Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: silvertone on July 22, 2017, 09:53:13 AM

Title: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: silvertone on July 22, 2017, 09:53:13 AM
YOU CANNOT BE AN ATHEIST AND BELIEVE TRAPS ARE GAY NOW. YOU CANNOT T BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION AND THINK TRAPS ARE GAY.
THE SCIENTISTS HAVE WORKED VERY HARD AND STUDIED MANY HORNY BRAINS AND FOUND IT ALL OUT

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498424




TLDR:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DFWojeiXYAAhAJ0.jpg)

[gamp = men attracted to trans]
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: silvertone on July 22, 2017, 03:37:53 PM
Quote from: Snowy on July 22, 2017, 01:07:01 PM
traps are super gay dude
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498424 this is funded by the US federal GOVERNMENT
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Samus Aran on July 22, 2017, 06:56:53 PM
i know this is a shitpost thread but like none of this makes sense? actual human gynandromorphs (GAMs) don't exist?? the closest thing is hermaphrodism, but that's a mutation, not something that occurs naturally like actual gynandromorphism does in insects and such

and "traps" (word i hate btw) aren't even remotely related to this

so not only is that study flawed from the beginning by not even using correct terminology, but also, bad thread op
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: ?????? on July 22, 2017, 07:06:56 PM
aren't mutations natural
I always assumed guys into traps weren't gay
I should've transitioned when I had the chance before I started to bulk
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: bluaki on July 22, 2017, 07:13:43 PM
Aren't traps separate from transpeople?

I thought "trap" means a cis (or maybe genderqueer/genderfluid) boy who could pass as an attractive girl

I think they're usually crossdressers

anyway, I think the idea of sexual orientation with respect to transpeople is a case-by-case basis. some het/homo people could be attracted to any transperson who identifies as the gender they like, some of them are attracted to the ones who pass well enough, some of them are only fine with post-op, some of them aren't okay with dating a transperson at all. some of them identify as het/homo at first but later find out they're bi/pan

I don't like the idea of fetishizing transwomen, but I'm pretty sure most of the guys who do aren't (exclusively) homosexual
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: ME## on July 22, 2017, 07:14:02 PM
This is why I only like men with vaginas
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: silvertone on July 22, 2017, 07:19:36 PM
Quote from: اÙ,,Ù,رÙ,Ø© on July 22, 2017, 07:06:56 PM
aren't mutations natural
I always assumed guys into traps weren't gay
I should've transitioned when I had the chance before I started to bulk
  you fucked up
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Samus Aran on July 22, 2017, 07:20:16 PM
Quote from: bluaki on July 22, 2017, 07:13:43 PM
Aren't traps separate from transpeople?

I thought "trap" means a cis (or maybe genderqueer/genderfluid) boy who could pass as an attractive girl

I think they're usually crossdressers


i'm pretty sure this is correct, yeah. the only problem is that a lot of people kind of ignore this and use "trap" as a larger umbrella term for "passing as a girl but with a penis" and ignoring said person's gender identity. which is why i don't like the term, it's just too often a mislabel and its origins as a term are pretty gross. so i try to avoid it.
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: ?????? on July 22, 2017, 07:32:37 PM
Quote from: SVT on July 22, 2017, 07:19:36 PM
Quote from: اÙ,,Ù,رÙ,Ø© on July 22, 2017, 07:06:56 PM
aren't mutations natural
I always assumed guys into traps weren't gay
I should've transitioned when I had the chance before I started to bulk
  you fucked up
woll u still accept me
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: silvertone on July 22, 2017, 09:33:30 PM
Quote from: اÙ,,Ù,رÙ,Ø© on July 22, 2017, 07:32:37 PM
Quote from: SVT on July 22, 2017, 07:19:36 PM
Quote from: اÙ,,Ù,رÙ,Ø© on July 22, 2017, 07:06:56 PM
aren't mutations natural
I always assumed guys into traps weren't gay
I should've transitioned when I had the chance before I started to bulk
  you fucked up
woll u still accept me
yes baby. <3
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: YPrrrr on July 23, 2017, 09:19:55 PM
Quote from: Nico Yazawa on July 22, 2017, 07:20:16 PM
Quote from: bluaki on July 22, 2017, 07:13:43 PM
Aren't traps separate from transpeople?

I thought "trap" means a cis (or maybe genderqueer/genderfluid) boy who could pass as an attractive girl

I think they're usually crossdressers

i'm pretty sure this is correct, yeah. the only problem is that a lot of people kind of ignore this and use "trap" as a larger umbrella term for "passing as a girl but with a penis" and ignoring said person's gender identity. which is why i don't like the term, it's just too often a mislabel and its origins as a term are pretty gross. so i try to avoid it.
Yeah I don't think the people who would consider it a trap would really care about the gender identity aspect n_u

If a person looks like a pretty girl but has a penis, they would be considered a trap generally.
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Mando Pandango on July 23, 2017, 09:22:07 PM
Quote from: bluaki on July 22, 2017, 07:13:43 PM
Aren't traps separate from transpeople?

I thought "trap" means a cis (or maybe genderqueer/genderfluid) boy who could pass as an attractive girl

I think they're usually crossdressers
I've always made this distinction as well.
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 15, 2017, 01:00:41 AM
Quote from: Nico Yazawa on July 22, 2017, 06:56:53 PM
i know this is a shitpost thread but like none of this makes sense? actual human gynandromorphs (GAMs) don't exist?? the closest thing is hermaphrodism, but that's a mutation, not something that occurs naturally like actual gynandromorphism does in insects and such

and "traps" (word i hate btw) aren't even remotely related to this

so not only is that study flawed from the beginning by not even using correct terminology, but also, bad thread op


i mean, i'm sure the researchers behind this are aware that actual human hermaphrodites are exceedingly rare lol

a "trap" is generally understood to be a male crossdresser who passes as female

so for a straight male to find a passable "trap" attractive would be no more "gay" than a straight male finding a passable transgirl attractive, unless you would argue that that is also "gay"

the study seems logically consistent to me
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: C.Mongler on August 15, 2017, 05:04:06 AM
Quote from: David on July 22, 2017, 07:14:02 PM
This is why I only like men with vaginas
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: YPrrrr on August 15, 2017, 09:01:10 AM
Wait so do pheromones not even matter if we're so simplistic as to be attracted to anyone that merely looks like our desired sex confuseddood;
Quote from: Majorana's Mask on August 15, 2017, 01:00:41 AM
Quote from: Nico Yazawa on July 22, 2017, 06:56:53 PM
i know this is a shitpost thread but like none of this makes sense? actual human gynandromorphs (GAMs) don't exist?? the closest thing is hermaphrodism, but that's a mutation, not something that occurs naturally like actual gynandromorphism does in insects and such

and "traps" (word i hate btw) aren't even remotely related to this

so not only is that study flawed from the beginning by not even using correct terminology, but also, bad thread op


i mean, i'm sure the researchers behind this are aware that actual human hermaphrodites are exceedingly rare lol

a "trap" is generally understood to be a male crossdresser who passes as female

so for a straight male to find a passable "trap" attractive would be no more "gay" than a straight male finding a passable transgirl attractive, unless you would argue that that is also "gay"

the study seems logically consistent to me
P. sure it includes pre-op transwomen too because in a one night stand there's potentially the "surprise!" factor.
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 15, 2017, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: YPargh on August 15, 2017, 09:01:10 AM
Wait so do pheromones not even matter if we're so simplistic as to be attracted to anyone that merely looks like our desired sex confuseddood;


pheromones do matter, but we use just a handful of basic sensory tests to quickly distinguish males from females in day to day life, and pheromones aren't generally part of that quick assessment

if a biological male successfully passes 9/10 of those basic tests for "female" due to the way they look/dress/behave/sound/etc., then we can overlook the fact that they might not pass the pheromone test

plus pheromones are the sort of thing that are extremely easy to mask or obfuscate using perfume or smth

and there's probably such a wide range of pheromonal profiles that even a biological female might give off a more 'masculine' essence

Quote from: YPargh on August 15, 2017, 09:01:10 AM
P. sure it includes pre-op transwomen too because in a one night stand there's potentially the "surprise!" factor.


in terms of physical characteristics there would naturally be significant overlap between passing pre-op transwomen and passing "traps", but i doubt there are too many actual transwomen who willingly embrace the term "trap" lol
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: YPrrrr on August 15, 2017, 02:01:37 PM
Quote from: Majorana's Mask on August 15, 2017, 01:57:50 PM
Quote from: YPargh on August 15, 2017, 09:01:10 AM
Wait so do pheromones not even matter if we're so simplistic as to be attracted to anyone that merely looks like our desired sex confuseddood;


pheromones do matter, but we use just a handful of basic sensory tests to quickly distinguish men from women in day to day life, and pheromones aren't generally part of that quick assessment

if a biological male successfully passes 9/10 of those basic tests for "female" due to the way they look/dress/behave/sound/etc., then we can overlook the fact that they might not pass the pheromone test

plus pheromones are the sort of thing that are extremely easy to mask or obfuscate using perfume or smth

and there's probably such a wide range of pheromonal profiles that even a biological female might give off a more 'masculine' essence

Quote from: YPargh on August 15, 2017, 09:01:10 AM
P. sure it includes pre-op transwomen too because in a one night stand there's potentially the "surprise!" factor.


in terms of physical characteristics there would naturally be significant overlap between passing pre-op transwomen and passing "traps", but i doubt there are too many actual transwomen who willingly embrace the term "trap" lol
Oh I'm just describing how the term would be used derogitorially. Definitely wouldn't expect many trans people to enjoy being described as such. Yeah I guess if someone were to self-identify as a trap they'd prob be a cross dresser or somehow involved in like sex cam stuff
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 08, 2018, 08:52:47 PM
BUMP BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE SOME PEOPLE NEED A REMINDER OF THIS INDISPUTABLE SCIENCE
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: C.Mongler on August 08, 2018, 09:06:41 PM
tec do you identify as a trap now
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 08, 2018, 09:10:10 PM
the condition of 'trap' is pretty binary: can you 'trap' otherwise """straight""" males or not

if not, you literally can't be a trap lol

I look like a typical nu-male. I'm not fooling anyone. akudood;
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: The artist formally known on August 08, 2018, 09:22:21 PM
So Tec DOES identify as a trap now.
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 08, 2018, 09:24:21 PM
I literally am not a trap. I couldn't pull it off even if I wanted to, I'm among the most manly and rugged people I know. :|

i'm only here to clear up some common scientific misconceptions girl;
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: The artist formally known on August 08, 2018, 09:25:36 PM
Quote from: Magyarorszag on August 08, 2018, 09:24:21 PMI literally am not a trap. I couldn't pull it off even if I wanted to, I'm among the most manly and rugged people I know. :|

i'm only here to clear up some common scientific misconceptions girl;
there you go playing that trap card
Title: Re: The Science is IN - TRAPS AREN'T GAY.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 08, 2018, 09:26:57 PM
i lol'd :'(

i don't have the trap æsthetic cry;