LOGIC FUN

[?????]

Explain why this is wrong:

Nothing is better than a good sandwich.
A bad sandwich is better than nothing.
Therefore, a bad sandwich is better than a good sandwich.
DO IT FOR THE ACTIVITY

[Travis]

it's wrong because nothing is better than a good sandwich but a bad sandwich is better than nothing therefore it's wrong

[Nyerp]

the conclusion should be "therefore, a bad sandwich is better than a good sandwich"

[?????]

it's wrong because nothing is better than a good sandwich but a bad sandwich is better than nothing therefore it's wrong

Soo... what's the explanation?

the conclusion should be "therefore, a bad sandwich is better than a good sandwich"

DERP thanks

[Travis]

THAT IS THE EXPLANATION

THINK OF "NOTHING" AS AN OBJECT

[?????]

THAT IS THE EXPLANATION

THINK OF "NOTHING" AS AN OBJECT

k but you said
NOTHING better than GOOD
BAD better than GOOD

all you did was restate what i said

[Travis]

STOP CONFUSING ME

[?????]

STOP CONFUSING ME

YOU'RE CONFUSING ME

explain why it's wrong gogogo

[Classic]

This puzzle sucks.


Puzzle Solved!

[?????]

K, solve my puzzle now.

[Mando Pandango]

In each case, the word "nothing" has a different definition. The first sentence means "There is not a single thing that is better than a good sandwich." The second sentence means "Having a bad sandwich is better than not having anything at all."

Porblem sulvd.

[?????]

WINNER

LEVEL TWO:

The hand touches the pen.
The pen touches the paper.
The hand touches the paper.

[Mando Pandango]

Logical fallacy. Allow me to explain.

Say I were to say that there are three colored circles on a piece of paper. The green overlaps the blue. The blue overlaps the red. So the green must overlap the red, right?

[spoiler][/spoiler]

[Cookie]

The hand is the paper

[?????]

Popsicle wins again.

All men are mortal.
Socrates is a mortal.
Socrates is a man.