[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=e9eBFKXkKk4[/youtube]
why her eyes so big
Quote from: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo on September 05, 2018, 07:32:53 AMwhy her eyes so big
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wd4ymw/can-you-tell-what-drugs-someones-on-just-by-looking-at-their-eyes-876
The female Roger Ebert decided to take all of them at once.
(https://i.imgur.com/uKKqJ3n.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiNFXcI9Rb8)
why is female roger ebert high on ketamine
Shouldnt the female roger ebert be dead
More line female leonard maltin
i dont think she blinked
god this lady has the same eyes as Zuckerberg what the fuck does silicon valley do to you?
Quote from: YPrrrr on September 05, 2018, 07:52:36 AMShouldnt the female roger ebert be dead
in an ideal world
Quote from: YPrrrr on September 05, 2018, 07:52:36 AMMore line female leonard maltin
Quote from: Magyarorszag on September 05, 2018, 07:41:11 AM(https://i.imgur.com/uKKqJ3n.jpg) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiNFXcI9Rb8)
(https://i.imgur.com/Gqm5fOc.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/4M2KNEO.png)
Oh i see now
damn thats fucked up
make it stop
(https://i.imgur.com/YHCG5QX.jpg)
has she hit rock bottom yet or do i have to wait a few more months before i got a shot wit hthis broad
Quote from: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo on September 05, 2018, 09:30:58 AMhas she hit rock bottom yet or do i have to wait a few more months before i got a shot wit hthis broad
(https://i.imgur.com/Rqur5tE.jpg)
I can't even focus on what she's saying and I'm very uncomfortable
i thought this thread was going to be tec claiming to be the female roger ebert
Quote from: Nyerp on September 05, 2018, 12:08:02 PMi though this thread was going to be tec claiming to be the female roger ebert
(https://i.imgur.com/eyyWgZT.jpg)
i have no interest in being the female roger ebert
Quote from: Detective Spatchcock on September 05, 2018, 11:54:59 AMI can't even focus on what she's saying and I'm very uncomfortable
she's mostly talking complete nonsense in an extremely obvious, distractingly bad vocal fry register
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocal_fry_register#Social_implicationsSome researchers have argued that vocal fry is a register in American English used by females to give their voice more credibility. Others argue that the result is that they sound less confident, undermining the effectiveness of their communication.[3][4][5] Time reports that it hampers job interviews.[6] Others argue that these perceptions are part of a broader attack on women's speech.[7]
with a crazed look in her eyes that's supposed to convey enthusiasm and confidence
both of which she was trained to do by some nutter of a mentor in the interest of, as the wikipedia article suggests, superficially boosting her credibility and securing venture capital from absolute sucker morons without question
instead, these freaky and artificial mannerisms just make her look like the extremely creepy sociopath she is
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8qgmGtRMsY[/youtube]
count the number of head nods, count the times she breaks that disturbing grin, count the times she blinks or breaks eye contact, etc.
note the blatant aping of steve jobs with the stupid all black turtlenecks, lol
and specifically count the number of times she repeats that completely meaningless mantra along the lines of 'we believe in an individual's right to access their own data' (what does that even mean ??!?) while saying almost nothing of worth in that 15 minutes of utter technobabble
the female roger ebert exists at the very depths of the uncanny valley
it's as if she was laboratory manufactured, probably by the very same frauds and hacks who worked at her """company""", to exploit human sociology and psychology in order to maximally swindle naive idiot """investors""" out of billions
And it worked.
Yeah that voice is also pretty strange didn't even notice it until you pointed it out because of everything else.
The voice feels not genuine like you say.
Quote from: reeper on September 05, 2018, 08:02:13 PMYeah that voice is also pretty strange didnââ,¬â,,¢t even notice it until you pointed it out because of everything else.
The voice feels not genuine like you say.
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocal_fry_register#Social_implicationsA 2014 national study of American adults found that speech with vocal fry was perceived more negatively than a voice without vocal fry, particularly in a labor market context.[19] In young adult women, it was perceived as sounding less trustworthy, less competent, less attractive, and less hirable.[19] The negative evaluation was stronger when the evaluator was also a woman.[20]
The national study of 800 listeners across age groups found that people making hiring decisions preferred a voice without vocal fry to one with vocal fry.[19] A limitation of the study was that the vocal fry samples were produced by imitators rather than natural vocal fry speakers. That suggests that more research is needed, as the negative reaction could be attributable to other factors.[19][21]
given this and all the other weirdness, how did anyone manage to fall for
such an obvious charade
she's like a badly programmed robot built to separate fools from their money, and yet as miserably poor and artificial as her programming is, she still managed to do exactly what she set out to and con some truly braindead """investors""" out of $9 billion
(https://i.imgur.com/ZqiTuR9.jpg)
how horrifying
elizabeth holmes can test my blood with them bugass eyes dittodood;
Quote from: Magyarorszag on September 05, 2018, 08:15:53 PMQuote from: reeper on September 05, 2018, 08:02:13 PMYeah that voice is also pretty strange didnââ,¬â,,¢t even notice it until you pointed it out because of everything else.
The voice feels not genuine like you say.
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocal_fry_register#Social_implicationsA 2014 national study of American adults found that speech with vocal fry was perceived more negatively than a voice without vocal fry, particularly in a labor market context.[19] In young adult women, it was perceived as sounding less trustworthy, less competent, less attractive, and less hirable.[19] The negative evaluation was stronger when the evaluator was also a woman.[20]
The national study of 800 listeners across age groups found that people making hiring decisions preferred a voice without vocal fry to one with vocal fry.[19] A limitation of the study was that the vocal fry samples were produced by imitators rather than natural vocal fry speakers. That suggests that more research is needed, as the negative reaction could be attributable to other factors.[19][21]
given this and all the other weirdness, how did anyone manage to fall for such an obvious charade
she's like a badly programmed robot built to separate fools from their money, and yet as miserably poor and artificial as her programming is, she still managed to do exactly what she set out to and con some truly braindead """investors""" out of $9 billion
(https://i.imgur.com/ZqiTuR9.jpg)
how horrifying
America is in love with fakeness, aren't you paying attention
She looks like the inverse of Renee Zellweger (pre-surgery). Like if you took their two faces and combined them you'd get one normal human woman face.
(https://i.imgur.com/sMOgvu6.png)
she honestly looks completely synthetic
look at how loosely that skinsuit fits
the unusually thick rubber mask, ever stuck in that uncanny expression, slightly sloughing off the underlying facial hardware
the disproportionately sized head
and it looks like they might have made her neck a little too long
Quote from: Magyarorszag on September 07, 2018, 10:22:26 AM(https://i.imgur.com/sMOgvu6.png)
i couldn't quite place my finger on why this image looks so familiar until just now
(https://i.imgur.com/6FF8tCF.gif)
oh my god
i just realized she's very deliberately invoking marie curie in this press shot:
(https://i.imgur.com/eV1VxbO.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/ptUPraF.png)
as if the obvious aping of steve jobs wasn't bad enough
jesus christ what a completely irredeemable piece of unapologetic shit the female roger ebert is
Why do her pictures make me laugh
ii'm gonna write to her in prison lubdoods;
Quote from: C.Mongler on September 08, 2018, 08:20:17 AMii'm gonna write to her in prison lubdoods;
honestly she probably won't see so much as a single day in prison
And that's a bad thing. smithicide;
she deserves nothing more than to spend the rest of her days rusting away in a concrete box
but if you want her attn probably all you have to do is feign interest in her inevitable next big scheme lol
That's how she met her most recent """boyfriend""". I'm not even kidding. srsly
(https://i.imgur.com/E7ISWdI.jpg)
LOL
i GUARANTEE this isn't the last we've seen or heard of this freak, she'll be back with another obvious scam in 5 or 10 years
(https://i.imgur.com/FjdYIqB.jpg?1)
these sociopaths never ever go away for good
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramesh_BalwaniWhile enrolled at Berkeley, Balwani [most recent BF] met Elizabeth Holmes, who was in her senior year of high school. The two were on a summer trip to Beijing, as a part of Stanford's Summer Mandarin Course cohort.[5] Holmes then went on to Stanford University to pursue an undergraduate degree in chemical engineering [5], but later dropped out to focus full-time on Theranos.[6][7]
Gee, that's not suspicious at all. goodjob;
surprise surprise she's always been an expensive prostitute lol
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramesh_BalwaniBalwani at one point claimed: "This invention [the Edison blood testing device] is going to be way up there, um, with-- with the discovery of antibiotics."[8] Within Theranos, Balwani was known for using technical terms he seemingly did not understand in what others believed were attempts to appear more knowledgeable. He once misheard "end effector" (the claw or other device at the end of an automated robot's arm) as "endofactor" (a nonsense word) and repeated the error throughout a meeting, furthermore not noticing when "Endofactor" was subsequently used as a prank in a PowerPoint presentation.[5]
i lol'd
tfw if the female roger ebert hadn't been surrounded by wealth from birth, she's be just another generic nameless instagramme thot quietly selling herself to rich saudis while fronting as some sort of mysteriously successful businesswoman
dang her boo aint even cute he's probably got a microdong too
Quote from: C.Mongler on September 08, 2018, 10:34:55 AMdang her boo aint even cute he's probably got a microdong too
I hear she's single and quite lonely these days. Now's your chance. dittodood;
But make sure you have a large enough seed fund. srsly
i have my 60 dollars in amd earnings
and with that you're doing better than every single one of her investors L O L
boyahbby ayyyyyyyyyyyyyYYYoooOOOooOoOoooooooooo boyahbby
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/elizabeth-holmes-sentencing-theranos-trial
>11 years in federal prison
(https://i.imgur.com/Rj3uhxg.jpg)
Beautiful. :')
although i'm a little disgusted that it's
only because she defrauded filthy rich privileged moron """investors"""
quite frankly, those idiots deserve what they got for pumping billions into an obvious fraudster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Holmes
QuoteHer trial in the case of U.S. v. Holmes, et al. ended in January 2022 when Holmes was convicted of defrauding investors, and acquitted of defrauding patients.
But no justice for the countless patients whose lives she toyed with. That's simply tragic. SocksDood;
Jennifer Shah will keep her company after she's sentenced at least
i can fix her
the dropout was p. good you guys should watch it if you haven't
Quote from: Majorana's Incantation on November 19, 2022, 11:34:45 AMhttps://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/elizabeth-holmes-sentencing-theranos-trial
>11 years in federal prison
(https://i.imgur.com/Rj3uhxg.jpg)
Beautiful. :')
owned
saddood;