Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 02:50:57 PM

Title: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 02:50:57 PM
You guys know what to do. I'll kick this thread off with a post I made yesterday:

Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 12:22:45 AM
You know, I almost feel sorry for Lawlz. He must be pretty desperate since he spends so much of his time at a place where he knows practically everyone hates his guts. Hell, he's so pathetic that he doesn't even succeed at being an asshole, try as he might. Ultimately, though, I can never truly pity him  because it's his fault he's so disliked.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 23, 2008, 02:53:37 PM
I MEAN.... His above normal e-ego.


Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:53:48 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 12:25:20 AM
No, because I don't hate women as a whole nor do I hate white people as a whole.

If there's a term for the hate of the specific gender of a specific race, then apply it to female caucasians and it'd work.
Apparently, Lawlz hates all the girls here (including me :() other than Zayna just for being white doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: FullmetalGanon on March 23, 2008, 02:54:32 PM
i like lawlz :(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Trini on March 23, 2008, 02:54:35 PM
Oh shit, you actually made it.  baddood;

I don't really have a problem with lawlz. I usually just end up chuckling at his posts or something.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Garahe on March 23, 2008, 02:55:31 PM
Lawlz nearly created a child board because he was inspired by my "Gardevoir" thread I made when I had the mental capacity of a 7 year old baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: C.Mongler on March 23, 2008, 02:58:40 PM
Telling me the 360 sucks and then making then counter argument that the Gamecube and Saturn were great systems.

Lawlz is alright, I just can't stand to talk to him about the vidya.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:58:43 PM
Quote from: Qualanx on March 23, 2008, 02:55:31 PM
I had the mental capacity of a 7 year old
As far as I know, that part wasn't Lawlz' fault

Also, the entire reason we've even started having new chat threads often was because of Lawlz.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 23, 2008, 02:58:48 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:53:48 PM
Apparently, Lawlz hates all the girls here (including me :() other than Zayna just for being white doodthing;
I hate you too. giggle;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Garahe on March 23, 2008, 03:00:56 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:58:43 PM
As far as I know, that part wasn't Lawlz' fault


...ouch baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 23, 2008, 03:04:56 PM
Oh, I also forgot he's poor.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: C.Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:05:27 PM
Quote from: Qualanx on March 23, 2008, 02:55:31 PM
Lawlz nearly created a child board because he was inspired by my "Gardevoir" thread I made when I had the mental capacity of a 7 year old baddood;


So now that its two days later your mental capacity is normal? wut

Quote from: Dr.Gerbil on March 23, 2008, 03:05:04 PM
360 does suck, the Gamecube was great.  doodthing;


oh god lol. you can argue 360 sucks sure, but gamecube great? lol
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: C.Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:07:37 PM
Quote from: Dr.Gerbil on March 23, 2008, 03:06:30 PM
Gamecue had awesome games, Nintendo just didn't know what to make and how to market them.


It had like 10 awesome games, but that means it wasnt that great lol

also wut
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 23, 2008, 03:08:05 PM
The Lawlz Trials start now.



DEBATE TO DEADMIN/IP BAN
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 03:08:42 PM
Quote from: Kefka  link=topic=25440.msg385280#msg385280 date=1206310085
The Lawlz Trials start now.



DEBATE TO DEADMIN/IP BAN
We need poll first.
I vote in favor of both.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Garahe on March 23, 2008, 03:13:09 PM
Quote from: C Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:05:27 PM
So now that its two days later your mental capacity is normal? wut


more or less. Havent you ever had a day you've just felt stupid?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: C.Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:15:12 PM
Quote from: Qualanx on March 23, 2008, 03:13:09 PM
more or less. Havent you ever had a day you've just felt stupid?


nope cant say i have  baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: [REDACTED] on March 23, 2008, 03:15:51 PM
How could we trust you for using Firefox on Mac?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 03:20:51 PM
He's highly narcissistic.  He over-idealizes things. 
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Sam on March 23, 2008, 03:24:41 PM
He calls me ugly but still has my nudes saved on his computer as far as I know.

And even if he doesn't have them saved now, he did at one point and I believe he shared them. Overall he's just an asshole.

Although, I can pretty much forsee that he'll be having a very lonely and pitiful future, so I don't have any desire to get back at him in any way.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 03:29:03 PM
He let down the heart of a hopeless nation when he exposed himself on the Superbowl's halftime show.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Garahe on March 23, 2008, 03:30:14 PM
Quote from: C Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:15:12 PM
nope cant say i have  baddood;


forget it

this is boyah
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: famy on March 23, 2008, 03:33:17 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:53:48 PM
Apparently, Lawlz hates all the girls here (including me :() other than Zayna just for being white doodthing;
that is perfectly fine i dont see anything wrong with that
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: C.Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:40:06 PM
Quote from: samsam on March 23, 2008, 03:24:41 PM
He calls me ugly but still has my nudes saved on his computer as far as I know.

And even if he doesn't have them saved now, he did at one point and I believe he shared them. Overall he's just an asshole.

Although, I can pretty much forsee that he'll be having a very lonely and pitiful future, so I don't have any desire to get back at him in any way.


may i have them  befuddlement
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 03:51:45 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 03:29:03 PM
He let down the heart of a hopeless nation when he exposed himself on the Superbowl's halftime show.
No, that was Dick Cheney.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 03:55:12 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:53:48 PM
Apparently, Lawlz hates all the girls here (including me :() other than Zayna just for being white doodthing;
That reminds me: He can't argue for shit. If he doesn't know how to respond to an argument, he suddenly stops using capitalization and punctuation and tries to dodge the point. For example, he wouldn't give me a straight answer when I accused him of being prejudiced towards Caucasian females.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 03:56:23 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 03:51:45 PM
No, that was Dick Cheney.

Nope I'm positive it was either Lawlz or Hillary Clinton.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: guff on March 23, 2008, 04:07:50 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 03:55:12 PM
That reminds me: He can't argue for shit. If he doesn't know how to respond to an argument, he suddenly stops using capitalization and punctuation and tries to dodge the point. For example, he wouldn't give me a straight answer when I accused him of being prejudiced towards Caucasian females.
why the fuck are you using firefox on a mac you fucking idiot
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: strongbad on March 23, 2008, 04:08:21 PM
Quote from: C Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:40:06 PM
may i have them  befuddlement
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Andrios on March 23, 2008, 04:11:30 PM
I like Lawlz, I just wish he wouldn't pick on others so much.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ME## on March 23, 2008, 04:21:40 PM
I hate how he thinks his opinion on games is fact. :|
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daphnia on March 23, 2008, 05:33:37 PM
He's so dreamy.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Socks on March 23, 2008, 05:41:37 PM
Lawlz's level of reasonable acceptance is like that of a two year old and his level of emotional maturity is probably the same.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 05:56:07 PM
Quote from: C Mongler on March 23, 2008, 03:05:27 PM
oh god lol. you can argue 360 sucks sure, but gamecube great? lol
Gamecube had plenty of great exclusives, and the 360 has like two exclusives... and no great ones.

Super Mario Sunshine is the best 3D Mario game, the Metroid Prime series is fantastic, Wind Waker is pretty awesome, the Pikmin games are fresh like a Sega game and gorgeous, and F-Zero GX is the best racer ever.

Also, I suppose if you absolutely despise shmups then the Saturn isn't too good of a console, but it's still loaded with great games and nothing can surpass its 2D capabilities. Also also, if you can honestly say you don't like the Saturn but can even dare say the Dreamcast is half decent, you're a retard that doesn't even know what a Dreamcast looks like.
Quote from: Socks on March 23, 2008, 05:41:37 PM
Lawlz's level of reasonable acceptance is like that of a two year old and his level of emotional maturity is probably the same.
you certainly shouldn't be talking about maturity or intelligence, sir
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 05:56:14 PM
Okie enough
Quote
Do not use personal attacks
These forums are just for fun, please don't ruin someones life over it. This rule is for harsh personal attacks, not anything along the lines of "ur oogly" or "jew!". Also, don't be that much of a pussy by small insults. Welcome to the internet.

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 05:57:56 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 05:56:14 PM
Okie enough
i liked this thread

Also, I never said I hated Bluaki and I actually like her aside from the fact she for some raisin hates me.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 05:59:04 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 05:57:56 PM
i liked this thread

Also, I never said I hated Bluaki and I actually like her aside from the fact she for some raisin hates me.

okie then

let the insulting commence
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 06:00:35 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 05:57:56 PM
i liked this thread

Also, I never said I hated Bluaki and I actually like her aside from the fact she for some raisin hates me.
You hate all caucasian females but for some reason don't hate me? doodhuh;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:01:34 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 05:56:14 PM
Okie enough
Criticisms are not the same as personal attacks.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:02:21 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 06:00:35 PM
You hate all caucasian females but for some reason don't hate me? doodhuh;
Because you don't bitch and whine like the women I know and you don't seem to be as stupid, so I'm fine with you.

And I don't hate Pinkeh, but she's posting pictures and I reserve the right to say she's ugly and I do.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Socks on March 23, 2008, 06:06:54 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 05:56:07 PM
you certainly shouldn't be talking about maturity or intelligence, sir


No that's your domain, I forgot.

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:15:18 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:02:21 PM
Because you don't bitch and whine like the women I know and you don't seem to be as stupid, so I'm fine with you.
The girls you know don't necessarily reflect on the general female Caucasian population.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:16:40 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:15:18 PM
The girls you know don't necessarily reflect on the general female Caucasian population.
I've observed thousands of women and all of them have essentially been the same beast.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:23:59 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:16:40 PM
I've observed thousands of women and all of them have essentially been the same beast.
But men are somehow better?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:25:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:23:59 PM
But men are somehow better?
Most men I've known have been stupid, but a good chunk that I've known aren't.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:26:46 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:25:21 PM
Most men I've known have been stupid, but a good chunk that I've known aren't.
Congratulations, you've been conditioned to live the male gender stereotype.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:28:50 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:26:46 PM
Congratulations, you've been conditioned to live the male gender stereotype.
sure okay

Except I'm pretty much the exact opposite of the stereotypical male.

also define the stereotypical male
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:32:25 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:28:50 PM
Except I'm pretty much the exact opposite of the stereotypical male.
Like hell.


Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:28:50 PM
also define the stereotypical male
sure okay
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:33:01 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 06:32:25 PM
Like hell.

sure okay
because you can't
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: C.Mongler on March 23, 2008, 06:33:53 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 05:56:07 PM
you're a retard that doesn't even know what a Dreamcast looks like.


(http://web-japan.org/kidsweb/archives/cool/98-10-12/dreamcast.jpg)

i believe it is the large squareular object in the upper portion of the photo  baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 06:35:34 PM
Lawlz is egotistical, can't argue for shit because he skips and hops between subjects (avoiding ones he can't give retorts to) and loses interest too quickly, and is just generally annoying.

And he actually thinks people care about his "rules." What a joke.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: The artist formally known on March 23, 2008, 06:40:44 PM
that one time he said it totally wouldn't get me prengate
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 06:41:29 PM
Quote from: reefer on March 23, 2008, 06:40:44 PM
that one time he said it totally wouldn't get me prengate

he lied. how's the baby?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Wrench on March 23, 2008, 06:41:59 PM
I love Lawlz
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Sam on March 23, 2008, 06:45:19 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:28:50 PM
also define the stereotypical male

Sexist jackass who thinks with his penis.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 06:45:47 PM
Quote from: samsam on March 23, 2008, 06:45:19 PM
Sexist jackass


egotistical
loves electronics
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: hotlikesauce. on March 23, 2008, 06:46:22 PM
Being sexy.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:48:21 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 06:45:47 PM
egotistical
loves electronics
loves sports
loves beer
loves sex
loves action movies
shows off his muscles
possesses little to no knowledge of anything

So I love technology and games and have a penis; YPR plays games, has a penis, and loves sports--he's closer to the stereotypical male than I am.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: The artist formally known on March 23, 2008, 06:49:13 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 06:41:29 PM
he lied. how's the baby?
aborted faget
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 06:50:20 PM
lawlz is a faggot
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 06:50:40 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:48:21 PM
loves sports
loves beer
loves sex
loves action movies
shows off his muscles
possesses little to no knowledge of anything

So I love technology and games and have a penis; YPR plays games, has a penis, and loves sports--he's closer to the stereotypical male than I am.


uh...the last one doesn't really apply, considering the spread of knowledge is too diverse and there's no possible way for you or anyone else here to actually know how much the males we have come into contact actually know about the world

but that's nice and all i guess

you still fit the bill for the worst parts of the stereotypical male
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:52:38 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 06:50:40 PM
uh...the last one doesn't really apply, considering the spread of knowledge is too diverse and there's no possible way for you or anyone else here to actually know how much the males we have come into contact actually know about the world

but that's nice and all i guess

you still fit the bill for the worst parts of the stereotypical male
uh you're a dick too

i think everyone here is a complete asshole aside from maybe reaper and wrench and ypr which often seem too nice
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 06:53:03 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 05:56:07 PM
Super Mario Sunshine is the best 3D Mario game

goowan Sure.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:53:46 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 06:53:03 PM
goowan Sure.
64 sucks ass and wasn't even complete.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 06:54:34 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:52:38 PM
uh you're a dick too


I'm nice to most people here...the only person I'm usually negative toward is you. I'm friendly with most of the users, except for little arguments I've had with the likes of Nyerp and unwelcomed. I think I might have said a few mean things to Bassir too when he kept spamming "rock."
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 06:55:36 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:52:38 PM
uh you're a dick too

i think everyone here is a complete asshole aside from maybe reaper and wrench and ypr which often seem too nice
I'm only a dick to people who act like idiots.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 06:56:46 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:53:46 PM
64 sucks ass and wasn't even complete.

Oh it's great that you assume that I was defending that.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 06:57:19 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 06:54:34 PM
I'm nice to most people here...the only person I'm usually negative toward is you. I'm friendly with most of the users, except for little arguments I've had with the likes of Nyerp and unwelcomed. I think I might have said a few mean things to Bassir too when he kept spamming "rock."

we've had our share of arguments.  baddood;

but i love everyone, forreals.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 06:57:41 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 06:56:46 PM
Oh it's great that you assume that I was defending that.
if you're insinuating galaxy is better than sunshine, i scoff at that too
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Placebo Headwound on March 23, 2008, 06:57:47 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:52:38 PM
uh you're a dick too

i think everyone here is a complete asshole aside from maybe reaper and wrench and ypr which often seem too nice
I'm not an asshole. ;_;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 06:58:27 PM
Quote from: Jesus Christ on March 23, 2008, 06:57:47 PM
I'm not an asshole. ;_;

for you are our savior
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Wrench on March 23, 2008, 06:59:01 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 06:58:27 PM
for you are our savior

i love V too
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 06:59:17 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 06:57:19 PM
we've had our share of arguments.  baddood;

but i love everyone, forreals.


Yes, I think we did a long time ago. I also seem to remember arguing with Lozal back on Powerspike. She was supposedly a guy back then.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 06:59:28 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:57:41 PM
if you're insinuating galaxy is better than sunshine, i scoff at that too

Like hell I'm insinuating, it is the better game, hands down.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:00:10 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 06:59:17 PM
Yes, I think we did a long time ago. I also seem to remember arguing with Lozal back on Powerspike. She was supposedly a guy back then.
Michael Christopher Reiner. OMG I WAS DESTINED TO LIKE MCR im 16

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 07:01:42 PM
Quote from: WrenchNinja on March 23, 2008, 06:59:01 PM
i love V too

You're probably our best user here.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 07:01:48 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:33:01 PM
because you can't
and you've always been so good about responding to my arguments


Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:48:21 PM
loves sports
loves beer
loves sex
loves action movies
shows off his muscles
possesses little to no knowledge of anything

So I love technology and games and have a penis; YPR plays games, has a penis, and loves sports--he's closer to the stereotypical male than I am.
it's not the specific interests and knowledge, it's the egocentric, aggressive way of thinking

for example:
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:53:46 PM
64 sucks ass and wasn't even complete.
my opinion is RIGHT and it's somehow important that you agree


Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:52:38 PM
uh you're a dick too

i think everyone here is a complete asshole aside from maybe reaper and wrench and ypr which often seem too nice
if everyone is such a dick then why do you even come here
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Wrench on March 23, 2008, 07:07:03 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 07:01:42 PM
You're probably our best user here.

Behind you of course. :3
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Socks on March 23, 2008, 07:09:32 PM
Quote from: WrenchNinja on March 23, 2008, 07:07:03 PM
Behind you of course.


Get a room you two.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 07:09:37 PM
Quote from: WrenchNinja on March 23, 2008, 07:07:03 PM
Behind you of course. :3
No Wrench is the best.

You're just awesome.  wub;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Wrench on March 23, 2008, 07:12:31 PM
Quote from: Genocyde on March 23, 2008, 07:09:37 PM
No Wrench is the best.

You're just awesome.  wub;

wub;

You too, man. We gotta play Brawl.
Quote from: Socks on March 23, 2008, 07:09:32 PM
Get a room you two.

Hotel rooms are too expensive.  :(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:13:46 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 06:59:28 PM
Like hell I'm insinuating, it is the better game, hands down.
There are like two good levels, and even they're pretty forgettable.

Superior graphics? Sure. Superior music? Maybe. Superior gameplay and levels? No way.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 07:14:47 PM
Quote from: WrenchNinja on March 23, 2008, 07:07:03 PM
Behind you of course. :3

Don't be modest.  doodella;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Socks on March 23, 2008, 07:15:29 PM
Quote from: WrenchNinja on March 23, 2008, 07:12:31 PM
Hotel rooms are too expensive.


Cheap whore.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on March 23, 2008, 07:16:03 PM
he's egotistical, annoying,takes the message icons way too seriously, and dickish.

But for some reason I respect him, he's a good guy at heart.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:16:25 PM
Quote from: The Rainbow Connection on March 23, 2008, 07:16:03 PM
he's egotistical, annoying,takes the message icons way too seriously, and dickish.

But for some reason I respect him, he's a good guy at heart.
OR SO YOU THINK
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:16:36 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:13:46 PM
There are like two good levels, and even they're pretty forgettable.

Superior graphics? Sure. Superior music? Maybe. Superior gameplay and levels? No way.


All Sunshine levels were water-based. No variety. Also the F.L.U.D.D. was a gimmick piece of shit.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Wrench on March 23, 2008, 07:17:22 PM
Quote from: Socks on March 23, 2008, 07:15:29 PM
Cheap whore.

Parents bedroom is better anyway.
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 07:14:47 PM
Don't be modest.  doodella;

Believe me, I'm not. giggle;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 07:17:51 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:16:36 PM
All Sunshine levels were water-based. No variety. Also the F.L.U.D.D. was a gimmick piece of shit.
I don't believe that last level was water based.

Nor was the Hotel level.
Or the first level  baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:20:35 PM
Quote from: Genocyde on March 23, 2008, 07:17:51 PM
I don't believe that last level was water based.

Nor was the Hotel level.
Or the first level  baddood;

Think of the lava as evil water that kills you and there you go.

FUCKING MANTA RAY SHIT
Also that was the worst stage in any game ever.

Uh yes it was.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 07:21:48 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:20:35 PM
Think of the lava as evil water that kills you and there you go.

FUCKING MANTA RAY SHIT
Also that was the worst stage in any game ever.

Uh yes it was.
Oh well I agree with you anyway.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:22:15 PM
Quote from: Genocyde on March 23, 2008, 07:17:51 PM
I don't believe that last level was water based.

Nor was the Hotel level.
Or the first level  baddood;
what about the level with the giant trees

All of the levels in Super Mario Galaxy revolve around hopping to flying chunks of land with their own disgustingly strong gravitational pulls. Galaxy isn't bad, but nowhere near as good as Sunshine.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 07:25:31 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:16:36 PM
All Sunshine levels were water-based.
The amusement park, the volcano, I think there's one hotel-themed level, and those missions where you play without FLUDD.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on March 23, 2008, 07:25:39 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:16:25 PM
OR SO YOU THINK
Jesus christ, just take that god damn compliment.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:26:28 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:22:15 PM
what about the level with the giant trees

All of the levels in Super Mario Galaxy revolve around hopping to flying chunks of land with their own disgustingly strong gravitational pulls. Galaxy isn't bad, but nowhere near as good as Sunshine.

LOL USE FLUDD TO DOUSE THIS FUCKING RAMPAGING CHAIN CHOMP
I fucking hate this game so much. Those fucking platformer levels, too. Goddamn.

how is that a bad thing
at least you don't have to rely on some shitty forced gimmick to get everything done

Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 07:25:31 PM
The amusement park

In every level you have to use water to do anything. That's what I mean.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on March 23, 2008, 07:29:13 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:22:15 PM
what about the level with the giant trees

All of the levels in Super Mario Galaxy revolve around hopping to flying chunks of land with their own disgustingly strong gravitational pulls. Galaxy isn't bad, but nowhere near as good as Sunshine.
And those planets had much more variety than the stages in Sunshine. Not to mention the FLUDD mechanics sucked ass.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: superclucky on March 23, 2008, 07:29:53 PM
Lawlz doesn't have empathy/sympathy for others.
Other than that I luv lawlz.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 07:31:24 PM
Quote from: Clucky et al. on March 23, 2008, 07:29:53 PM
Other than that I luv lawlz.
Impossible.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:31:52 PM
Quote from: The Rainbow Connection on March 23, 2008, 07:29:13 PM
And those planets had much more variety than the stages in Sunshine. Not to mention the FLUDD mechanics sucked ass.
And only about two levels were fun and the planets were the size of grapes.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:32:43 PM
Quote from: Genocyde on March 23, 2008, 07:31:24 PM
Impossible.
i luv lawlz too.

he just annoys me a lot since his personality is so flawed.


i don't hate him though.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 07:32:58 PM
I agree that Sunshine was better.  baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:34:50 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:31:52 PM
And only about two levels were fun and the planets were the size of grapes.

Which two levels? doodthing;

Also the fact that there are tons more levels than there are in Sunshine highly makes up for it.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on March 23, 2008, 07:35:57 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:31:52 PM
And only about two levels were fun
Lol no.

I , and the majority of people will disagree with you on this, but because you're you, I want bother arguing.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:37:24 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 07:32:58 PM
I agree that Sunshine was better.  baddood;
I can agree with V on something.
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:34:50 PM
Which two levels? doodthing;

Also the fact that there are tons more levels than there are in Sunshine highly makes up for it.
The windy garden level or whatever was cool... and I actually can't think of any others. The toy one was kind of okay, but could've been so much better.

I'd take around a half dozen huge and awesome levels over a mess of crappy ones.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:40:47 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:37:24 PM
I can agree with V on something.The windy garden level or whatever was cool... and I actually can't think of any others. The toy one was kind of okay, but could've been so much better.

I'd take around a half dozen huge and awesome levels over a mess of crappy ones.

Galaxy did have its share of big levels. Sunshine, though? A hotel and a shore. HUEG A hill and a beach. HUEG
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: superclucky on March 23, 2008, 07:41:12 PM
Quote from: Genocyde on March 23, 2008, 07:31:24 PM
Impossible.
No. |:
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 07:41:53 PM
I liked Sunshine the most out of the three as well, but not by much. All three are pretty close.

It's too bad that Hotel Delfino sucked so bad.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:42:57 PM
I haven't played a 3D mario adventure since 64, so I can't comment on sunshine or galaxy.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 07:43:46 PM
Quote from: Clucky et al. on March 23, 2008, 07:41:12 PM
No. |:
Yes.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: superclucky on March 23, 2008, 07:44:35 PM
Quote from: Genocyde on March 23, 2008, 07:43:46 PM
Yes.
No.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 07:44:44 PM
Not all levels in Galaxy are composed of plenty of small planets befuddlement

The gimmicky levels (pull-stars, rolling on a marble, manta surfing), the swimming levels, toy galaxy, the haunted house place, some of the bowser ones, the two bee galaxies, and a few others.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:46:24 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 07:41:53 PM
I liked Sunshine the most out of the three as well, but not by much. All three are pretty close.

It's too bad that Hotel Delfino sucked so bad.

Hotel Delfino and Pianta Village and the volcano ruined an already crappy game.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:48:04 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 07:44:44 PM


The gimmicky levels (pull-stars, rolling on a marble, manta surfing), the swimming levels, toy galaxy, the haunted house place, some of the bowser ones, the two bee galaxies, and a few others.
That's a fragment.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 07:49:09 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:46:24 PM
Hotel Delfino and Pianta Village and the volcano ruined an already crappy game.


I sorta liked Pianta Village, but it was one of the weaker levels. Corona Mountain was just a tiny thing leading to Bowser. Why would you even complain about that? It lasts about 10 minutes and is easy as hell.

Bowser was a dull fight though.  :(

I still liked the Bowser fights in 64 way more than in the other two games.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 07:49:31 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 07:48:04 PM
That's a fragment.
That's because the other half of the statement is in the first sentence.
I don't care if I post fragments as long as the point is shown and not omitted.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on March 23, 2008, 07:50:03 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 07:49:09 PM


I still liked the Bowser fights in 64 way more than in the other two games.
How could you not? spinning that koopa around was too fun.

"SO LONG GAY BOWSER"
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Wrench on March 23, 2008, 07:52:30 PM
Quote from: The Rainbow Connection on March 23, 2008, 07:50:03 PM
How could you not? spinning that koopa around was too fun.

"SO LONG GAY BOWSER"

I lol'd.

I love that game.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:53:12 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 07:48:04 PM
That's a fragment.

OH GOD SHE FORGOT THE COLON

Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 07:49:09 PM
I sorta liked Pianta Village, but it was one of the weaker levels. Corona Mountain was just a tiny thing leading to Bowser. Why would you even complain about that? It lasts about 10 minutes and is easy as hell.

Bowser was a dull fight though.  :(

I still liked the Bowser fights in 64 way more than in the other two games.

Because it was annoying as hell for me. The first part is simply routine but the fucking boat shit. Goddamn.

Not to mention glitchy. :/

I didn't like anything about this game. FLUDD was terible; stages were bland and annoying; Yoshi was terrible; controls were terrible. Galaxy is just so much more refined and fun.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:53:42 PM
also 100+ posts and no one's said anything about how i find the mentally retarded to be completely and utterly useless
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:54:41 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:53:42 PM
also 100+ posts and no one's said anything about how i find the mentally retarded to be completely and utterly useless

lol use them for fuel goowan
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: superclucky on March 23, 2008, 07:55:03 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:53:42 PM
also 100+ posts and no one's said anything about how i find the mentally retarded to be completely and utterly useless
i thought about it thats why i said no sympathy/empathy for others y/n

\
what do i win lawls
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:55:20 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:53:42 PM
also 100+ posts and no one's said anything about how i find the mentally retarded to be completely and utterly useless
It would be contradicting how you find yourself to be amazing. spam;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:55:31 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:54:41 PM
lol use them for fuel goowan
that was just me being silly but that would admittedly be pretty cool weewee;
Quote from: Clucky et al. on March 23, 2008, 07:55:03 PM
i thought about it thats why i said no sympathy/empathy for others y/n

\
what do i win lawls
my tears
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Samus Aran on March 23, 2008, 07:55:47 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:53:12 PM
OH GOD SHE FORGOT THE COLON
Because it was annoying as hell for me. The first part is simply routine but the fucking boat shit. Goddamn.

Not to mention glitchy. :/

I didn't like anything about this game. FLUDD was terible; stages were bland and annoying; Yoshi was terrible; controls were terrible. Galaxy is just so much more refined and fun.


Yoshi was a disappointment, yes. The controls worked fine though, so I dunno how you managed to have trouble with them.

I never encountered any glitches other than Yoshi's mouth staying open and his saddle hovering above him if you jump off him while he's spraying juice.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: superclucky on March 23, 2008, 07:56:11 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:55:31 PM
my tears
but you dont cry :'(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 07:56:36 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 07:55:20 PM
It would be contradicting how you find yourself to be amazing. spam;

ooh lawlz is gonna need some antibiotics or some type of healing ointment and band-aids for that burn. :\
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:57:44 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 07:56:36 PM
ooh lawlz is gonna need some antibiotics or some type of healing ointment and band-aids for that burn. :\
It was better when guff did it.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:58:39 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:57:44 PM
It was better when guff did it.
wat
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 07:59:04 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 07:58:39 PM
wat
i'd like some ointment for my burn
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 07:59:34 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:59:04 PM
i'd like some ointment for my burn
white ppl use oitnment
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 07:59:46 PM
Quote from: Kazanova on March 23, 2008, 07:55:47 PM
Yoshi was a disappointment, yes. The controls worked fine though, so I dunno how you managed to have trouble with them.

I never encountered any glitches other than Yoshi's mouth staying open and his saddle hovering above him if you jump off him while he's spraying juice.

FLUDD and everything about him controlled terribly. Also it was, like in Mario 64, annoying to get Mario to jump the way you wanted him to. Also the camera. smithicide;

I was talking about the Bowser fight. I kept stepping on the cracks and fell through. What the hell was that.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 08:00:18 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:57:44 PM
It was better when guff did it.

everything's better when Guff does it.  doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:05:06 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 07:53:42 PM
also 100+ posts and no one's said anything about how i find the mentally retarded to be completely and utterly useless
Honestly, I guess I do too.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:06:03 PM
FACT: Nintendeath sucks at games and that's why he sticks to RPGs because they require no skill or agility at all.
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:05:06 PM
Honestly, I guess I do too.
yay we can kind of agree on something
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 08:06:34 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:06:03 PM
FACT: Nintendeath sucks at games and that's why he sticks to RPGs because they require no skill or agility at all.yay
He sucks at posting.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on March 23, 2008, 08:09:16 PM
The only things I dislike about Lawlz are the way that he tells his opinions as facts and how he swears he's superior to everyone.
Other that that, I like him.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 23, 2008, 08:10:22 PM
Quote from: HUNTER TECTRON on March 23, 2008, 08:09:16 PM
The only things I dislike about Lawlz are the way that he tells his opinions as facts and how he swears he's superior to everyone.
Win.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:10:57 PM
About the retarded, you're an idiot.

Who the fuck cares? They aren't hurting you. What, every 1 in 50,000 people are retarded to the point where they can't work, if even that.

As long as they don't reproduce, natural selection isn't negatively affected and no harm is being done.

They don't give a shit about you so why do you give a shit about them?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:12:33 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:10:57 PM
As long as they don't reproduce, natural selection isn't negatively affected and no harm is being done.
But some of them do.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:13:31 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:06:03 PM
FACT: Nintendeath sucks at games and that's why he sticks to RPGs because they require no skill or agility at all.yay we can kind of agree on something

What brought you to saying this. Also I don't stick to RPGs. Also you have no idea if I suck at games or not. Also fuck you.

Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 08:06:34 PM
He sucks at posting.

But, well um...
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 08:14:00 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:12:33 PM
But some of them do.
Protip: Retarded people don't produce retarded children just because they are retarded.

They can have normal kids.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:16:19 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:12:33 PM
But some of them do.


well then oh well, what can you do?

Hay Let's put them all in concentration camps and cut their balls off and throw some slop and dog biscuits in for them once every 2 weeks.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 08:18:02 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:16:19 PM
well then oh well, what can you do?

Hay Let's put them all in concentration camps and cut their balls off and throw some slop and dog biscuits in for them once every 2 weeks.

Or save the dog biscuits for dogs, and just kill off the retards.  doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:19:20 PM
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 08:18:02 PM
Or save the dog biscuits for dogs, and just kill off the retards.  doodthing;


Excellent. Because we all know no retarded people can live normal and happy lives.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:19:39 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:16:19 PM
well then oh well, what can you do?

Hay Let's put them all in concentration camps and cut their balls off and throw some slop and dog biscuits in for them once every 2 weeks.

lawlz approves of this message thumbup;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 08:20:57 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:19:20 PM
Excellent. Because we all know no retarded people can live normal and happy lives.

I didn't say they can't, I was just suggesting a way to make it easier on them; what you suggested was near torture.  doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:22:47 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:10:57 PM
About the retarded, you're an idiot.

Who the fuck cares? They aren't hurting you. What, every 1 in 50,000 people are retarded to the point where they can't work, if even that.

As long as they don't reproduce, natural selection isn't negatively affected and no harm is being done.

They don't give a shit about you so why do you give a shit about them?
They cost heaps of money to support and they give little to nothing back to the world. Even if I don't find a cure to cancer, I'll still support myself and help other people. A man with the mentality of a five year old bound to a wheelchair is costing me money and not providing anything back to anyone.

And what's worse is quite a few people with genetic disorders do reproduce, because not letting them would be "unethical."

what happened to the good ol' days when they were left on a mountainside for the wolves

Also, look at Mongler's thread for a sample of shit that shouldn't live and will never serve a purpose aside from a being black hole that sucks up happiness and resources wherever it goes.
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 08:14:00 PM
Protip: Retarded people don't produce retarded children just because they are retarded.

They can have normal kids.
It also depends on the condition. If the person just has limited intellectual capabilities, like my mother, they can produce and entirely functional person like me.

if they've got genetic disorders that lead to mental retardation or whatever, they may or may not yield disabled offspring
Quote from: V on March 23, 2008, 08:18:02 PM
Or save the dog biscuits for dogs, and just kill off the retards.  doodthing;
what about vida :'(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 08:24:36 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:22:47 PM
They cost heaps of money to support and they give little to nothing back to the world. Even if I don't find a cure to cancer, I'll still support myself and help other people. A man with the mentality of a five year old bound to a wheelchair is costing me money and not providing anything back to anyone.
They can sort glass cheaply.  doodhuh;

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:24:56 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:16:19 PM
well then oh well, what can you do?

Hay Let's put them all in concentration camps and cut their balls off and throw some slop and dog biscuits in for them once every 2 weeks.
...

maybe you could just not put a ton of effort and money on saving a life of some newborn that is repeatedly on the brink of death and in some incurable condition, I'm pretty sure those often end up being the worst kind.
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:19:20 PM
Excellent. Because we all know no retarded people can live normal and happy lives.
I don't care about the ones that actually can, it's the ones that really can't even think much or live remotely normal lives that bother me.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:25:25 PM
lawlz hates me because i disagree with his opinion powerofone;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:25:46 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 08:24:36 PM
They can sort glass cheaply.  doodhuh;


Robots do it for only the cost of electricity, which is cents per hour.

They don't need our medical care or food.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 08:26:36 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:25:46 PM
Robots do it for only the cost of electricity, which is cents per hour.

They don't need our medical care or food.
but "I sort glass, that's my job." ROBOTS CAN'T MAKE THOSE VIDEOS.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:28:02 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 08:26:36 PM
but "I sort glass, that's my job." ROBOTS CAN'T MAKE THOSE VIDEOS.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l882xbFywho[/youtube]

But they can dance/
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:28:05 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:22:47 PM
They cost heaps of money to support and they give little to nothing back to the world. Even if I don't find a cure to cancer, I'll still support myself and help other people. A man with the mentality of a five year old bound to a wheelchair is costing me money and not providing anything back to anyone.

And what's worse is quite a few people with genetic disorders do reproduce, because not letting them would be "unethical."

what happened to the good ol' days when they were left on a mountainside for the wolves

Also, look at Mongler's thread for a sample of shit that shouldn't live and will never serve a purpose aside from a being black hole that sucks up happiness and resources wherever it goes.It also depends on the condition. If the person just has limited intellectual capabilities, like my mother, they can produce and entirely functional person like me.

if they've got genetic disorders that lead to mental retardation or whatever, they may or may not yield disabled offspringwhat about vida :'(


yea too bad the video featured a girl with physical deformities, and I'm talking about MENTAL illnesses.

So I guess you think we should also kill off all average-class working men and women, because they aren't doing anything phenomenal to improve society either.

What the hell is wrong with simply living? What are we all working for if all of us just continue to work?


Also, Lawlz, you rest on the idea that you are one day going to transform society. I'm interested in exactly what you plan on doing.

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:28:42 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 08:26:36 PM
but "I sort glass, that's my job." ROBOTS CAN'T MAKE THOSE VIDEOS.

DON'T throw us away!
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:28:43 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 23, 2008, 08:26:36 PM
but "I sort glass, that's my job." ROBOTS CAN'T MAKE THOSE VIDEOS.
I don't think humorous videos are actually worth that much.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:31:05 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:24:56 PM
I don't care about the ones that actually can, it's the ones that really can't even think much or live remotely normal lives that bother me.


Well that's a shame, because if you re-read my first post, I said those retarded to the point where they can't work.

I meant those who can't like maintain a full-time job and shelter an average middle-class family. Not those who can't think and just sit in a wheelchair and drool.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:31:31 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:28:05 PM
So I guess you think we should also kill off all average-class working men and women, because they aren't doing anything phenomenal to improve society either.
did i say they had to be gods

Those middle class workers work together to better everyone's lives. They provide goods and services for the general populace, and don't just leech off everyone. Those people make fair livings and are capable of supporting themselves.

Now shut up.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:33:07 PM
i'm lawlz and my opinion is right and if you don't agree you suck at everything and you are a dangerous retard
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:33:55 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:31:31 PM
did i say they had to be gods

Those middle class workers work together to better everyone's lives. They provide goods and services for the general populace, and don't just leech off everyone. Those people make fair livings and are capable of supporting themselves.

Now shut up.


Retarded people, like the ones I'm talking about (refer to numerous previous posts) can get simple jobs and also, even if minimally, help society's progression.

And you also fail to realize that there are thousands of homes for the retarded, who in themselves provide jobs for normal working-class citizens.

Now YOU can shut up.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:34:34 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:33:07 PM
i'm lawlz and my opinion is right and if you don't agree you suck at everything and you are a dangerous retard
Selkie and you are doing pretty much the same thing. If anyone disagrees, it's bitchbitchwhinewhine.
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:33:55 PM
Retarded people, like the ones I'm talking about (refer to numerous previous posts) can get simple jobs and also, even if minimally, help society's progression.

And you also fail to realize that there are thousands of homes for the retarded, who in themselves provide jobs for normal working-class citizens.

Now YOU can shut up.
Those homes could instead be forests that provide oxygen for the planet.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:34:43 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:28:02 PM
But they can dance/
that's AWESOME.
Seriously, that has to be midgets in suits, I've never seen robots move so fluidly.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 08:35:35 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:34:34 PM
Those homes could instead be forests that provide oxygen for the planet.
They'd be pretty small forests.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:36:29 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:34:34 PM
Selkie and you are doing pretty much the same thing. If anyone disagrees, it's bitchbitchwhinewhine.

Thanks for admitting it.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:37:08 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:34:34 PM
Those homes could instead be forests that provide oxygen for the planet.


Ok it's pretty obvious now that you are running out of fuel in your argument...

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:37:35 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:37:08 PM
Ok it's pretty obvious now that you are running out of fuel in your argument...


Burning some downers might give me a boost. powerofone;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: JGE on March 23, 2008, 08:39:01 PM
i forgot what this thread was about
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 08:39:16 PM
fuck you lawlz there will be no bad-talk about my future wife and mother of my children.  baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:39:27 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:31:05 PM
Well that's a shame, because if you re-read my first post, I said those retarded to the point where they can't work.

I meant those who can't like maintain a full-time job and shelter an average middle-class family. Not those who can't think and just sit in a wheelchair and drool.
That's the thing, I was saying that just the ones who "can't think and just sit in a wheelchair and drool" are the ones that bother me.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:39:41 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:37:35 PM
Burning some downers might give me a boost. powerofone;


maybe  poochie

also Lawlz, you never answered my question. What will be your glorious revelation that will forever transform and improve society?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:40:15 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:39:41 PM
maybe  poochie

also Lawlz, you never answered my question. What will be your glorious revelation that will forever transform and improve society?
I didn't say I was going to; I said I'm capable of supporting myself and others.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:40:21 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:39:27 PM
That's the thing, I was saying that just the ones who "can't think and just sit in a wheelchair and drool" are the ones that bother me.


well then why are we even arguing  n_u
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:40:56 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:40:15 PM
I didn't say I was going to; I said I'm capable of supporting myself and others.


oh, well the way you talk about yourself says more than that  O_0
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:41:28 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:39:41 PM
also Lawlz, you never answered my question. What will be your glorious revelation that will forever transform and improve society?
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:22:47 PM
They cost heaps of money to support and they give little to nothing back to the world. Even if I don't find a cure to cancer, I'll still support myself and help other people. A man with the mentality of a five year old bound to a wheelchair is costing me money and not providing anything back to anyone.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:41:45 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:40:56 PM
oh, well the way you talk about yourself says more than that  O_0
maybe you're just stupid
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:43:33 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:41:45 PM
maybe you're just stupid


I'll stop the argument here out of pity.

lawlz, you know we kind of think the same. Aside from our opinions on subject matters, there is a similar concept brewing in both our minds. I know you will refuse to believe it but I know it's true.

Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:44:23 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:40:21 PM
well then why are we even arguing  n_u
idk[:

I wasn't really trying to argue befuddlement
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:45:14 PM
Quote from: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:43:33 PM
I'll stop the argument here out of pity.

lawlz, you know we kind of think the same. Aside from our opinions on subject matters, there is a similar concept brewing in both our minds. I know you will refuse to believe it but I know it's true.


That we pity each other?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:45:59 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:44:23 PM
idk[:

I wasn't really trying to argue befuddlement


I don't really like arguing with people over the internets, or with people who haven't really got me annoyed. So I don't really know why I did it.

I guess cause I know you or lawlz wouldn't take it personal
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Selkie on March 23, 2008, 08:46:27 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:45:14 PM
That we pity each other?


no, regarding the meaning of life.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:47:01 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 08:44:23 PM
idk[:
I found that disgustingly cute.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 08:47:52 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:47:01 PM
I found that disgustingly cute.
She's a lesbian, Lawlz.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 23, 2008, 08:49:22 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 08:47:52 PM
She's a lesbian, Lawlz.
Hence the "disgustingly".  caterpie;


I'm kidding.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 23, 2008, 08:49:43 PM
Bluaki he called you disgusting. meaty cocks
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 08:47:52 PM
She's a lesbian, Lawlz.
lesbians can't be cute

you sexist dick
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Placebo Headwound on March 23, 2008, 08:51:19 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:50:28 PM
lesbians can't be cute

you sexist dick
I don't think sexist is the word you're looking for. doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 23, 2008, 08:51:27 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:50:28 PM
lesbians can't be cute

you sexist dick
No, I meant she's not interested in you. Lesbians can most certainly be cute.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 09:22:59 PM
Quote from: Jesus Christ on March 23, 2008, 08:51:19 PM
I don't think sexist is the word you're looking for. doodthing;
I used it because Houdini called me sexist earlier when it didn't fit.

goddamn spend more time here
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Tomboh on March 23, 2008, 09:41:58 PM
retards should be killed because i dont like them. :(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: The Speaker Of Words on March 23, 2008, 09:45:18 PM
Lawlz is a cool guy. He acts like an idiot a lot but whatever.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 23, 2008, 09:50:06 PM
Quote from: The Speaker Of Words on March 23, 2008, 09:45:18 PM
Lawlz is a cool guy. He acts like an idiot a lot but whatever.
Get the fuck ouuuuuuut.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 23, 2008, 09:59:41 PM
Quote from: Kefka  link=topic=25440.msg386023#msg386023 date=1206334206
Get the fuck ouuuuuuut.
is it because you don't have to act like an idiot because you are one :'(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Garahe on March 23, 2008, 10:18:30 PM
Quote from: Kefka  link=topic=25440.msg386073#msg386073 date=1206335862
5-3=34


1+1=3?
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 23, 2008, 10:18:55 PM
Quote from: Qualanx on March 23, 2008, 10:18:30 PM
1+1=3?
75
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 23, 2008, 10:19:17 PM
80025449949....and 70.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Garahe on March 23, 2008, 10:19:47 PM
Quote from: Kefka  link=topic=25440.msg386076#msg386076 date=1206335935
75

But I thought 7x0=75
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: sans culottes on March 23, 2008, 10:43:29 PM
I stopped reading this thread when Lawlz replied.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: [REDACTED] on March 24, 2008, 03:25:15 AM
guys wrong board
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 24, 2008, 04:05:09 AM
What the fuck. It was getting into such a good arguement until you all talked about Super Mario 3D games for about 3 pages.



So anyways, I hate Lawlz. He acts like the most hated person in my school. Also, I'm still a dipshit after a month. :\
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: strongbad on March 24, 2008, 06:33:33 AM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 24, 2008, 04:05:09 AM
So anyways, I hate Lawlz. He acts like the most hated person in my school. Also, I'm still a dipshit after a month. :\

There is a reason for that
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 24, 2008, 07:07:33 AM
So I mean anyway, even the "story" presented in Galaxy was better than the "story" in Sunshine and
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on March 24, 2008, 07:28:21 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 08:28:02 PM
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l882xbFywho[/youtube]

But they can dance/
Their movements are so realistic that it's almost creepy. \(O_o)/
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: FAMY2 on March 24, 2008, 11:00:04 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 23, 2008, 06:52:38 PM
uh you're a dick too

i think everyone here is a complete asshole aside from maybe reaper and wrench and ypr which often seem too nice


Too bad you think that. I like you. I like Felt too. Oh wait, I like everyone.    O_0
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 24, 2008, 11:20:06 AM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 24, 2008, 07:07:33 AM
So I mean anyway, even the "story" presented in Galaxy was better than the "story" in Sunshine and
Sure, maybe. It was just a rehash of the Super Mario Bros/World/64 story.

Sunshine didn't have the best story in the world, but hell, at least it was different. Your entire purpose in Sunshine was to figure out who was screwing up the island; Galaxy is wondering where the hell Bowser took the princess.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: [REDACTED] on March 24, 2008, 11:22:32 AM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b8/999_Perspective.png/800px-999_Perspective.png)
=1
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 24, 2008, 11:23:05 AM
Quote from: KEEEEN LEEEE on March 24, 2008, 11:22:32 AM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b8/999_Perspective.png/800px-999_Perspective.png)
=1
wrong
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: [REDACTED] on March 24, 2008, 11:23:38 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 11:23:05 AM
wrong
banned for blasphemy
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 24, 2008, 11:47:23 AM
Quote from: steal on March 24, 2008, 11:31:33 AM
Lawlz's endless jackassery and Crusade mentality about his opinions can get annoying, but I still like him. befuddlement
one of my great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfathers or uncles was a general for a legion of crusaders powerofone;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 24, 2008, 12:29:37 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 11:20:06 AM
Sure, maybe. It was just a rehash of the Super Mario Bros/World/64 story.

Sunshine didn't have the best story in the world, but hell, at least it was different. Your entire purpose in Sunshine was to figure out who was screwing up the island; Galaxy is wondering where the hell Bowser took the princess.

And from that story comes the worst Mario character in history to be shat out...Bowser Jr. baddood;

Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 11:47:23 AM
one of my great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfathers or uncles was a general for a legion of crusaders powerofone;

and this affects you how
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 24, 2008, 12:31:12 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 24, 2008, 12:29:37 PM
And from that story comes the worst Mario character in history to be shat out...Bowser Jr. baddood;
I can agree with you there.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: JGE on March 24, 2008, 12:34:50 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 11:20:06 AM
Sure, maybe. It was just a rehash of the Super Mario Bros/World/64 story.

Sunshine didn't have the best story in the world, but hell, at least it was different. Your entire purpose in Sunshine was to figure out who was screwing up the island; Galaxy is wondering where the hell Bowser took the princess.

Technically around 75% in the game it turns out to be another "find the princess" segment.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: prettygirl on March 24, 2008, 12:53:39 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 23, 2008, 02:53:48 PM
Apparently, Lawlz hates all the girls here (including me :() other than Zayna just for being white doodthing;
i'm not exactly white
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: JGE on March 24, 2008, 12:54:29 PM
Quote from: prettygirl on March 24, 2008, 12:53:39 PM
i'm not exactly white

Exactly.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Title27GT on March 24, 2008, 12:55:38 PM
It doesn't really matter anymore. It's almost as if the administration and most long-time Boyagers have spent so much time hating Lawlz and wishing he was gone that they're starting not to care. Really, I would have dove into this thread a couple months ago, but Lawlz isn't going to leave until JMV buys the new server (never) and there's no use in telling Lawlz what he already knows.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 24, 2008, 12:59:32 PM
Quote from: prettygirl on March 24, 2008, 12:53:39 PM
i'm not exactly white
Which is why I specified other that you.
You're not exactly white and Lawlz doesn't hate you whatsoever.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: prettygirl on March 24, 2008, 01:01:43 PM
Quote from: bluaki on March 24, 2008, 12:59:32 PM
Lawlz doesn't hate you whatsoever.
i wouldn't say that..
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 24, 2008, 01:33:32 PM
Quote from: David. on March 24, 2008, 06:33:33 AM
There is a reason for that
I know.

I've been one for 2 months, and still counting.

I know it was Lawlz, because I posted some dumb topic in a deleted board.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Title27GT on March 24, 2008, 01:37:49 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 24, 2008, 01:33:32 PM
I know.

I've been one for 2 months, and still counting.

I know it was Lawlz, because I posted some dumb topic in a deleted board.
You're also an idiot, and based on what Tomboh has told me, an even bigger one in real life.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 24, 2008, 02:05:39 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 24, 2008, 01:33:32 PM
I know.

I've been one for 2 months, and still counting.

I know it was Lawlz, because I posted some dumb topic in a deleted board.
I actually don't think I gave it to you, nor do I remember you posting a topic in the recycle board.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 24, 2008, 02:24:15 PM
Quote from: Title on March 24, 2008, 01:37:49 PM
You're also an idiot, and based on what Tomboh has told me, an even bigger one in real life.
I know I am. How many times have I been told that? 30+ times from Boyah. So seriously, it's annoying the shit out of me.

Also, he doesn't even see me all the time. We've only talked about 5 times and saw each other WALKING in the hallway about 10 times or even less. So, I think he's lying.









Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 24, 2008, 02:24:50 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 02:05:39 PM
I actually don't think I gave it to you, nor do I remember you posting a topic in the recycle board.
No, it was in the Flash Board, the one that Kaz wanted.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 24, 2008, 04:02:28 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 24, 2008, 02:24:15 PM
saw each other WALKING in the hallway.


I read that as WANKING in the hallway.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: strongbad on March 24, 2008, 04:44:29 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 24, 2008, 04:02:28 PM
I read that as WANKING in the hallway.

It is kinda hard to tell a difference when in caps
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: UnagiPower on March 24, 2008, 06:33:41 PM
Damn it I missed it.

Sunshine is better than Galaxy.  :'(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 24, 2008, 06:37:05 PM
Shut the fuck up about Sunshine and Galaxy and get back to discussing Lawlz's idiocy.  baddood;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: superclucky on March 24, 2008, 07:14:15 PM
so what about that crazy weather guys
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 24, 2008, 07:14:34 PM
Quote from: Clucky et al. on March 24, 2008, 07:14:15 PM
so what about that crazy weather guys

i love you clucky


Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 24, 2008, 07:15:40 PM
I had more stuff to list but people threw the thread off topic and now it wouldn't fit in. :'(
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Nyerp on March 24, 2008, 07:16:14 PM
OK Lawlz is an idiot for liking Sunshine more than Galaxy. My opinion on why Lawlz is an idiot. There. goowan
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 24, 2008, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Nyerp on March 24, 2008, 07:16:14 PM
OK Lawlz is an idiot for liking Sunshine more than Galaxy. My opinion on why Lawlz is an idiot. There. goowan
No.

Galaxy is too fucking easy. God, it's so boring after beating the game with a measly 50 stars. I even wanted to see if there were more harder stages, but no, they're all to fucking easy. I quitted after 67 stars or maybe 69...

Sunshine on the other hand, is in the middle of 64 and Galaxy which is a good thing for me.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 24, 2008, 07:32:39 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 24, 2008, 07:24:59 PM
No.

Galaxy is too fucking easy. God, it's so boring after beating the game with a measly 50 stars. I even wanted to see if there were more harder stages, but no, they're all to fucking easy. I quitted after 67 stars or maybe 69...

Sunshine on the other hand, is in the middle of 64 and Galaxy which is a good thing for me.
it takes like 60 to beat galaxy

But I stopped after I got 65, tried to pick it up again, got 67, and now I'm done forever.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: bluaki on March 24, 2008, 07:35:25 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 07:32:39 PM
it takes like 60 to beat galaxy

But I stopped after I got 65, tried to pick it up again, got 67, and now I'm done forever.
I actually got all 120 with Mario and about 52 with Luigi before I stopped playing.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 24, 2008, 07:36:21 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 24, 2008, 07:32:39 PM
it takes like 60 to beat galaxy

But I stopped after I got 65, tried to pick it up again, got 67, and now I'm done forever.
Considering that I haven't played SMG since 4 months ago, it's a pretty close number to 60.


Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Houdini on March 24, 2008, 08:37:14 PM
Quote from: JMV on March 24, 2008, 07:15:40 PM
I had more stuff to list but people threw the thread off topic and now it wouldn't fit in. :'(
By all means, post it.

If you guys want to whine about Mario games, take it to the video game board.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Daddy on March 24, 2008, 08:41:19 PM
Quote from: Houdini on March 24, 2008, 08:37:14 PM
By all means, post it.

If you guys want to whine about Mario games, take it to the video game board.
Well when he talks about convicted child molesters he talks about how they should be left alone once they serve their time in prison and are released.  I don't necessarily disagree with him.

It's the fact that he starts bitching about teens who have consensual sex.


He's defending people who rape children, but acts like two consenting teens are a travesty.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Tomboh on March 24, 2008, 09:18:35 PM
Quote from: Title on March 24, 2008, 01:37:49 PM
and based on what Tomboh has told me, an even bigger one in real life.
doodthing; i never said that. ive seen nothing to measure his intelligence. just enough to know he looks funni with his enormous hair befuddlement
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: unwelc0med on March 24, 2008, 11:06:14 PM
Quote from: FullmetalGanon on March 23, 2008, 02:54:32 PM
i like lawlz :(

haters.

i love lawlz.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: me003 on March 25, 2008, 12:12:41 AM
It doesn't accept people using different browsers. I'm sure this has been said many times.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 25, 2008, 12:19:28 AM
Quote from: MethreE on March 25, 2008, 12:12:41 AM
It doesn't accept people using different browsers. I'm sure this has been said many times.
I don't care what browser you use on OS X so long as it's not Mozilla based.

The jackasses advertise it as a "safer and faster browsing experience" when it's the slowest goddamn browser on the Mac platform and the only browser that's less secure than it is Internet Explorer.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: me003 on March 25, 2008, 12:27:50 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 25, 2008, 12:19:28 AM
It don't care what browser you use on OS X so long as it's not Mozilla based.

The jackasses advertise it as a "safer and faster browsing experience" when it's the slowest goddamn browser on the Mac platform and the only browser that's less secure than it is Internet Explorer.
How about you can have your opinion, just don't press it so damn hard onto other people, jerk.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 25, 2008, 12:30:54 AM
Quote from: MethreE on March 25, 2008, 12:27:50 AM
How about you can have your opinion, just don't press it so damn hard onto other people, jerk.
except those aren't opinions
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: me003 on March 25, 2008, 12:38:32 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 25, 2008, 12:30:54 AM
except those aren't opinions
Yes,  they are. Now shut the fuck up.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 25, 2008, 12:47:15 AM
Quote from: MethreE on March 25, 2008, 12:38:32 AM
Yes,  they are. Now shut the fuck up.
Firefox is the slowest Mac browser and it's less secure than Opera, Safari, etc.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: me003 on March 25, 2008, 12:56:51 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 25, 2008, 12:47:15 AM
Firefox is the slowest Mac browser and it's less secure than Opera, Safari, etc.
Blah.blah.blah shiira's slower (on my computer), it doesn't make any fucking difference, you're just agitating, now I'm done.

And so you dipshit me, because you're a whiney bitch.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on March 25, 2008, 01:11:40 AM
Quote from: MethreE on March 25, 2008, 12:56:51 AM
Blah.blah.blah shiira's slower (on my computer), it doesn't make any fucking difference, you're just agitating, now I'm done.

And so you dipshit me, because you're a whiney bitch.
Shiira is slower only because the Safari 3 update killed it. Firefox is still about a third the speed of Safari.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 25, 2008, 07:42:25 AM
Quote from: Tomboh on March 24, 2008, 09:18:35 PM
doodthing; i never said that. ive seen nothing to measure his intelligence. just enough to know he looks funni with his enormous hair befuddlement

And now Title looks like a fucking dumbass. Can't say it's surprising, though.  befuddlement
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 25, 2008, 07:49:06 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on March 25, 2008, 01:11:40 AM
Shiira is slower only because the Safari 3 update killed it. Firefox is still about a third the speed of Safari.

Stop dipshitting people because they oppose you.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 25, 2008, 09:42:24 AM
Quote from: Tomboh on March 24, 2008, 09:18:35 PM
doodthing; i never said that. ive seen nothing to measure his intelligence. just enough to know he looks funni with his enormous hair befuddlement
Why thank you for clearing that up, sir.


Also, I wasn't in the Locker room just to see you get undressed, like you said.  doodthing;
Oh, and Sean Blanco is retarded sometimes, so you could ignore him sometimes.


He tried to bullshit Tito, lol.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Commander Fuckass on March 25, 2008, 09:48:33 AM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 25, 2008, 09:42:24 AM
Why thank you for clearing that up, sir.


Also, I wasn't in the Locker room just to see you get undressed, like you said.  doodthing;
Oh, and Sean Blanco is retarded sometimes, so you could ignore him sometimes.


He tried to bullshit Tito, lol.
r these people illegal foreigners
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 25, 2008, 09:53:45 AM
Quote from: Kefka on March 25, 2008, 09:48:33 AM
r these people illegal foreigners


shhh don't tell the government


Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: guff on March 25, 2008, 12:45:13 PM
Quote from: V on March 25, 2008, 07:49:06 AM
Stop dipshitting people because they oppose you.
how about eradication of dipshitting altogether doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: V on March 25, 2008, 12:47:23 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on March 25, 2008, 12:45:13 PM
how about eradication of dipshitting altogether doodthing;

and just ban the dipshits.  doodthing;
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Tomboh on March 25, 2008, 01:52:14 PM
Quote from: Kefka on March 25, 2008, 09:48:33 AM
r these people illegal foreigners
sean blanco is asian and tito is black or something

blanco is cool. i have like 4 classes with him
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on March 25, 2008, 02:30:20 PM
Quote from: Tomboh on March 25, 2008, 01:52:14 PM
sean blanco is asian and tito is black or something

blanco is cool. i have like 4 classes with him
Tito, black? He's fucking guatamalen, he's not even that dark. (sp.)

Also, Sean is kind of stupid at times.
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Geno on March 25, 2008, 03:45:59 PM
Quote from: V on March 25, 2008, 12:47:23 PM
and just ban the dipshits.  doodthing;

No
Title: Re: The "discuss Lawlz's numerous faults" thread
Post by: Tomboh on March 25, 2008, 05:54:56 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on March 25, 2008, 02:30:20 PM
Tito, black? He's fucking guatamalen, he's not even that dark. (sp.)
i thought he was like half black.