Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 03:38:35 PM

Title: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 03:38:35 PM
Yankees. hurr;
[spoiler]Also, Sony.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Also, Microsoft.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Also, Firefox.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Also, Reaper. gooncamp;[/spoiler]
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Reverse Psychology on August 20, 2007, 03:39:35 PM
Yankees suck. srs
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 03:39:55 PM
Quote from: quasar on August 20, 2007, 03:39:35 PM
Yankees suck. srs
i no srsly
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: iWolf on August 20, 2007, 03:40:33 PM
Explain why you think Firefox sucks.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: YPrrrr on August 20, 2007, 03:41:34 PM
I love how you can take stuff you say everyday and make a thread about it.

The originality is refreshing.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 03:42:09 PM
Quote from: iWolf on August 20, 2007, 03:40:33 PM
Explain why you think Firefox sucks.
(http://files.myopera.com/vinczej/files/FF_Acid2_test.jpg)

Also, I can run IE 5 faster under emulation on OS 9 than I can run Firefox for OS X at "native" speed.
Quote from: Your Posting Rival on August 20, 2007, 03:41:34 PM
I love how you can take stuff you say everyday and make a thread about it.

The originality is refreshing.
Define the average Boyah topic, cockfag.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Tomboh on August 20, 2007, 03:43:15 PM
Also, Sega.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Daddy on August 20, 2007, 03:43:43 PM
firefox can't render one site it sux. crai;


And were you running OS X on an intel Mac or a PPC?
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: YPrrrr on August 20, 2007, 03:43:53 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:42:09 PM
(http://files.myopera.com/vinczej/files/FF_Acid2_test.jpg)

Also, I can run IE 5 faster under emulation on OS 9 than I can run Firefox for OS X at "native" speed.Define the average Boyah topic, cockfag.
Average Boyah Topic: Lul! Look at my copy and paste from:
a. outsider
b. youtube
c. nsider
d. two days ago
e. all of the above
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 03:44:59 PM
Quote from: JMV290 on August 20, 2007, 03:43:43 PM
firefox can't render one site it sux. crai;


And were you running OS X on an intel Mac or a PPC?
This is  a PPC, cockshit. And Firefox runs like shit, regardless of the processor.
Quote from: Ohbotm on August 20, 2007, 03:43:15 PM
Also, Sega.
You and LinkJGE are both retards. spam;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Daddy on August 20, 2007, 03:46:12 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:44:59 PM
This is  a PPC, cockshit. And Firefox runs like shit, regardless of the processor.
Have you tried running both on an Intel Mac?
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Placebo Headwound on August 20, 2007, 03:48:12 PM
Also, anything that isn't from Sega or Apple. spam;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Wrench on August 20, 2007, 03:49:16 PM
I agree that the Yankees, and Microsoft suck.
[spoiler]Also, Reaper mango[/spoiler]
I like Sony and Firefox is good enough.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 20, 2007, 03:50:23 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:42:09 PM
(http://files.myopera.com/vinczej/files/FF_Acid2_test.jpg)
Name some actual sites that Safari, Opera, et al. render correctly which Firefox does not.  psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:42:09 PM
Also, I can run IE 5 faster under emulation on OS 9 than I can run Firefox for OS X at "native" speed.
Therefore, it somehow sucks on *nix and Windows systems, too.  psyduck;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 03:51:42 PM
Quote from: JMV290 on August 20, 2007, 03:46:12 PM
Have you tried running both on an Intel Mac?
Both what? OS X and Firefox? OS 9 and IE 5?

And as I said, Firefox sucks regardless of processor. I've tested everything, and Mozilla is comprised of dumbasses.
Quote from: Thief888 on August 20, 2007, 03:48:12 PM
Also, anything that isn't from Sega or Apple. spam;
Or NEC, Sun Microsystems, Bell Labs, or Nintendo. spam;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Daddy on August 20, 2007, 03:55:04 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:51:42 PM
Both what? OS X and Firefox? OS 9 and IE 5?
Yes.  I'm sure that IE5 would work better on a PPC than Firefox would.  I'm also sure that you'd have different results when you use an Intel.

Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:51:42 PM
And as I said, Firefox sucks regardless of processor. I've tested everything, and Mozilla is comprised of dumbasses.
Then why is it that the only problem I  have with Firefox is its memory leak?
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: YPrrrr on August 20, 2007, 03:55:12 PM
Racists
Whores
People who actually care whether you use a mac, pc, firefox, ie, etc.
Hoovers
President Bush
Genocide
etc. etc.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 20, 2007, 03:56:25 PM
Quote from: JMV290 on August 20, 2007, 03:55:04 PM
Then why is it that the only problem I  have with Firefox is its memory leak?
Because you're an idiot.

Nigger.

srsly
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Daddy on August 20, 2007, 03:59:28 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 20, 2007, 03:56:25 PM
Because you're an idiot.

Nigger.

srsly
lol Lawlz. spam;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 20, 2007, 04:04:42 PM
Quote from: JMV290 on August 20, 2007, 03:55:04 PM
Yes.  I'm sure that IE5 would work better on a PPC than Firefox would.  I'm also sure that you'd have different results when you use an Intel.
Then why is it that the only problem I  have with Firefox is its memory leak?
Why exactly should IE5 for OS 9 work better on a PPC Mac running OS X than Firefox for OS X?

Notice how I said processor, not OS. Firefox sucks for Intel and PPC Macs. It sucks for every and all versions of Mac OS. IE 5 is for OS 9. OS 9 can only be run on PPC Macs. OS 9 can only be run on a G4 or G5 Mac under emulation.

Now, explain why a web browser being run under emulation should run faster than a piece of shit running on the OS it was built for.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 20, 2007, 04:06:52 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 04:04:42 PM
Why exactly should IE5 for OS 9 work better on a PPC Mac running OS X than Firefox for OS X?

Now, explain why a web browser being run under emulation should run faster than a piece of shit running on the OS it was built for.
Give some actual numbers to support that claim.

Also, you've still yet to give any examples of web sites other than the Acid2 test that Firefox doesn't render correctly.  psyduck;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Daddy on August 20, 2007, 04:12:18 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 04:04:42 PM
Why exactly should IE5 for OS 9 work better on a PPC Mac running OS X than Firefox for OS X?

Notice how I said processor, not OS. Firefox sucks for Intel and PPC Macs. It sucks for every and all versions of Mac OS. IE 5 is for OS 9. OS 9 can only be run on PPC Macs. OS 9 can only be run on a G4 or G5 Mac under emulation.

Now, explain why a web browser being run under emulation should run faster than a piece of shit running on the OS it was built for.
Now run them both on the same operating system and compare.

You've still failed to explain why it sucks other than the fact that it can't pass the acid 2 test, which should be changing next month when milestone 8 is launched.   

Were you running both OS 9 and OS X on the same machine?   Both OS 9 and IE 5 are older and thus work better on machines with less RAM than the new OS and browser.   Now if both have the same amount of RAM the older system will run faster, it has all of that extra RAM to use.

You can't make a comparison of 2 programs unless everything is the same: specs, OS, temperature of the machine, and such.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Tomboh on August 20, 2007, 04:12:22 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 20, 2007, 03:44:59 PM
You and LinkJGE are both retards. spam;
If I don't have shitty tastes in games like you, I must be retarded.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Placebo Headwound on August 20, 2007, 04:13:41 PM
Quote from: Ohbotm on August 20, 2007, 04:12:22 PM
If I don't have shitty tastes in games like you, I must be retarded.
Because Lawlz's opinion is fact. navi;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 20, 2007, 04:17:05 PM
Quote from: Thief888 on August 20, 2007, 04:13:41 PM
Because Lawlz's opinion is fact. navi;
I doubt most, if any, of that is actually his opinion.  He's just a troll.  psyduck;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: V on August 20, 2007, 05:19:12 PM
FANBOYISM AT ITS FINEST.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on August 20, 2007, 09:39:06 PM
lol nintender fanboy
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: V on August 20, 2007, 10:38:32 PM
Quote from: Title on August 20, 2007, 10:38:04 PM
psyduck;


stop it with smiley posts gray
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 21, 2007, 03:12:08 AM
Quote from: JMV290 on August 20, 2007, 04:12:18 PM
 Both OS 9 and IE 5 are older and thus work better on machines with less RAM than the new OS and browser.
EMULATION

Wow, since the Wii has lower specs than my Mac, games for it must run gloriously under emulation on my Mac. It's a proven fact, folks.

Running IE5 on a machine running solely OS9 will be run at full speed. Running it on my Mac, under emulation through OS X, only runs at about 70% of that speed or less. Firefox, running natively on OS X,  runs slower than GCF in gym class.

tl;dr, I have raisin to believe you're retarded.
QuoteYou can't make a comparison of 2 programs unless everything is the same: specs, OS, temperature of the machine, and such.

WHICH IS FASTER: A GAMECUBE PLAYING RE4 OR RE4 BEING PLAYED THROUGH A GAMECUBE EMULATOR FOR YOUR PC?

I suppose such a comparison isn't permitted. Regardless, Firefox is the slowest Mac browser to exist. Something being run under emulation should be running slower, which it is, yet it's still faster than a native app.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 21, 2007, 12:39:12 PM
Hey, asshole.  Answer me. psyduck;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: superclucky on August 21, 2007, 12:50:35 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 21, 2007, 12:39:12 PM
Hey, asshole.  Answer me. psyduck;
are u trying to make him explode
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 21, 2007, 03:47:13 PM
Lawlz, I'm still waiting. psyduck;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: ncba93ivyase on August 21, 2007, 03:48:32 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on August 21, 2007, 03:47:13 PM
Lawlz, I'm still waiting. psyduck;
I'M NOT HORNY NOW.
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: Placebo Headwound on August 21, 2007, 03:49:47 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 21, 2007, 03:48:32 PM
I'M NOT HORNY NOW.
I saw that coming. navi;
Title: Re: u no wut SUX
Post by: guff on August 21, 2007, 04:04:06 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on August 21, 2007, 03:48:32 PM
I'M NOT HORNY NOW.
Shut up.

Name some pages.

not necessarily in that order