im surprised this thread hasnt been made yet

[ncba93ivyase]

I don't like any of them, but since I have to vote for someone I'm voting for John McCain come November. Obama has no solid plans and experience, he's just good at being a speaker, wow so amazing. Hillary has a vagina and I dislike Bill so.

McCain is just like FUCK YEAH AMURICAH WAR

War benefits no one but business [owners] and Republicans seem to only go for what benefits those with the heaps of cash. Even if Obama is only good at speeches, McCain is good for nothing.

also, i've noticed the less educated the individual, the more likely they are to vote for the more conservative candidate

[Houdini]

also, i've noticed the less educated the individual, the more likely they are to vote for the more conservative candidate

Which is incredibly ironic considering Republicans tend to act solely in the interest of rich individuals and businesses.

[ncba93ivyase]

Thats America for you, idiotic conservatives who hump the hell out of religion and hate immigrants.

Another thing I don't get is why southerners (most of which are poor, uneducated bastards) always go for republicans when it's usually democrats that try to work for the general populace and republicans for the people in Hollywood and in charge of businesses.

Which is incredibly ironic considering Republicans tend to act solely in the interest of rich individuals and businesses.

You've stolen my post before I made it. :'(

[Himu]

I guess Obama.

[Socks]

McCain is just like FUCK YEAH AMURICAH WAR

Umm no, he just does not want to remove the option nor ask anyone permission to defend the US. He is a military veteran who served in Vietnam and was a POW, you don't rush into war after having experienced something like that.

War benefits no one but business [owners] and Republicans seem to only go for what benefits those with the heaps of cash.

That is a huge over simplification and I have no interest to argue this with someone who thinks war can never be a necessary evil. US foreign policy has not changed since Truman, no matter who has been in office Republicans or Democrats, such generalizations are silly.

Even if Obama is only good at speeches, McCain is good for nothing.

Clearly you have not  studied who has accomplished more in the political arena and who has more experience with geo political matters. I don't want to hear sugar coated messages and promises from Obama with no real concrete plans on how he aims to achieve them.

also, i've noticed the less educated the individual, the more likely they are to vote for the more conservative candidate

Eh, maybe, I don't really know but it's irrelevant to the discussion of which candidate is better.

[ME##]

Hillary Clinton     - 1 (5.6%)

sfd

[Title27GT]

Hillary Clinton     - 1 (5.6%)

sfd

cool dude way to draw attention to yourself in a completely random and irrelevant way

[ncba93ivyase]

Umm no, he just does not want to remove the option nor ask anyone permission to defend the US. He is a military veteran who served in Vietnam and was a POW, you don't rush into war after having experienced something like that.

That is a huge over simplification and I have no interest to argue this with someone who thinks war can never be a necessary evil. US foreign policy has not changed since Truman, no matter who has been in office Republicans or Democrats, such generalizations are silly.

Clearly you have not  studied who has accomplished more in the political arena and who has more experience with geo political matters. I don't want to hear sugar coated messages and promises from Obama with no real concrete plans on how he aims to achieve them.

Eh, maybe, I don't really know but it's irrelevant to the discussion of which candidate is better.

but you're still stupid

I don't want to hear your sugar coated messages as you can't even make attempts to succeed at anything you do.

[Socks]

but you're still stupid

Says Lawlz who always results to such excellent comebacks when someone challenges his point. Grow up dude, there's a reason the voting age is 18.

[Pele]

Ron Paul (THE BEST! THE BEST! THE BEST! THE BEST!)

[ncba93ivyase]

Says Lawlz who always results to such excellent comebacks when someone challenges his point. Grow up dude, there's a reason the voting age is 18.

Yet the one that gets high, can't think for shit, has sex with every $2 whore, and thinks his dumb ass is something is voting for the conservative--the one that doesn't work in his interests at all aside from SHOOTAN and KILLAN.

also, arguments, such as yours, mean nothing if they're all just heaps of bullshit that string together dozens of words to look like they mean something. a couple of lines is just as effective

[Title27GT]

Says Lawlz who always results to such excellent comebacks when someone challenges his point. Grow up dude, there's a reason the voting age is 18.

a) I can't even begin to explain how much smarter Lawlz is than you
b) It's "resort"

[Socks]

Yet the one that gets high, can't think for shit, has sex with every $2 whore, and thinks his dumb ass is something is voting for the conservative

So you think by throwing around false opinionated "factoids" and attacks against me that that is somehow going to validate your choice? It's really telling when someone choses to try and discredit someone else rather then back up their own assertions.

--the one that doesn't work in his interests at all aside from SHOOTAN and KILLAN.

What has Obama or Hillary done for you? They're just as rich as corrupt as McCain is, to believe anything else it to fall prey to petty politics.

also, arguments, such as yours, mean nothing if they're all just heaps of bullshit that string together dozens of words to look like they mean something. a couple of lines is just as effective

And arguments like yours which do not even attempt to address a point but just throw insults around are indeed something to revere.

[ncba93ivyase]

So you think by throwing around false opinionated "factoids" and attacks against me that that is somehow going to validate your choice? It's really telling when someone choses to try and discredit someone else rather then back up their own assertions.

What has Obama or Hillary done for you? They're just as rich as corrupt as McCain is, to believe anything else it to fall prey to petty politics.

And arguments like yours which do not even attempt to address a point but just throw insults around are indeed something to revere.

There are no facts to back up anything you just said there.

[Socks]

a) I can't even begin to explain how much smarter Lawlz is than you

You shouldn't since it would be pointless.