November 20, 2024, 01:16:52 AM

1,531,352 Posts in 46,734 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


WHY DAMMIT

Started by ?????, November 01, 2010, 07:17:16 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

?????

Why do we need to have 'u's after 'q's? Why not just qeen instead of queen? Seriously dammit.
Die for Dethklok

Daddy


?????

I'm not including foreign words. Did that make sense? Words without Arabic origins?
Die for Dethklok

don't let's


wawi


?????

Quote from: Live Is Dead on November 01, 2010, 07:19:55 PM
keen


No, I want to use Q

Quote from: Kapitän Deutschland on November 01, 2010, 07:20:25 PM
pronunciation


This doesn't make sense. Change the way Q is pronounced? Imply a u and not require it?
Die for Dethklok

C.Mongler

qu makes a kwuh sound, plain old q makes a kuh sound.

?????

Quote from: Си. Ð"он''гл'‹', on November 01, 2010, 07:38:03 PM
qu makes a kwuh sound, plain old q makes a kuh sound.


post above yours

change pronunciation or imply a u (same as the first)
Die for Dethklok

Dullahan


?????

Die for Dethklok

ME##

Ik think Englisc should go back to its Dutch roots.

?????

Quote from: Ã,mbørthümbsee on November 01, 2010, 07:59:53 PM
Ik think Englisc should go back to its Dutch roots.
Uh no.. it's just that stupid thing that doesn't really have any point.
Die for Dethklok

Nyerp

"q" by itself never implies a "kwuh" sound

you're fucking stupid

?????

Quote from: Nyerp on November 01, 2010, 08:31:29 PM
"q" by itself never implies a "kwuh" sound

you're fucking stupid


I'm saying that it should  doodhuh;
Die for Dethklok

[REDACTED]

Quote from: Ã,mbørthümbsee on November 01, 2010, 07:59:53 PM
Ik think Englisc should go back to its Dutch roots.
West Germanic roots :|
I do not have HIV/AIDS.

Go Up