who is ron paul

[??????]

who is he
why is he so 'praised'
is it true that the media is trying to censor him for his favoritism towards ending the 'war on drugs'

lol help so i can appear attractive to a nut

[silvertone]

he is the ronald reagon of our generation

[snoorkel]

admit it. the veiled fantasy of every ron paul fan or even casual admirer: liberty will set the american public on fire, in the person of one ron paul, “congressman noâ€�. the timing is perfect â€" self-styled republicans bailing on “the partyâ€�, a growing anti-losing-war stance (i.e., not pro peace), record levels of disgust in the “war on drugsâ€�, and …

ron paul fan? give up now. a ron paul candidacy for US president would perhaps be the world’s most expensive semi-voluntarily-financed failed education program. there’s nothing he can offer beyond that, except a massive demonstration of principle failure from those who call themselves anything along the lines of voluntarists.

support a constitutionally weak US executive? okay, then what is president paul going to do other than invalidate most of the pile of “executive orders� polluting the world (itself a dubious proposal), and send out to staples for a rubber stamp “VETO�?

i found this on the internet i don't know what it means

[silvertone]

admit it. the veiled fantasy of every ron paul fan or even casual admirer: liberty will set the american public on fire, in the person of one ron paul, “congressman noâ€�. the timing is perfect â€" self-styled republicans bailing on “the partyâ€�, a growing anti-losing-war stance (i.e., not pro peace), record levels of disgust in the “war on drugsâ€�, and …

ron paul fan? give up now. a ron paul candidacy for US president would perhaps be the world’s most expensive semi-voluntarily-financed failed education program. there’s nothing he can offer beyond that, except a massive demonstration of principle failure from those who call themselves anything along the lines of voluntarists.

support a constitutionally weak US executive? okay, then what is president paul going to do other than invalidate most of the pile of “executive orders� polluting the world (itself a dubious proposal), and send out to staples for a rubber stamp “VETO�?

i found this on the internet i don't know what it means

he is too libertarian

[snoorkel]

but he's Mr. Consistent

[silvertone]

consistently retarded lmao!!!!

[Daddy]

Consistency is only good if you are willing to change your views if you happen to be wrong at times.

Consistency for sake of consistency is no better than politicians "flip flopping" on issus (I'd say it's even worse since politicians are elected to represent us so if they 'flip flop' on an issue to appeal to the masses then they are representing an issue supported by the masses).


Take his views on OSHA and FLSA.  He has been "consistent" in opposition to those regardless of their positive or negative effects on the economy and standards of living for americans.  An ideal politician would have the guts to admit he were wrong on an issue even if it makes him look "weak" for changing his stance.


It happens in science. If someone supports a hypothesis or theory that is proven wrong or superseded by another, more accurate one no one (except maybe Christian Evangelical Apologists) says "but to his credit he is consistent in his support for that conjecture".

[snoorkel]

Consistency is only good if you are willing to change your views if you happen to be wrong at times.

Consistency for sake of consistency is no better than politicians "flip flopping" on issus (I'd say it's even worse since politicians are elected to represent us so if they 'flip flop' on an issue to appeal to the masses then they are representing an issue supported by the masses).


Take his views on OSHA and FLSA.  He has been "consistent" in opposition to those regardless of their positive or negative effects on the economy and standards of living for americans.  An ideal politician would have the guts to admit he were wrong on an issue even if it makes him look "weak" for changing his stance.


It happens in science. If someone supports a hypothesis or theory that is proven wrong or superseded by another, more accurate one no one (except maybe Christian Evangelical Apologists) says "but to his credit he is consistent in his support for that conjecture".

well ya. i was Mr. Joke (maybe you are too and its to deep, if so, applause lamp) _

i just think we should have a white/non muslim president,. i mean its america come on. the country was founded by liars and thieves so why dont we elect a liar and a thief instead of all this " HEALTH CARE " bs. I dont want health care???

[??????]

he is the ronald reagon of our generation

this literally was my thought
"is he like the ronald reagon of today"

[snoorkel]

this literally was my thought
"is he like the ronald reagon of today"

no he stands for Freedom u should read his book.

[??????]

reading STiNKS

[snoorkel]

you don't have to "read" it to READ it, if you know what I mean

[??????]

like reading wikipedia pages without actually reading them

[Daddy]

RON PAUL

DENNIS KUCINICH 2012


BECAUZE IT WILL WORK OUT WHEN PEOPLE AHVE 2 COMPLETELY CONFLICTING VIEWPOINTS EXCEPT FOR DRUGS AND WAR.

[silvertone]

and homosexuality. The Only Thing that Matters