November 14, 2024, 07:49:10 PM

1,531,348 Posts in 46,734 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


Freak'in Windows

Started by Zack777, August 07, 2007, 03:26:41 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Title27GT

Quote from: Lawlz on August 07, 2007, 03:44:00 PM
When you factor in the discounts Apple offers and the lifespan of Macs, yeah, they are fairly cheap. $1000 for a computer that can run the latest OS eight years from now is a damn good deal. powerofone;
They also have ridiculous resale value. An iBook G3 could still go for 300 bucks.

guff

Quote from: Lawlz on August 07, 2007, 03:44:00 PM
When you factor in the discounts Apple offers and the lifespan of Macs, yeah, they are fairly cheap. $1000 for a computer that can run the latest OS eight years from now is a damn good deal. powerofone;
oh yeah i can't wait to get leopard on my g3 imac

Macs being Macs doesn't somehow make them immune to Moore's law.  psyduck;
Not to mention that upgrading can be more difficult, meaning one would have to buy an entirely new model.

Title27GT

Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 07, 2007, 03:54:05 PM
oh yeah i can't wait to get leopard on my g3 imac

Macs being Macs doesn't somehow make them immune to Moore's law.  psyduck;
Not to mention that upgrading can be more difficult, meaning one would have to buy an entirely new model.
One would not have to buy an entirely new model, because unlike PCs people upgrade, they don't come with shitty specs that you have to upgrade yourself.

guff

Quote from: Title on August 07, 2007, 03:56:12 PM
One would not have to buy an entirely new model, because unlike PCs people upgrade, they don't come with shitty specs that you have to upgrade yourself.
What the fuck are you trying to say?  psyduck;

Zack777

Quote from: Title on August 07, 2007, 03:56:12 PM
One would not have to buy an entirely new model, because unlike PCs people upgrade, they don't come with shitty specs that you have to upgrade yourself.

True, but it is kinda fun building your own PC, I had fun building mine

Title27GT

Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 07, 2007, 03:57:25 PM
What the fuck are you trying to say?  psyduck;
I'd rather have my computer COME with 1 gig of RAM and a 200 gig Hard Drive than have my computer come with 512 RAM and an 80 gigabyte hard drive that I'd have to upgrade myself.

Feynman

Quote from: Title on August 07, 2007, 04:01:59 PM
I'd rather have my computer COME with 1 gig of RAM and a 200 gig Hard Drive than have my computer come with 512 RAM and an 80 gigabyte hard drive that I'd have to upgrade myself.


You can customize a PC when buying it, too. psyduck;

guff

Quote from: Title on August 07, 2007, 04:01:59 PM
I'd rather have my computer COME with 1 gig of RAM and a 200 gig Hard Drive than have my computer come with 512 RAM and an 80 gigabyte hard drive that I'd have to upgrade myself.
as bassir said

Also, up until the new lines were just announced, the lower-end iMacs (which Zach would have to get because he's poor) came with just 512MB of memory.  One could have easily found a far cheaper PC with a GB of memory.  psyduck;

Title27GT

Quote from: Bassir C. on August 07, 2007, 04:03:44 PM
You can customize a PC when buying it, too. psyduck;
You can customize a Mac when buying it, too  psyduck;

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 07, 2007, 04:06:46 PM
as bassir said

Also, up until the new lines were just announced, the lower-end iMacs (which Zach would have to get because he's poor) came with just 512MB of memory.  One could have easily found a far cheaper PC with a GB of memory.  psyduck;
And Windows Vista hogs up every little byte.

Mac OS X runs perfectly fine on just 128 megs of RAM, and can even be run on as little as 64. psyduck;

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Zack777

Quote from: Lawlz on August 07, 2007, 04:08:37 PM
And Windows Vista hogs up every little byte.

Mac OS X runs perfectly fine on just 128 megs of RAM, and can even be run on as little as 64. psyduck;

I disagree, OS X needs a lot of Ram. IMO it runs smoothly on at least 512 or 768

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: Zack777 on August 07, 2007, 04:09:47 PM
I disagree, OS X needs a lot of Ram. IMO it runs smoothly on at least 512 or 768
Any OS when slapped on more powerful hardware will perform better. I've used OS X Tiger on some of the first iMacs, and it's pretty damn smooth.

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Pele


Zack777

Quote from: Lawlz on August 07, 2007, 04:12:09 PM
Any OS when slapped on more powerful hardware. I've used OS X Tiger on some of the first iMacs, and it's pretty damn smooth.

Well, I do a lot of media work, so the work I do I need a lot of power

But windows XP needs a lot of CPU power, it's hard on even a 1.6GHz AMD

guff

Quote from: Lawlz on August 07, 2007, 04:08:37 PM
And Windows Vista hogs up every little byte.

Mac OS X runs perfectly fine on just 128 megs of RAM, and can even be run on as little as 64. psyduck;
cool

So, you'd be fine with your mac running on 128 MB? psyduck;

Quote from: Lawlz on August 07, 2007, 04:12:09 PM
Any OS when slapped on more powerful hardware will perform better.
But you said it ran perfectly fine.  psyduck;

Go Up