To raise money for starving children.
Did you know that 29,000 children die every day from hunger related causes?
Did you know that 1.6 Billion people live on less than one dollar a day?
Well now you do.
Fuck...you? doodthing;
baddood;
Did you know that 2% of the world's population owns 50% of the wealth?
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1222-04.htm
source before some one tries claiming i took it from immortal technique song.
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 05:32:37 PM
Did you know that 2% of the world's population owns 50% of the wealth?
Did you know the top 5% of the world consumes 86% of the food and services?
If they can never support themselves, let nature take them out.
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 06:49:14 PM
If they can never support themselves, let nature take them out.
With that attitude we'd all be dead.
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 06:50:59 PM
With that attitude we'd all be dead.
a kid is born without limbs and one lung
let live [y/n]
i say nay
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 06:56:12 PM
a kid is born without limbs and one lung
let live [y/n]
i say nay
You were born without the ability to support yourself. Why didn't nature take you out?
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 07:00:33 PM
You were born without the ability to support yourself. Why didn't nature take you out?
QuoteIf they can never support themselves, let nature take them out
lern2reed
how would that save kids that starve other than letting me eat it :(
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 07:09:56 PM
lern2reed
How do you know that the children would never be able to support themselves?
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 07:28:54 PM
How do you know that the children would never be able to support themselves?
because lawlz never learned how <3
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 07:28:54 PM
How do you know that the children would never be able to support themselves?
a continent of people given rice they can't even boil and apparently haven't learned to migrate over these thousands of years like the rest of humanity
should i be led to assume they'll someday create some ideal society or just get deeper in aids and dust
As for starving people outside of Africa, they have far greater chances of someday building up a good base for survival.
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 07:35:34 PM
As for starving people outside of Africa, they have far greater chances of someday building up a good base for survival.
And I wonder how many of the 29,000 dying per day are outside of Africa; I'm willing to get a nice amount. And I'd say a majority of the 1.6 billion mentioned are also outside of Africa.
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 07:37:29 PM
And I wonder how many of the 29,000 dying per day are outside of Africa; I'm willing to get a nice amount. And I'd say a majority of the 1.6 billion mentioned are also outside of Africa.
But when you consider that only about 5 people in Africa can buy or make their own meal, they make up a huge chunk.
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 07:38:51 PM
But when you consider that only about 5 people in Africa can buy or make their own meal, they make up a huge chunk.
Well, what are they supposed to do? They can't migrate out of Africa.
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 07:38:51 PM
But when you consider that only about 5 people in Africa can buy or make their own meal, they make up a huge chunk.
how do i hunt
Current world resources cannot sustain the entire population living close to first world standards, as such, social and economic evolution (human natural selection) does it's thing. Darwinism to the fullest..
Quote from: Socks on February 23, 2008, 08:33:13 PM
Current world resources cannot sustain the entire population living close to first world standards, as such, social and economic evolution (human natural selection) does it's thing. Darwinism to the fullest..
More like Social Darwinism, which is completely bad and wrong. doodthing;
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 09:02:46 PM
More like Social Darwinism, which is completely bad and wrong. doodthing;
Yes. And no it is not "bad and wrong". We can't sustain our population, some have to die.
Quote from: Socks on February 23, 2008, 09:24:13 PM
Yes. And no it is not "bad and wrong". We can't sustain our population, some have to die.
hi elitist
Some have to die when it is time for them to die; America, the current power, is too caught up in its own shit to even help Africa. It's not considered a profitable cause. Humans shouldn't be secluded as a designated population that "has to die off", it's human nature to help everyone as much as possible, unless they are a threat or enemy, and they're not.
That's great.
I ate some delicious chicken and doritos.
There have been times, und undoubtedly wil be win the future, where I've had to deal with 5 packages of ramen for a week. I guess it could be worse, but for me that is starving. Because of times like that, I would never give up food that's handed to me.
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 09:31:13 PM
hi elitist
Some have to die when it is time for them to die; America, the current power, is too caught up in its own shit to even help Africa. It's not considered a profitable cause. Humans shouldn't be secluded as a designated population that "has to die off", it's human nature to help everyone as much as possible, unless they are a threat or enemy, and they're not.
Save me tears and sentimental shit. This planet cannot sustain our current and ever expanding population with first world living standards. Unless you want to go live on the moon, some have to die. Simple truth, it is in fact unnatural to artificially help everyone survive, in nature, most die. There needs to be a balance, call me "elitist" all you want, at least I'm a realist.
Quote from: Socks on February 23, 2008, 09:46:57 PM
Save me tears and sentimental shit. This planet cannot sustain our current and ever expanding population with first world living standards. Unless you want to go live on the moon, some have to die. Simple truth, it is in fact unnatural to artificially help everyone survive, in nurture, most die. There needs to be a balance, call me "elitist" all you want, at least I'm a realist.
Well I'm a humanist so bleh. madood;
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 09:49:49 PM
Well I'm a humanist so bleh. madood;
Great, they've contributed jack shit to the world, apart from saving Monkeys in Africa.
Quote from: Socks on February 23, 2008, 09:59:54 PM
Great, they've contributed jack shit to the world, apart from saving Monkeys in Africa.
uhh monkeys aren't humans
unless this is a racial slur i am confused
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 10:01:34 PM
uhh monkeys aren't humans
unless this is a racial slur i am confused
Fuck it.
Quote from: Socks on February 23, 2008, 10:05:07 PM
Look up "Humanist". Hint, they "save"/"protect" other shit too.
ok, not necessarily
Ok. Hmmââ,¬Â¦ one minute passed... There go another couple hundred... Perfect.
Quote from: Socks on February 23, 2008, 10:10:33 PM
Ok. Hmmââ,¬Â¦ one minute passed... There go another couple hundred... Perfect.
300 were born. doodella;
But for some reason that sounds a little farfetched. doodthing;
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 09:31:13 PM
hi elitist
Some have to die when it is time for them to die; America, the current power, is too caught up in its own shit to even help Africa. It's not considered a profitable cause. Humans shouldn't be secluded as a designated population that "has to die off", it's human nature to help everyone as much as possible, unless they are a threat or enemy, and they're not.
Survival of those in our immediate area and of our social class is the most important thing of pretty much all social animals, aside from those ones that simply desire their personal survival.
It has nothing to do with them being black or anything; it's all about them living in an area that clearly can't sustain human life, yet we waste resources to support them and extend the suffering. If it wasn't for our "ethics," they'd be left to die and the strongest would survive. Africa
can support life, but we're forcing too many too survive on too little. Let the weakest die and then more food can be distributed and produced by those capable of survival.
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 10:13:56 PM
Survival of those in our immediate area and of our social class is the most important thing of pretty much all social animals, aside from those ones that simply desire their personal survival.
It has nothing to do with them being black or anything; it's all about them living in an area that clearly can't sustain human life, yet we waste resources to support them and extend the suffering. If it wasn't for our "ethics," they'd be left to die and the strongest would survive. Africa can support life, but we're forcing too many too survive on too little. Let the weakest die and then more food can be distributed and produced by those capable of survival.
when did i mention race?
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 09:02:46 PM
More like Social Darwinism, which is completely bad and wrong. doodthing;
Quote from: Nyerp on February 23, 2008, 10:15:19 PM
when did i mention race?
i was led to infer it for some raisin
A simpler solution would be to teach them how to get their own food.
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 10:16:42 PM
A simpler solution would be to teach them how to get their own food.
There's dirt, a stampede of elephants, and a cow in the immediate 100 mile radius.
How's that going to feed 3000 people?
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 10:16:08 PM
i was led to infer it for some raisin
oh meaty cocks
Quote from: Lawlz on February 23, 2008, 10:18:08 PM
There's dirt, a stampede of elephants, and a cow in the immediate 100 mile radius.
How's that going to feed 3000 people?
The wonders of modern science had discovered that plants grow in dirt.
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 11:22:03 PM
The wonders of modern science had discovered that plants grow in dirt.
It's not that simple, I'm talking more about the having them same lifestyle, resources, both natural and material etc... It can't be done, there are too many people
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 11:22:03 PM
The wonders of modern science had discovered that plants grow in dirt.
My science book says the bible was the source of modern science doodthing;
Quote from: Charmed on February 23, 2008, 11:31:21 PM
My science book says the bible was the source of modern science doodthing;
Is your science book The Bible?
Quote from: JMV290 on February 23, 2008, 11:22:03 PM
The wonders of modern science had discovered that plants grow in dirt.
It's also shown that plants require water to grow and that most of Africa lacks water, particularly that safe for consumption.
WE NEED AFRICAN OIL
why is it that 50% of the people we give food to will die from & spread aids
at least give food to starving people in different parts of the world, or at least people in africa that arent infected
doodella;