(http://www.iian.ibeam.com/events/thom001/22876/browser/slides/20070726084721294707/default_large/Slide45.JPG)
I'm not an AMD Fanboy, although I use an AMD Opteron, right now I would buy a Core 2 for the extra performance, but AMD looks like it'll outdo Intel again. Then Intel will drive down its prices even more to compete, and they'll speed up production of whatever they're working on. Everyone wins! :)
NEEDS FONT SMOOTHING
Quote from: Lawlz on August 08, 2007, 11:10:26 PM
NEEDS FONT SMOOTHING
Lol.
Anyway, uh yay? You buy a new processor everytime a new one comes out?
Quote from: Blaziken Prince on August 08, 2007, 11:11:46 PM
Lol.
Anyway, uh yay? You buy a new processor everytime a new one comes out?
No, I got myself stuck on Socket 939. D:
I believe Socket AM2 will be able to run the new AMD Phenom Processors, but Socket 939 is left out in the cold. :(
Quote from: Kingoftherings on August 08, 2007, 11:17:06 PM
No, I got myself stuck on Socket 939. D:
I believe Socket AM2 will be able to run the new AMD Phenom Processors, but Socket 939 is left out in the cold. :(
I dont even know what the hell socket my P4 is in >.>
Quote from: Blaziken Prince on August 08, 2007, 11:18:10 PM
I dont even know what the hell socket my P4 is in >.>
Either Socket 478 or LGA 775.
Try http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
Quote from: Kingoftherings on August 08, 2007, 11:21:33 PM
Either Socket 478 or LGA 775.
Try http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
I already had that program also, I just never bother runnimg it unless I need to.
Quote from: Blaziken Prince on August 08, 2007, 11:25:14 PM
I already had that program also, I just never bother runnimg it unless I need to.
But if I had to guess, I'd say 478. I've never seen anybody with an LGA775 Pentium 4 system. XD
Quote from: Kingoftherings on August 08, 2007, 11:30:28 PM
But if I had to guess, I'd say 478. I've never seen anybody with an LGA775 Pentium 4 system. XD
I just looked, and yes, it's a 478.
Quote from: Blaziken Prince on August 08, 2007, 11:37:31 PM
I just looked, and yes, it's a 478.
Thats even worse than 939. pseudo;
Quote from: Kingoftherings on August 08, 2007, 11:40:26 PM
Thats even worse than 939. pseudo;
Error 404: Care not found hax;
AMD and Intel suck. gooncamp;
Quote from: Lawlz on August 08, 2007, 11:41:34 PM
AMD and Intel suck. gooncamp;
So what do you use then?
Quote from: Blaziken Prince on August 08, 2007, 11:43:10 PM
So what do you use then?
That leaves IBM's PPC and Sun's SPARC, with possibly a few lesser known manufacturers. Take a guess. caterpie;
Quote from: Lawlz on August 08, 2007, 11:46:42 PM
That leaves IBM's PPC and Sun's SPARC, with possibly a few lesser known manufacturers. Take a guess. caterpie;
Hamster
When they have to brag about performance per watt, that generally means overall performance is lower than the one they're comparing it to.
Also, Opteron is a server processor. Not something for your everyday machine.
Quote from: Genius on August 09, 2007, 12:14:57 AM
When they have to brag about performance per watt, that generally means overall performance is lower than the one they're comparing it to.
Also, Opteron is a server processor. Not something for your everyday machine.
I use in Opteron in my everyday computer. flower;
And the other test shows it outperforms Intel's Xeon, its not much info, but its really all I've seen so far. :(