Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: ncba93ivyase on November 16, 2007, 08:16:02 PM

Title: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: ncba93ivyase on November 16, 2007, 08:16:02 PM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Blowtorching_goggles_and_helmet.jpg)

oh god why did i laugh at this :'(
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 16, 2007, 08:17:05 PM
... psyduck;
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: iWolf on November 16, 2007, 08:17:49 PM
Quote from: NINTENDUDE312 on November 16, 2007, 08:17:05 PM
... psyduck;

..badass
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Samus Aran on November 16, 2007, 08:31:39 PM
Good question. I didn't even smile.
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Kingoftherings on November 16, 2007, 09:51:27 PM
What are they trying to sell me?   psyduck;
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: GingaNinja on November 16, 2007, 11:12:34 PM
My brother owns a pair. badass
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Pyrate on November 17, 2007, 03:24:28 PM
huh
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: mariofreak on November 17, 2007, 03:25:42 PM
Quote from: Speedykaz on November 16, 2007, 08:31:39 PM
Good question. I didn't even smile.
same, and i normally crack up at these sort of things
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Selkie on November 17, 2007, 05:30:56 PM
This type of goggles is

THIS type of goggles IS
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Samus Aran on November 17, 2007, 05:41:38 PM
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 17, 2007, 05:30:56 PM
This type of goggles is

THIS type of goggles IS


gb2/elementary school/

"type" is the subject, not goggles, you dumbass.

THIS TYPE

DOES "THESE TYPE" MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU?
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: ncba93ivyase on November 17, 2007, 05:58:48 PM
Quote from: Speedykaz on November 17, 2007, 05:41:38 PM
gb2/elementary school/

"type" is the subject, not goggles, you dumbass.

THIS TYPE

DOES "THESE TYPE" MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU?
also goggles is singular and you can't have a goggle unless you're using it as a verb caterpie;
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Selkie on November 17, 2007, 06:07:42 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on November 17, 2007, 05:58:48 PM
also goggles is singular and you can't have a goggle unless you're using it as a verb caterpie;


oh, so "a goggles" , or "a pants" sounds correct to you?
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 17, 2007, 06:08:42 PM
youre both wrong but youre both right
it should be "this pair of goggles..."
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: ncba93ivyase on November 17, 2007, 06:12:35 PM
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 17, 2007, 06:07:42 PM
oh, so "a goggles" , or "a pants" sounds correct to you?
No, just "goggles."

It's still singular.
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Samus Aran on November 17, 2007, 06:28:09 PM
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 17, 2007, 06:07:42 PM
oh, so "a goggles" , or "a pants" sounds correct to you?


The descriptive noun is necessary, thus why "type of goggles" or "pair of goggles" is both correct and singular.

Quote from: Lawlz on November 17, 2007, 06:12:35 PM
No, just "goggles."

It's still singular.


For some reason, no. I don't know why it doesn't work that way. Go kill someone for making "these goggles" correct-er.
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:32:29 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on November 17, 2007, 06:12:35 PM
No, just "goggles."

It's still singular.
(http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/4294/gogglesjs1.png)

(http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/2852/goggles2as3.png)
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: ncba93ivyase on November 17, 2007, 06:33:08 PM
Quote from: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:32:29 PM
(http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/4294/gogglesjs1.png)
meaty cock
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Selkie on November 17, 2007, 06:34:06 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on November 17, 2007, 06:33:08 PM
meaty cock


fail;d
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:34:17 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on November 17, 2007, 06:33:08 PM
meaty cock
what?

Also, Microsoft Word says that "These goggles don?t fit." is perfectly correct burned;
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 17, 2007, 06:35:12 PM
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 17, 2007, 06:34:06 PM
fail;d
lmao
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: ncba93ivyase on November 17, 2007, 06:35:17 PM
Quote from: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:34:17 PM
what?
meaty cocks
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:36:42 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on November 17, 2007, 06:35:17 PM
meaty cocks
Is that a gasp or... something else >_>
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 17, 2007, 06:38:19 PM
Quote from: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:36:42 PM
Is that a gasp or... something else >_>

<_<
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:39:54 PM
Quote from: NINTENDUDE312 on November 17, 2007, 06:38:19 PM
<_<
▲_▲
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 17, 2007, 06:40:26 PM
Quote from: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:39:54 PM
▲_▲

v_v
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: bluaki on November 17, 2007, 06:41:29 PM
Quote from: NINTENDUDE312 on November 17, 2007, 06:40:26 PM
v_v
▼_▼
►_►
◄_◄
►_◄
◄_►
▲_▲

On a side note, does this look like crying?:
♀_♀
Title: Re: This type of goggles is NOT adequate
Post by: Samus Aran on November 17, 2007, 06:44:52 PM
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 17, 2007, 06:34:06 PM
fail;d


hahaha oh wow