jk he'll just say cool
p.s. it won't be funny at all
cool
beat u 2 it
I don't have a problem with its rendering.
But it's slow as nuts. :|
acid 2
the mirror of acid 2
the other mirror of acid 2
I love Guff.
It used to do it to http://www.serebii.net/index2.shtml but it's fixed.
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 03:55:46 PM
But it's slow as nuts. :|
speed comparisons please
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 03:57:02 PM
acid 2
the mirror of acid 2
the other mirror of acid 2
oh okay okay you win
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/1599/picture3cj9.png)
Again, there's nothing wrong with FireFox, just not very fast.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 03:57:02 PM
acid 2
the mirror of acid 2
the other mirror of acid 2
HELLO WORLD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
O O
DDDDDDDDDDDDDD
DDDDDDDDD
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:00:48 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/1599/picture3cj9.png)
Again, there's nothing wrong with FireFox, just not very fast.
(http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/2268/2002580369916287042rsoc3.jpg)
My test shows otherwise
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:00:48 PM
Again, there's nothing wrong with FireFox, just not very fast.
Wow, 1.6 times the speed. And the average page takes how long to render in the first place?
and isn't opera supposed to be faster psyduck;
Quote from: Charles A. Reiss on August 22, 2007, 04:04:31 PM
(http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/2268/2002580369916287042rsoc3.jpg)
My test shows otherwise
hilarious
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 22, 2007, 04:05:28 PM
Wow, 1.6 times the speed. And the average page takes how long to render in the first place?
and isn't opera supposed to be faster psyduck;
You would think so.
Quote from: Charles A. Reiss on August 22, 2007, 04:04:31 PM
(http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/2268/2002580369916287042rsoc3.jpg)
My test shows otherwise
Reefer for Sage.
Why is it that Safari takes a lot longer to open and it takes quite a while to open the first page.
It seems slower than Firefox.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 04:07:16 PM
Why is it that Safari takes a lot longer to open and it takes quite a while to open the first page.
It seems slower than Firefox.
y dunt u look at the chart I just showed. And here's launch speed:
(http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9526/picture4go7.png)
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:08:42 PM
y dunt u look at the chart I just showed. And here's launch speed:
(http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9526/picture4go7.png)
Firefox launches almost instantaneous for me.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 04:07:16 PM
Why is it that Safari takes a lot longer to open and it takes quite a while to open the first page.
It seems slower than Firefox.
Individual results can and will vary. And the test they performed was done on only one system.
irrelevant because it can pass acid2 test :|
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:00:48 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/1599/picture3cj9.png)
Again, there's nothing wrong with FireFox, just not very fast.
Apple says Safari is the best Windows browser.
SPOILERS:[spoiler]It's not.[/spoiler]
Firefox is the slowest Mac browser, regardless of whether you're running a PPC or Intel. They just slapped it up to make Microsoft look bad.
Also, that's the chart for Windows. It's much, much, much slower on OS X.
Also, cocks.
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 22, 2007, 04:10:46 PM
Individual results can and will vary. And the test they performed was done on only one system.
irrelevant because it can pass acid2 test :|
Because if I can't see acid2, I can't see any website ever.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:12:28 PM
Firefox is the slowest Mac browser, regardless of whether you're running a PPC or Intel.
actual statistics please
Oh, and I'm still waiting on the list of sites.
Oh, explain the differences between Fedora and Ubuntu, too.
brb waiting for lawlz to not post
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:12:28 PM
Also, cocks.
Shut up.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 04:07:16 PM
Why is it that Safari takes a lot longer to open and it takes quite a while to open the first page.
It seems slower than Firefox.
I think that's just in Windows. Safari for Windows isn't very good.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:12:28 PM
Firefox is the slowest Mac browser, regardless of whether you're running a PPC or Intel. They just slapped it up to make Microsoft look bad.
Also, that's the chart for Windows. It's much, much, much slower on OS X.
Yet many seem to have no problem with Firefox on Mac. Hey, aren't you the guy who bashes Windows and Ubuntu all the time?
cool how now ur bashing a browsr not by apple
bbs still waiting
Quote from: Bassir C. on August 22, 2007, 04:30:23 PM
Yet many seem to have no problem with Firefox on Mac.
Most Mac users are Windows converts and know jack shit. Then there are the fools that assume open source=god, and have never heard of far superior open source browsers like Shiira. Just group them with retards.
QuoteHey, aren't you the guy who bashes Windows
Nope, that'd be you.
Quoteand Ubuntu all the time?
Because it's nowhere near as good as you make it out to be.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:35:35 PM
Because it's nowhere near as good as you make it out to be.
Explain the differences between it and Fedora, which you seem to prefer.
I'm not really understanding the benefit of an open-source browser to your average user psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:35:35 PM
Then there are the fools that assume open source=god
Everyone knows Open Source things are the best, they're free, and people can change things to personalize it for themselves. If we didn't have open source we'd still be with IE and Safari. Soon Songbird will take over this piece of shit iTunes media player.
Songbird uses VLC to play the songs/videos so I approve and you should too Lawlz. Just as long as they release it within my lifespan.
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 22, 2007, 04:36:46 PM
Explain the differences between it and Fedora, which you seem to prefer.
One of the two don't suck.
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:36:58 PM
I'm not really understanding the benefit of an open-source browser to your average user psyduck;
The average user doesn't understand either. Hell, there really isn't much of a benefit for using an open source browser at all when there are superior, proprietary options like Opera. Except Shiira, which is greater than pretty much everything.
Also, the average person thinks Windows is the greatest thing ever... So of course, there are a few retards that think Mozilla is the greatest thing ever.
Quote from: Charles A. Reiss on August 22, 2007, 04:38:23 PM
Everyone knows Open Source things are the best, they're free, and people can change things to personalize it for themselves. If we didn't have open source we'd still be with IE and Safari. Soon Songbird will take over this piece of shit iTunes media player.
Songbird uses VLC to play the songs/videos so I approve and you should too Lawlz. Just as long as they release it within my lifespan.
I lol'd at this entire post. Seriously.
Who would truly take GIMP over Photoshop? Who would truly take Ubuntu over Mac OS X?
Also, Songbird is the most god-awful piece of shit to ever exist. Oh god, I hate it. Well, maybe not as much as the PS1, but they're pretty close.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
One of the two don't suck.The average user doesn't understand either. Hell, there really isn't much of a benefit for using an open source browser at all when there are superior, proprietary options like Opera. Except Shiira, which is greater than pretty much everything.
Also, the average person thinks Windows is the greatest thing ever... So of course, there are a few retards that think Mozilla is the greatest thing ever.I lol'd at this entire post. Seriously.
Who would truly take GIMP over Photoshop? Who would truly take Ubuntu over Mac OS X?
Also, Songbird is the most god-awful piece of shit to ever exist. Oh god, I hate it.
I went back to Safari, if there isn't a true noticeable speed difference, I don't see the point of keeping it on my hard drive.
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:42:26 PM
I went back to Safari, if there isn't a true noticeable speed difference, I don't see the point of keeping it on my hard drive.
I loved the sidebar and image scaling. Too bad Safari 3 killed the latter feature and made it slower than molasses.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:43:14 PM
I loved the sidebar and image scaling. Too bad Safari 3 killed the latter feature and made it slower than molasses.
I didn't really understand the usefulness of the sidebar.
Okay, Shiira's a great browser... but Firefox doesn't really "suck".
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:35:35 PM
Most Mac users are Windows converts and know jack shit. Then there are the fools that assume open source=god, and have never heard of far superior open source browsers like Shiira. Just group them with retards.
Nope, that'd be you.
Because it's nowhere near as good as you make it out to be.
And I assume Solaris is better? Why? Because it's a !@!$!$%#$Nixxx system.
yeah thats pretty cool i guess
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 22, 2007, 04:36:46 PM
Explain the differences between it and Fedora, which you seem to prefer.
fedora uses gnome thats cool
Lawlz, if Shiira is so perfect why is it that the most recent versions are riddled with problems, such as displaying animated GIFs? You even recommended older versions of it because you said 2.2 sucks. If you can pick and choose which versions to support in your claims of browser superiority then the same can be said for Firefox. Firefox 3 passes the Acid 2 test.
edit: lol i made a lot of typos
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:36:58 PM
I'm not really understanding the benefit of an open-source browser to your average user psyduck;
There isn't much. That's not to say there are any disadvantages, though.
Ideologically, and monetarily,
I prefer open source. Closed source is bad enough, but closed source that makes extensive use of open-source components (OS X itself, Safari, etc.) just sucks. ugly;
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
One of the two don't suck.
Explain why, you fucking idiot.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
Who would truly take GIMP over Photoshop?
hi
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
Who would truly take Ubuntu over Mac OS X?
hi
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
Also, Songbird is the most god-awful piece of shit to ever exist. Oh god, I hate it.
why
Also, who the fuck would use the shitting damn BSD components in OS X? psyduck;
Oh, right. OS X.
Still waiting on a list of sites.
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:43:52 PM
I didn't really understand the usefulness of the sidebar.
Keeps everything neat and organized, and you don't need to have a window or tab opened for every single little thing you need to do.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 04:44:28 PM
Lawlz, if Shiira is so perfect why is it that the most recent versions are riddle with problems involving animated GIFs? You even recommended older versions of it because you said 2.2 sucks. If you can pick and choose which versions to support in your claims of browser superiority then the same can be said for Firefox. Firefox 3 passes the Acid 3 test.
Shiira has no problems with GIFs. The problem is people have animation turned off.
Also, I didn't use the 2.x versions of Shiira until after I got Safari 3. Overall, it's pretty sweet, but it suffers a speed drop because of the Safari beta. Had I not installed it, I know it would've been much better. And Firefox 3 doesn't exist. Shiira 1.2.2 does.
Nice try, though.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
One of the two don't suck.The average user doesn't understand either. Hell, there really isn't much of a benefit for using an open source browser at all when there are superior, proprietary options like Opera. Except Shiira, which is greater than pretty much everything.
Also, the average person thinks Windows is the greatest thing ever... So of course, there are a few retards that think Mozilla is the greatest thing ever.I lol'd at this entire post. Seriously.
Who would truly take GIMP over Photoshop? Who would truly take Ubuntu over Mac OS X?
Also, Songbird is the most god-awful piece of shit to ever exist. Oh god, I hate it. Well, maybe not as much as the PS1, but they're pretty close.
I lold at both these points.
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:46:47 PM
Keeps everything neat and organized, and you don't need to have a window or tab opened for every single little thing you need to do.Shiira has no problems with GIFs. The problem is people have animation turned off.
Also, I didn't use the 2.x versions of Shiira until after I got Safari 3. Overall, it's pretty sweet, but it suffers a speed drop because of the Safari beta. Had I not installed it, I know it would've been much better. And Firefox 3 doesn't exist. Shiira 1.2.2 does.
Nice try, though.
http://download.mozilla.org/?product=granparadiso-alpha7&os=linux&lang=en-US
cool
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
I lol'd at this entire post. Seriously.
Who would truly take GIMP over Photoshop? Who would truly take Ubuntu over Mac OS X?
Also, Songbird is the most god-awful piece of shit to ever exist. Oh god, I hate it. Well, maybe not as much as the PS1, but they're pretty close.
I never said all things open source are better than all things non-open. Songbird is still in beta though if it ever is released in a full version I'll download it asap. Right now it's horrible.
Photoshop > GIMP
Mac OS X or Vista ??? Linux
IE < Firefox
Safari < Shiira
AIM < Miranda IM
See? Not everything open source is better but in my opinion most open source things are better.
gtfo
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:46:47 PM
And Firefox 3 doesn't exist.
Nothing exists, you idiot. You're an acosmist. psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:46:47 PM
And Firefox 3 doesn't exist.
It's in alpha or beta phase but okay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox
QuoteAlthough Firefox 2 does not pass the Acid2 standards-compliance test, development builds of Firefox 3 do.[28]
Quote from: Fucking idiot. on August 22, 2007, 04:00:48 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/1599/picture3cj9.png)
Again, there's nothing wrong with FireFox, just not very fast.
oh lawd is that my precious IE being that fast?
Quote from: V on August 22, 2007, 05:35:36 PM
oh lawd is that my precious IE being that fast?
Uh, it's not fast. psyduck;
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 22, 2007, 05:39:27 PM
Uh, it's not fast. psyduck;
Well, you can't blame him. The graph isn't labeled.
V, that is how many seconds it takes.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 05:42:33 PM
Well, you can't blame him. The graph isn't labeled.
V, that is how many seconds it takes.
okie i see.
Quote from: Rodrigo Fiorentini on August 22, 2007, 05:42:33 PM
Well, you can't blame him. The graph isn't labeled.
V, that is how many seconds it takes.
According to Apple.
okay back
nvm brb still waiting on lawlz to answer
Why the hell do you people care what browser/os people use? psyduck;
ITT Lawlz avoids questions he can't answer
Quote from: Lawlz on August 22, 2007, 04:41:20 PM
Who would truly take GIMP over Photoshop? Who would truly take Ubuntu over Mac OS X?
Many people, you idiot.
Quote from: iWolf on August 22, 2007, 06:03:56 PM
Why the hell do you people care what browser/os people use? psyduck;
Well, I don't truly care. It's what people say about other browsers for no reason that boils my blood.