do you smoke?

[ncba93ivyase]

"taking measures to protect those of us able to think"

Wow.

Not permitting smoking in restaurants in many jurisdictions does protect wise citizens. Applying a tobacco tax does too.

I'm pretty sure I would know if she was having cancer.

Ask her to run for a mile and see how long it takes for her to collapse.

PROTIP: You can count the seconds on one hand.

[hotlikesauce.]

Not permitting smoking in restaurants in many jurisdictions does protect wise citizens. Applying a tobacco tax does too.Ask her to run for a mile and see how long it takes for her to collapse.

PROTIP: You can count the seconds on one hand.

"Not permitting" smoking isnt going to stop one. You can ban smoking, but that would only want to make people try it more. People want what they cant have.

Applying a tobacco tax is just so the government can jew more money out of America. Again, people want what they cant have. Applying a one dollar tax per pack will say "I wonder what all the fuss is about". *Tries cigarette. Gets addicted. Gives more money to the government*.

If smoking is SO bad and causes SO many diseases, why not ban it?

[Nyerp]

because it doesn't actually give you diseases cancer is a sign of perfect health

[hotlikesauce.]

because it doesn't actually give you diseases cancer is a sign of perfect health

You need out of this conversation.

They try to put it like smoking is the sole cause of cancer. In reality, it isn't. Hell, I could get lung cancer or something tomorrow. There's always the possbility. If we're all gonna die, how are they going to say that it isn't good enough for me..?

[Nyerp]

You need out of this conversation.

They try to put it like smoking is the sole cause of cancer. In reality, it isn't. Hell, I could get lung cancer or something tomorrow. There's always the possbility. If we're all gonna die, how are they going to say that it isn't good enough for me..?

cancer doesn't just happen randomly dumbass

you can even take precautions and try to prevent breast cancer and stuff

[hotlikesauce.]

cancer doesn't just happen randomly dumbass

you can even take precautions and try to prevent breast cancer and stuff

Here, let me massage my breasts.

[Selkie]

"Not permitting" smoking isnt going to stop one. You can ban smoking, but that would only want to make people try it more. People want what they cant have.

Applying a tobacco tax is just so the government can jew more money out of America. Again, people want what they cant have. Applying a one dollar tax per pack will say "I wonder what all the fuss is about". *Tries cigarette. Gets addicted. Gives more money to the government*.

If smoking is SO bad and causes SO many diseases, why not ban it?

Probably for the same reason they don't develop cancer cures, for the money.

[Selkie]

cancer doesn't just happen randomly dumbass

you can even take precautions and try to prevent breast cancer and stuff

Actually, it can just happen randomly.

Either that, or there are so many things tht cause it that it is impossible to totally prevent it.

[Nyerp]

Here, let me massage my breasts.

go ahead

[Nyerp]

Actually, it can just happen randomly.

Either that, or there are so many things tht cause it that it is impossible to totally prevent it.

well, i guess, but i don't think LUNG cancer comes out of nowhere

[hotlikesauce.]

well, i guess, but i don't think LUNG cancer comes out of nowhere

Meh. I guess I was wrong about LUNG cancer, but yeah.

Take Andrew McMahon for example.

[Nyerp]

Meh. I guess I was wrong about LUNG cancer, but yeah.

Take Andrew McMahon for example.

who's that

[hotlikesauce.]

who's that

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McMahon

I'm sorry, he got lukemia.

[ncba93ivyase]

"Not permitting" smoking isnt going to stop one. You can ban smoking, but that would only want to make people try it more. People want what they cant have.

Applying a tobacco tax is just so the government can jew more money out of America. Again, people want what they cant have. Applying a one dollar tax per pack will say "I wonder what all the fuss is about". *Tries cigarette. Gets addicted. Gives more money to the government*.

If smoking is SO bad and causes SO many diseases, why not ban it?

a poor man that spends hundreds of dollars a month to feed an addiction is going to take a heavy hit when he pays double that due to a government tax and more than likely is going to end up smoking less or end up going into debt

also there are plenty of people in america addicted to marijuana but even more are addicted to tobacco. guess which one is illegal. the legal one is easier to access so all the little kiddies go for it first. if they somehow derive pleasure from that, a few go up to illegal drugs like marijuana which cost more and are harder to obtain but are more pleasureful.

a tax repels others from trying it because they see it as a pain in the ass. most people don't do cocaine and it's not really a coincidence that it's pretty damn expensive. i'm sure if it was as cheap as tobacco there would be plenty more coke addicts.

high price doesn't always equate to high demand

Also, your mother hates you.

[Nyerp]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_McMahon

I'm sorry, he got lukemia.

yeah but mainly it's chemicals, drugs, and radiation that cause cancer

you homophobe