December 21, 2024, 10:36:20 PM

1,531,361 Posts in 46,734 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


Announcing targeted message icons.

Started by Daddy, December 27, 2007, 07:57:15 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 04:59:58 PM


And hurry up and add the flash one.
what the hell is that background?  better one plz. 

and okay adding flash

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 05:07:24 PM
what the hell is that background?  better one plz. 

and okay adding flash
no because the idea of adding one for plain sheets of paper is stupid

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 05:16:22 PM
no because the idea of adding one for plain sheets of paper is stupid
Are you retarded?


The "standard" message icon sucks, and it doesn't fit in with the others.   I want to replace with something that would fit in with all of the other ones you made.  Right now it's not even the same size as the others. 

guff

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 05:21:54 PM
Are you retarded?


The "standard" message icon sucks, and it doesn't fit in with the others.   I want to replace with something that would fit in with all of the other ones you made.  Right now it's not even the same size as the others. 
so what about and

Daddy

Quote from: Commodore Guff on December 28, 2007, 05:22:52 PM
so what about and
we'll do those too but i first need to explain to lawlz why we need the standard one to fit in.

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 05:23:30 PM
we'll do those too but i first need to explain to lawlz why we need the standard one to fit in.
or we just keep them the way they are because they'd look stupid otherwise

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 05:30:45 PM
or we just keep them the way they are because they'd look stupid otherwise
They look stupid now when they don't fit it.  befuddlement


I'll just use FMG's since you just don't want to actually put effort into it.

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 05:31:28 PM
They look stupid now when they don't fit it.  befuddlement


I'll just use FMG's since you just don't want to actually put effort into it.
Adding a background to a plain thumb or something is even stupider. psyduck;

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 05:32:36 PM
Adding a background to a plain thumb or something is even stupider. psyduck;
stupider?  more stupid.

then do something else then for the thumbs. i know you hate actually doing any work that requires more effort than cutting and pasting images.

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 05:42:13 PM
stupider?  more stupid.

then do something else then for the thumbs. i know you hate actually doing any work that requires more effort than cutting and pasting images.
or just leave them the way they are because a sheet of paper and some thumbs really don't go well with much in a small area without looking like slop

and stupider is a word

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 05:45:35 PM
or just leave them the way they are because a sheet of paper and some thumbs really don't go well with much in a small area without looking like slop
the sheets of paper are the same height. psyduck;  It is just making it so it conforms with the others and looks good.  if you want something other than a sheet of paper go make it and stop bitching, we just need a new standard.

Quoteand stupider is a word
So is "ain't" but you still sound like a fucking redneck if you say it.

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 05:48:19 PM
So is "ain't" but you still sound like a fucking redneck if you say it.
so is smaller "redneck" or would it be "less large"

psyduck;

Now you're just being an idiot.

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 07:56:13 PM
so is smaller "redneck" or would it be "less large"

psyduck;

Now you're just being an idiot.
smaller is grammatically correct.  More small isn't.

More stupid is grammatically correct.  Stupider isn't.


You're being an idiot.

ncba93ivyase

Quote from: JMV290 on December 28, 2007, 08:02:15 PM
smaller is grammatically correct.  More small isn't.

More stupid is grammatically correct.  Stupider isn't.


You're being an idiot.
stupider stupidest alkjsfgsdukg are grammatically correct

guess what

so are more stupid and most stupid

psyduck;

The point still stands: you're an idiot.

http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/grammar/adjektive_steig.htm

Quote from: ncba93ivyase on June 18, 2014, 07:58:34 PMthis isa great post i will use it in my sig

Daddy

Quote from: Lawlz on December 28, 2007, 08:10:14 PM
stupider stupidest alkjsfgsdukg are grammatically correct

guess what

so are more stupid and most stupid

psyduck;

The point still stands: you're an idiot.

http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/grammar/adjektive_steig.htm
You still sound like a red neck.   Anyone will tell you that "stupider" is completely idiotic.  If you tried pulling that off on a college paper you would lose points.  Just because Americans have raped our language beyond any logical comprehension doesn't mean that a word is suddenly grammatically correct.


I bet a German site is the foremost source on the English language.


The point still stands: You talk like a redneck, and you can't debate. i.e. You're an idiot.

Go Up