lol Jayhawk thinks Windows Media Player is better than iTunes

[Daddy]

Here are his reasons

• Windows Media Player can encode music at more than 128KBPS(which iTunes can too, when I showed him a screenshot he was like "uhm well iTunes can only do 320, WMP can do CD Quality) Why the fuck would you need more than 320 KBPS for a song?   The quality doesn't sound much better...


• When he imports music from a CD into iTunes his computer makes noise.... OH SHIT REALLY? YOU'RE READING OFF YOUR CD DRIVE AND WRITING TO YOUR HARDDRIVE AT THE SAME TIME AND YOUR COMPUTER IS MAKING NOISE?


• He claims that iTunes hogs his RAM, even though the system requirements for Windows Media Player are twice that of iTunes

lol

[Samus Aran]

Ask him how he sorts his music. caterpie;

[Daddy]

Ask him how he sorts his music. caterpie;

Oh shit. Windows Media Player has a shitty organization system.  iTunes stores everything in an XML file, so it loads instantly.

Windows Media Player needs to manually scan for everything, which takes a long time and can crash when trying to keep track of libraries that are well over 1000 songs.

[Daddy]

lol, the Wikipedia article on "Kilobit per second" says 192 KBPS is near CD Quality.  caterpie;

320 kbps is pretty good then. navi;

[Blaze-Senpai]

I like Windows Media Player better than iTunes simply because it looks better.

Other than that, I don't give a fuck, I only have about 250 songs anyway, of that, I only listen to about 20 at most on any given day, yay Repeat One.

[Daddy]

I like Windows Media Player better than iTunes simply because it looks better.

Other than that, I don't give a fuck, I only have about 250 songs anyway, of that, I only listen to about 20 at most on any given day, yay Repeat One.

Uhm, I find WMP to be bulky and unattractive.   Skinning doesn't count because you could use the same logic for iTunes because it can be skinned too http://guistyles.com/category/itunes-skins/

Also, most people don't spend all day looking at their media player.  I have my browser window covering it, so I could give a shit what it looks like.

[JGE]

Oh my god, JMV has become a .

[Blaze-Senpai]

Uhm, I find WMP to be bulky and unattractive.   Skinning doesn't count because you could use the same logic for iTunes because it can be skinned too http://guistyles.com/category/itunes-skins/

Also, most people don't spend all day looking at their media player.  I have my browser window covering it, so I could give a shit what it looks like.

Green>Grey In the taskbar personally, but yeah, I never have mines open long enough to notice it. I don't care about Organization because I can just Search the library for a song anyway.

[Hiro]

Borth are orkay. iTurnes hars ther coverflow arnd  Windowrs Merdia Player irs pretty arnd sturf.

[Placebo Headwound]

I honestly don't give a crap which one I use.

Though I've been using iTunes a lot since that's what the iPod uses.

[Samus Aran]

Oh my god, JMV has become a .

How so? He's right. iTunes just does everything better (except for burning CDs).

[Daddy]

Borth are orkay. iTurnes hars ther coverflow arnd  Windowrs Merdia Player irs pretty arnd sturf.

rrrrr im a pirate

[ncba93ivyase]

i actually think wmp supports more formats than itunes but whatever

VLC is still the king of all media players.

[YPrrrr]

lol, the Wikipedia article on "Kilobit per second" says 192 KBPS is near CD Quality.  caterpie;

320 kbps is pretty good then. navi;

Thank god we can always rely on wiki


[spoiler]yes that was sarcasm[/spoiler]

[Daddy]

i actually think wmp supports more formats than itunes but whatever

VLC is still the king of all media players.

BUt how many PMPs support all of those formats?