lol and sort of lol

[Samus Aran]

conducted in most every developed nation, id assume

...why?

[ncba93ivyase]

...why?

HOW WOULD A MIDDLE AGED WOMAN FEEL IF THIS SHAMPOO GETS IN HER EYES AND SHE HAS NO ACCESS TO RUNNING WATER FOR 48 HOURS?

[Kalahari Inkantation]

...why?

So that asshole "biologists" can watch and laugh. :'(

[Samus Aran]

HOW WOULD A MIDDLE AGED WOMAN FEEL IF THIS SHAMPOO GETS IN HER EYES AND SHE HAS NO ACCESS TO RUNNING WATER FOR 48 HOURS?

Yes, because we need to know that.

We already know that shampoo is harmful for our eyes. That should be enough.

I think some scientists just run out of things to study when they decide tests like that are necessary.

[ncba93ivyase]

Yes, because we need to know that.

We already know that shampoo is harmful for our eyes. That should be enough.

I think some scientists just run out of things to study when they decide tests like that are necessary.

And that it has to be tested on tens of thousands of animals every year for each nations, totaling to millions. JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH.

[Samus Aran]

And that it has to be tested on tens of thousands of animals every year for each nations, totaling to millions. JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH.

They should take up an extra hobby to get rid of their boredom. y;

[Kalahari Inkantation]

If scientists spent their money on researching AIDS rather than tormenting animals...

[ncba93ivyase]

They should take up an extra hobby to get rid of their boredom. y;

fap;

Because we all know no "scientist" gets laid.

If scientists spent their money on researching AIDS rather than tormenting animals...

I'd rather they go for how to wipe out people with AIDS instead of wasting time trying to cure it.

Or at least aim for something curable that no one ever seems to think about, like cervical and testicular cancer. Who really cares about breast cancer?

[Kalahari Inkantation]

fap;

Because we all know no "scientist" gets laid. powerofone;I'd rather they go for how to wipe out people with AIDS instead of wasting time trying to cure it.

Or at least aim for something curable that no one ever seems to think about, like cervical and testicular cancer. Who really cares about breast cancer?

Yeah, cancer would be a good thing to research too. But reseraching any deadly disease is better than torturing animals.

[ncba93ivyase]

Yeah, cancer would be a good thing to research too. But reseraching any deadly disease is better than torturing animals.

Guess what they do the research on? caterpie;

I say we move onto some of those useless homeless folks and Africans.

[Kalahari Inkantation]

Guess what they do the research on? caterpie;

I say we move onto some of those useless homeless folks and Africans.

Yeah, but if the reserach is for a good cause, and they're treating the animals ina  humane way, then it's...not OK, but necessary. Throwing soap in a rabbit's eyes, however, is just plain stupid. :'(

[ncba93ivyase]

Yeah, but if the reserach is for a good cause, and they're treating the animals ina  humane way, then it's...not OK, but necessary. Throwing soap in a rabbit's eyes, however, is just plain stupid. :'(

LET'S GIVE THESE 50 ENDANGERED APES AIDS, KNOWING WE CAN'T POSSIBLY CURE THEM.

[Kalahari Inkantation]

LET'S GIVE THESE 50 ENDANGERED APES AIDS, KNOWING WE CAN'T POSSIBLY CURE THEM.

no thats just stupid
First, only humans can get AIDS. Second, couldn''t they just put the AIDS virus into a test tube of some sort and see what kills it that wouldn't kill the person with it? Later on, after testing it enough, they could give it to a real person who already has AIDS.

[ncba93ivyase]

no thats just stupid
First, only humans can get AIDS.

lol wut

[Kalahari Inkantation]

lol wut

It's true.
Find a reliable source that says otherwise and I'll believe that other animals can get it too. Either way, it has nothing to do with my point.