:12:04 PM #25 Last Edit: August 07, 2018, 07:17:31 PM by Khadafi
If you ever see a commie writing an essay with multiple points, and using complex language from theory, they're a Maoist

Kalahari Inkantation

china is arguably the very face of neoliberalism goowan

C.Mongler


Thyme

one vote for every boyah member who doesn't post in this thread

that's a lot of votin'

Daddy

Quote from: Magyarorszag on August 07, 2018, 07:12:32 PMchina is arguably the very face of neoliberalism goowan

I actually agree with you.

Aggressive pursuit of GDP growth through state management of the economy (the US largely does this through the Federal Reserve) at the expense of the country's domestic workers, even in cases where foreign countries are the exploiters.

China's economy is the dream of what neoliberals want. Their authoritarian government is something else tho

Go Up