WIDEN THE FORUM'S BODY BY 100 PIXELS?

[Samus Aran]

Um...no, because some of us are using rotating banners here.

We're not all Lawlz.

[guff]

I don't even use the rotating banners because they just cause unnecessary loading.

god forbid a page has one image adding typically less than 50KB of data

which brings up another point: why are you retarded when it comes to file size 

[ncba93ivyase]

god forbid a page has one image adding typically less than 50KB of data

which brings up another point: why are you retarded when it comes to file size 

There's also the possibility a nice solid color is preferred over CHIPZ.

[Feynman]

I've already experienced it and it feels nasty.

[Samus Aran]

There's also the possibility a nice solid color is preferred over CHIPZ.

there's also the possibility that not everyone agrees with you

[Hiro]

There's also the possibility a nice solid color is preferred over CHIPZ.

Sounds good, how do we get rid of them?

[Feynman]

Sounds good, how do we get rid of them?

AdBlock.

[ncba93ivyase]

Sounds good, how do we get rid of them?

Change your theme to DIX.

Or how about DIX just has a width of 100 extra pixels? weewee;

[Hiro]

AdBlock.

bah I don't wanna. Anyways, I have that, and......i see no option.

[Samus Aran]

Or how about DIX just has a width of 100 extra pixels? weewee;

Sure. Any theme that doesn't use rotating banners would work fine with a larger width.

[guff]

There's also the possibility a nice solid color is preferred over CHIPZ.

hey aren't you the admin who's in charge of graphics or something

Regardless, you were originally only arguing against it based on file size.  Never mind the fact that almost every single signature here adds more data to a page than the banner does.  Hell, even your signature's file size is larger than some of the banners.

[ncba93ivyase]

hey aren't you the admin who's in charge of graphics or something

Regardless, you were originally only arguing against it based on file size.  Never mind the fact that almost every single signature here adds more data to a page than the banner does.  Hell, even your signature's file size is larger than some of the banners.

The file size of each banner was once about 250 kilobytes or more. After I reduced their sizes, they're all around 50 or so.

Sigs get cached, but a rotating banner doesn't.

...

[guff]

The file size of each banner was once about 250 kilobytes or more. After I reduced their sizes, they're all around 50 or so.

this would be a lot more effective if it was relevant
speaking of which, how was it supposed to be

Sigs get cached, but a rotating banner doesn't.

OH NO 50KB

maybe you should get a browser that doesn't suck

[ncba93ivyase]

this would be a lot more effective if it was relevant

i somehow read it as if you were saying i used that as an argument against them a long time ago

OH NO 50KB

Maybe we should have some banners that don't suck.

I hate making something that wide.

[guff]

i somehow read it as if you were saying i used that as an argument against them a long time ago

yes because that makes sense

Maybe we should have some banners that don't suck.

hey aren't you the admin in charge of graphics or something

I hate making something that wide.