Boyah Forums

General => Philosophy & Scholarly Debate => Topic started by: on December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM

Poll
Question: daaaaaaaaa
Option 1: Obama votes: 41
Option 2: McCain votes: 6
Option 3: Nader votes: 6
Option 4: token Libertarian candidate votes: 4
Title: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 08, 2008, 10:27:21 PM
Since the primaries are pretty much over.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Geno on June 08, 2008, 10:27:50 PM
Obama
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on June 09, 2008, 06:50:32 AM
I'm pulling for Obama.

On a side note, I thought it was really cute too see him and his wife bang knuckles on TV.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: wolflink64 on June 09, 2008, 04:42:23 PM
lol Nader.

Oh, and unanimous Obama vote makes this place infinitely better than NS2.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Ezloﺕ on June 09, 2008, 04:49:51 PM
Quote from: wolflink64 on June 09, 2008, 04:42:23 PM
lol Nader.

Oh, and unanimous Obama vote makes this place infinitely better than NS2.
Wait until Tyler ruins it.  :/
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Walter on June 09, 2008, 06:42:47 PM
NAAAAADAR hahah... wait. I wanna change my vote now. >_>
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 09, 2008, 08:32:24 PM
Quote from: Zyphet on June 09, 2008, 06:42:47 PM
NAAAAADAR hahah... wait. I wanna change my vote now. >_>
That's what you get for not taking Serious Discussion Seriously.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: wolflink64 on June 09, 2008, 09:59:54 PM
Quote from: houdini on June 09, 2008, 08:32:24 PM
That's what you get for not taking Serious Discussion Seriously.
Thanks for the lols. keke;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: sans culottes on June 09, 2008, 10:07:34 PM
Add Barr.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 10, 2008, 10:06:24 AM
Quote from: Co-Z on June 09, 2008, 10:07:34 PM
Add Barr.
Why bother?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: sans culottes on June 10, 2008, 10:34:56 AM
Quote from: houdini on June 10, 2008, 10:06:24 AM
Why bother?

because what if someone wants to pick bob barr
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 10, 2008, 10:59:33 AM
Quote from: Co-Z on June 10, 2008, 10:34:56 AM
because what if someone wants to pick bob barr
You're assuming someone would want to pick Bob Barr.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: sans culottes on June 10, 2008, 02:40:03 PM
Quote from: houdini on June 10, 2008, 10:59:33 AM
You're assuming someone would want to pick Bob Barr.

Well I'm tied with him and Obama so what if I pick him.  baddood;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 10, 2008, 03:06:30 PM
Quote from: Co-Z on June 10, 2008, 02:40:03 PM
Well I'm tied with him and Obama so what if I pick him.  baddood;
You're probably the only one who even knows who he is.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: sans culottes on June 10, 2008, 03:08:44 PM
Quote from: houdini on June 10, 2008, 03:06:30 PM
You're probably the only one who even knows who he is.

but i saw him on the colbert report recently so now everyone knows who he is
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on June 10, 2008, 03:38:07 PM
Quote from: houdini on June 10, 2008, 03:06:30 PM
You're probably the only one who even knows who he is.
libertarian party baddood;
Also, Obama's really the only one who matters. powerofone;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 10, 2008, 03:42:32 PM
Ok, fine. Happy?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on June 10, 2008, 03:43:25 PM
Quote from: houdini on June 10, 2008, 03:42:32 PM
Ok, fine. Happy?
Get rid of everyone but Obama and then I'll be happy. baddood;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on June 10, 2008, 05:51:48 PM
Quote from: joeinc on June 10, 2008, 05:50:42 PM
itt we delete posts that are true
ITT We delete posts that don't belong in Serious Discussion.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on June 10, 2008, 05:58:51 PM
vote mccain 08

he will teach the terrorists a lesson about messing with AMERICA
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: FAMY2 on June 10, 2008, 08:56:39 PM
I am still undecided who to vote for.  :(
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 10, 2008, 09:18:05 PM
McCain.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: FAMY2 on June 11, 2008, 08:38:21 AM
Quote from: Socks on June 10, 2008, 09:18:05 PM
McCain.



Number one reason why you vote for him.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 11, 2008, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: Clair on June 11, 2008, 08:38:21 AM
Number one reason why you vote for him.


He's 'strong' on defense and foreign policy, or at least more so then Obama.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: :atomsk: on June 11, 2008, 02:01:56 PM
McCain because he's experienced and he's more republican. obama is too young and unexperienced. His plan to 'learn as he goes' is not good enough. also he's extremely pro-abortion which i am not in favor for, and that he affiliated himself with terrorists and anti-americans. change? what change!!! ' i stand for CHANGE!' and all the dumbasses out there go - 'Oh god i love him so much! he's black and and can talk well. it doesn't REALLY matter what's coming out of his mouth because he's saying it with such intellect! OH GOD I"M A SWOONING SCHOOLGIRL!!' 
sorry.. i guess this isn't the place to rant. (!)
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 11, 2008, 04:48:03 PM
Quote from: :atomsk: on June 11, 2008, 02:01:56 PM
he affiliated himself with terrorists and anti-americans.
What?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: KonohaShinobi on June 11, 2008, 07:26:31 PM
McCain motherfucker!
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: sans culottes on June 11, 2008, 09:58:04 PM
Well thanks for adding Bob Barr, but I'm still undecided ;D

Barr has the right views but he used to be a right-winged asshole, so I'm not sure.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 11, 2008, 10:04:21 PM
Quote from: Co-Z on June 11, 2008, 09:58:04 PM
Well thanks for adding Bob Barr, but I'm still undecided ;D

Barr has the right views but he used to be a right-winged asshole, so I'm not sure.
From what I understand, he's a right-wing asshole who hates Bush for some reason.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 13, 2008, 12:48:03 AM
Quote from: houdini on June 11, 2008, 04:48:03 PM
What?


I don't know about "terrorists" but he does plan to hold formal talks with Iran etc... And then there is his former Pastor, he can be labeled "anti-american" in my opinion, it has nothing to do with birthplace.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: FAMY2 on June 13, 2008, 07:17:06 PM
Quote from: KonohaShinob-e on June 11, 2008, 07:26:31 PM
McCain motherfucker!


He is so old though.   baddood;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 13, 2008, 08:17:26 PM
Quote from: Socks on June 13, 2008, 12:48:03 AM
I don't know about "terrorists" but he does plan to hold formal talks with Iran etc...
Since when were formal talks bad?


Quote from: Socks on June 13, 2008, 12:48:03 AM
And then there is his former Pastor, he can be labeled "anti-american" in my opinion, it has nothing to do with birthplace.
That's a complete non-issue, though.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: KonohaShinobi on June 14, 2008, 06:33:14 AM
Quote from: Clair on June 13, 2008, 07:17:06 PM
He is so old though.   baddood;

Old= more experience. I don't need some newfag trying to get into office just to throw his feces all around the oval office.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Lozal on June 14, 2008, 09:34:10 AM
Obama.

At least Obama is for net neutrality and won't let the whole "tiered" Internet thing go through, as far as I heard.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on June 14, 2008, 01:32:25 PM
Quote from: KonohaShinob-e on June 14, 2008, 06:33:14 AM
Old= more experience. I don't need some newfag trying to get into office just to throw his feces all around the oval office.
I don't need some oldfag trying to get into office just to throw his feces all around the oval office.

Now this thread has at least 2 nonsensical posts
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 14, 2008, 02:13:44 PM
Quote from: KonohaShinob-e on June 14, 2008, 06:33:14 AM
Old= more experience. I don't need some newfag trying to get into office just to throw his feces all around the oval office.
Political experience doesn't seem to have much bearing on a president's competence. For example; George Bush had experience as a governor before taking the Oval Office.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 16, 2008, 09:09:39 AM
Quote from: houdini on June 13, 2008, 08:17:26 PM
Since when were formal talks bad?


The leader of the free world would  giving unimaginable credibility, recognition and satisfaction to a county diametrically opposed to us as a county and people. Not to mention they are killing our people in Iraq and the past history between our two nations.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 17, 2008, 01:01:22 AM
Quote from: Socks on June 16, 2008, 09:09:39 AM
The leader of the free world would  giving unimaginable credibility, recognition and satisfaction to a county diametrically opposed to us as a county and people. Not to mention they are killing our people in Iraq and the past history between our two nations.
So what are we supposed to do? Nuke them off the face of the earth?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on June 19, 2008, 12:22:00 AM
Quote from: houdinie on June 17, 2008, 01:01:22 AM
So what are we supposed to do? Nuke them off the face of the earth?
No.  We take the civilized route and instead arm the countries surrounding it baddood;

anyways i'm a convicted felon
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 19, 2008, 09:18:08 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on June 19, 2008, 12:22:00 AM
No.  We take the civilized route and instead arm the countries surrounding it


Yes, I love proxy.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on June 19, 2008, 09:41:52 AM
I AM VOTE FOR MCCAIN BECAUSE I IDIOT

:o
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 19, 2008, 09:43:45 AM
Quote from: Ñerp on June 19, 2008, 09:41:52 AM
I AM VOTE FOR MCCAIN BECAUSE I IDIOT


You can't vote IDIOT.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on June 19, 2008, 09:47:34 AM
Quote from: Socks on June 19, 2008, 09:43:45 AM
You can't vote IDIOT.

You're UNAMERICAN IDIOT.

:o
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on June 19, 2008, 09:10:01 PM
Quote from: Ñerp on June 19, 2008, 09:47:34 AM
You're UNAMERICAN IDIOT.

:o
Quit dipshitting this board up. If you want to argue, fine, but don't bring your chat thread bullshit in here.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on June 20, 2008, 12:10:57 AM
Quote from: Chris Tucker on June 19, 2008, 09:10:01 PM
Quit dipshitting this board up. If you want to argue, fine, but don't bring your chat thread bullshit in here.

don't bring your chat thread bullshit anywhere, dickhead
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on June 20, 2008, 01:42:30 AM
Quote from: Ñerp on June 20, 2008, 12:10:57 AM
don't bring your chat thread bullshit anywhere, dickhead
Um, I wasn't, I was going to say that if you're going to argue, do it in a respectable manner not your usual,stupid, dipshitty way. You make yourself out to be an ass.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 20, 2008, 07:58:21 PM
Quote from: Socks on June 19, 2008, 09:18:08 AM
Yes, I love proxy.
Whatever, Ronald Reagen.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 20, 2008, 08:20:33 PM
Quote from: houdinie on June 20, 2008, 07:58:21 PM
Whatever, Ronald Reagen.


Great President.  baddood;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Full Metal Ryder on June 20, 2008, 08:25:24 PM
Quote from: Socks on June 20, 2008, 08:20:33 PM
Great President.  baddood;
How so?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 20, 2008, 09:29:19 PM
Quote from: Cam on June 20, 2008, 08:25:24 PM
How so?
I'm not even going to bother asking. Socks would defend frickin' Hoover.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 20, 2008, 09:42:20 PM
Quote from: houdinie on June 20, 2008, 09:29:19 PM
I'm not even going to bother asking. Socks would defend frickin' Hoover.


You can't blame Hoover for most of what happened.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on June 20, 2008, 09:45:36 PM
Quote from: Socks on June 20, 2008, 09:42:20 PM
You can't blame Hoover for most of what happened.

I can, however, blame Coolidge.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on June 20, 2008, 09:48:32 PM
Quote from: houdinie on June 20, 2008, 09:45:36 PM
I can, however, blame Coolidge.


I never liked that guy.  baddood;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Selkie on June 28, 2008, 07:17:00 PM
Mallard Fillmore speaks volumes

(http://www.jewishworldreview.com/strips/mallard/2000/MFT20080624.jpg)
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: just1more on June 30, 2008, 04:02:52 PM
Quote from: Selkie224 on June 28, 2008, 07:17:00 PM
Mallard Fillmore speaks volumes

(http://www.jewishworldreview.com/strips/mallard/2000/MFT20080624.jpg)

If you read the ingredients, you'll find that it's very healthy for you!  caterpie;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: hotlikesauce. on July 05, 2008, 12:42:43 PM
Quote from: wolflink64 on June 09, 2008, 04:42:23 PM
lol Nader.

Oh, and unanimous Obama vote makes this place infinitely better than NS2.


"i cant take it that someone has adifferent opinion. that place sucks. i must be god"


Get off the internet, seriously.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: just1more on July 05, 2008, 12:54:40 PM
Just a few awesome political websites so you guys and stay up to date and informed:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com

http://www.electoral-vote.com

http://www.270towin.com

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 05, 2008, 03:27:07 PM
Quote from: Socks on June 20, 2008, 08:20:33 PM
Great President.  baddood;
lmao

No.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: The artist formally known on July 05, 2008, 04:53:14 PM
Quote from: Selkie224 on June 28, 2008, 07:17:00 PM
Mallard Fillmore speaks volumes

(http://www.jewishworldreview.com/strips/mallard/2000/MFT20080624.jpg)
Nicely done, I had the same thought.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: hotlikesauce. on July 06, 2008, 09:16:21 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on July 05, 2008, 03:27:07 PM
lmao

No.


How is Ronald Reagan not a great president? Quick being a dickhole.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: just1more on July 08, 2008, 02:43:44 PM
Quote from: Silent Rob on July 06, 2008, 09:16:21 AM
How is Ronald Reagan not a great president? Quick being a dickhole.

He sucked on big oil's cock, long time. Plus, he had Bush I as VP.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 08, 2008, 03:10:30 PM
Quote from: Silent Rob on July 06, 2008, 09:16:21 AM
How is Ronald Reagan not a great president? Quick being a dickhole.
"let's get tough on crime"
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on July 10, 2008, 09:23:06 AM
Quote from: Silent Rob on July 06, 2008, 09:16:21 AM
How is Ronald Reagan not a great president? Quick being a dickhole.
Contra
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 10, 2008, 01:48:46 PM
Quote from: Yprie on July 10, 2008, 09:23:06 AM
Contra
Turrican
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: mariofreak on July 11, 2008, 07:37:36 PM
@ the people seriously voting for Nader or Barr:

Why? You know they aren't going to win. It's a waste of a vote.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 11, 2008, 07:39:03 PM
Quote from: mariofreak on July 11, 2008, 07:37:36 PM
@ the people seriously voting for Nader or Barr:

Why? You know they aren't going to win. It's a waste of a vote.
but they're better than both obama and mccain
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: mariofreak on July 11, 2008, 07:58:01 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on July 11, 2008, 07:39:03 PM
but they're better than both obama and mccain
i'm sure even if somebody was voting for nader, they would have a preference between obama and mccain. why don't you make your vote count?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 11, 2008, 08:39:30 PM
Quote from: mariofreak on July 11, 2008, 07:58:01 PM
i'm sure even if somebody was voting for nader, they would have a preference between obama and mccain. why don't you make your vote count?
if everyone that thought nader was cool voted for him, we wouldn't have to worry about obama and mccain
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: mariofreak on July 14, 2008, 12:33:06 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on July 11, 2008, 08:39:30 PM
if everyone that thought nader was cool voted for him, we wouldn't have to worry about obama and mccain
there aren't enough tree humpers in the world to beat obama or mccain
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Hiro on July 14, 2008, 12:37:20 AM
Nader will lead the mole people party to victory! But seriously, my dad thinks Obama doesn't stand a chance.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: hotlikesauce. on July 14, 2008, 04:29:54 AM
Quote from: mariofreak on July 11, 2008, 07:37:36 PM
@ the people seriously voting for Nader or Barr:

Why? You know they aren't going to win. It's a waste of a vote.


Barr wasn't that bad in the House (i think it was).


He's better than McCain and Obama.





McCain has voters cause he's the famous white republican. Obama is getting voters because he's black.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 14, 2008, 06:32:45 AM
Quote from: Silent Rob on July 14, 2008, 04:29:54 AM
Barr wasn't that bad in the House (i think it was).


He's better than McCain and Obama.





McCain has voters cause he's the famous white republican. Obama is getting voters because he's black.
People used to support Obama because he actually seemed pretty good; now he's honestly not seeming much better than McCain with his "khjgskdhjfgs FOR ISRAEL" crap.

really, i don't give a shit about israel and i don't care if anyone attacks them

also, as time goes on, the more he's stating how much he supports everything done by bush just to get old white bastards
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on July 14, 2008, 08:27:55 AM
When McCain wins who will leave Boyah out of protest?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 14, 2008, 08:43:35 AM
Quote from: Socks on July 14, 2008, 08:27:55 AM
When McCain wins who will leave Boyah out of protest?
I'll be leaving the US.

Zayna can stay in California, and I'll just wait for her in some other nation.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on July 17, 2008, 05:39:58 PM
Quote from: Socks on July 14, 2008, 08:27:55 AM
When McCain wins who will leave Boyah out of protest?
If McCain wins there will be no freedom on the internet.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on July 18, 2008, 08:10:47 AM
Quote from: JMV on July 17, 2008, 05:39:58 PM
If McCain wins there will be no freedom on the internet.


Cool.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on July 18, 2008, 08:26:44 AM
Quote from: Socks on July 18, 2008, 08:10:47 AM
Cool.
You're worse than Lawlz at debating. doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on July 18, 2008, 10:25:30 AM
Quote from: JMV on July 17, 2008, 05:39:58 PM
If McCain wins there will be no freedom on the internet.
I find that hard to believe...
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Meta Ridley on July 18, 2008, 11:31:06 AM
Obama fails, and so does everyone who supports him. Case and point is below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3_jh2dO78U

No matter who wins, the US is still screwed. No one will change anything. However, anyone who falls for obama's pathetic attempts at promising peace and change in america is dumb. 100% serious.

I hate all the candidates, and I hate politicians. But if I had to choose, id go with McCain.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 18, 2008, 01:15:20 PM
Quote from: Meta Ridley on July 18, 2008, 11:31:06 AM
Obama fails, and so does everyone who supports him. Case and point is below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3_jh2dO78U

No matter who wins, the US is still screwed. No one will change anything. However, anyone who falls for obama's pathetic attempts at promising peace and change in america is dumb. 100% serious.

I hate all the candidates, and I hate politicians. But if I had to choose, id go with McCain.
I'm not liking Obama much of late, but anything is better than that dumb cunt McCain.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on July 18, 2008, 08:33:02 PM
Quote from: JMV on July 18, 2008, 08:26:44 AM
You're worse than Lawlz at debating.


Why would I debate silliness?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on July 18, 2008, 08:51:09 PM
Quote from: Socks on July 18, 2008, 08:33:02 PM
Why would I debate silliness?
It's not a silly issue.  McCain doesn't support Net Neutrality: Obama does.  And it's not just the freedom to use something like Boyah that would be at risk.  ISPs would be able to filter whatever content they please(as they have already begun throttling p2p traffic).  Tiered services (http://boyah.net/forums/index.php/topic,14704.0.html) would put many people at a disadvantage.  Regardless of who you are, you have access to the same information as anyone else with an internet connection.  If you're poor you can access the same sites as the wealthy without your ISP deciding otherwise.  Freedom of speech is covered under it.

The great thing about freedom on the internet is that people can find almost anything(even if it's the occasional not so good thing) instantly--without government censorship.

There have been governmental attempts to try editing Wikipedia(I believe it was the FBI or DHS doing it) to make certain articles seem more favorable.  Freedom on the internet allowed the misinformation to be fixed.  Sites like Wikileaks (http://wikileaks.org/) are only possible with such freedom.
Without net neutrality such freedom to access accurate information quickly will be compromised.

Don't even get me started on china style censorship that would be possible without net neutrality.


So, before saying such is "silliness" think things through and think about all of the Candidate's policies.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on July 18, 2008, 09:04:15 PM
The internet does not belong to the US, it can't police it.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on July 18, 2008, 09:13:23 PM
Quote from: Socks on July 18, 2008, 09:04:15 PM
The internet does not belong to the US, it can't police it.
It can, however, police the activity that goes on inside of it. A simple DNS block or redirect can prevent citizens from accessing the sites.  They can shut down the physical servers if they're hosted in the country.  It's highly possible. I know some ISPs currently block sites like 4Chan.  Schools block websites: think of that on a grand scale.  It happens in China, Saudi Arabia, and several other Middle Eastern nations.  It can, and if network neutrality isn't protected will, happen here.

I can go into technical details here but I doubt you want to hear all of the computer type stuff, but I know what I'm talking about here.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on July 18, 2008, 09:24:02 PM
Never happen, the internet represents an ever increasing economic powerhouse, and that means lobbyists, not to mention that it is being integrated into everyday life more and more. As time goes on not only will these things increase but so will the demographics constantly change in favor of a generation who has grown up with it since day one.

Or you can always move to Canada.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on July 18, 2008, 09:37:04 PM
Quote from: Socks on July 18, 2008, 09:24:02 PM
Never happen, the internet represents an ever increasing economic powerhouse, and that means lobbyists
You mean like the RIAA? Or how the Government has already attempted to shutdown sites like wikileaks, or how the ISPs themselves don't support net neutrality?
Quotenot to mention that it is being integrated into everyday life more and more. As time goes on not only will these things increase but so will the demographics constantly change in favor of a generation who has grown up with it since day one.
Changing to something that is becoming more acceptable?  A conservative?  What?

QuoteOr you can always move to Canada.
naw b.  If I move anywhere it's going to be Sweden.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 19, 2008, 01:38:02 AM
Quote from: Socks on July 18, 2008, 09:24:02 PM
Never happen, the internet represents an ever increasing economic powerhouse, and that means lobbyists, not to mention that it is being integrated into everyday life more and more. As time goes on not only will these things increase but so will the demographics constantly change in favor of a generation who has grown up with it since day one.

Or you can always move to Canada.
I can't see it not happening.

Why wouldn't the government want to censor the internet so that only favorable information reaches the people?  Why would they want regular people like us getting rich overnight by providing cheap or free services to the people and not stuffing any money in their pockets? Having to pay for individual websites like we do TV channels would make ISPs, the government, and existing big companies even richer, so why wouldn't they support it?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on July 19, 2008, 10:13:26 AM
Quote from: Meta Ridley on July 18, 2008, 11:31:06 AM
Case and point is below.
oh boy i can't wait
Quote from: Meta Ridley on July 18, 2008, 11:31:06 AM
http://www.youtube.com
oh doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on July 19, 2008, 08:53:35 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 19, 2008, 10:13:26 AM
toh doodthing;
Speak for yourself. I am now thoroughly convinced that Barack Obama would make a bad president because I watched a cartoon on Youtube.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: mariofreak on July 27, 2008, 03:38:53 PM
Quote from: Silent Rob on July 14, 2008, 04:29:54 AM
Barr wasn't that bad in the House (i think it was).


He's better than McCain and Obama.





McCain has voters cause he's the famous white republican. Obama is getting voters because he's black.
Of course you might think he's better. That doesn't mean voting for him will affect anything at all.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ncba93ivyase on July 27, 2008, 08:35:12 PM
Quote from: mariofreak on July 27, 2008, 03:38:53 PM
Of course you might think he's better. That doesn't mean voting for him will affect anything at all.
if everyone voted for ralph nader and didn't have that stupid "lol it won't matter" idea lodged in their brain, we'd have a president that didn't suck
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: just1more on July 28, 2008, 04:07:23 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2008, 08:35:12 PM
if everyone voted for ralph nader and didn't have that stupid "lol it won't matter" idea lodged in their brain, we'd have a president that didn't suck

People don't vote for Ralph Nader because he's an attention whore.

And it also has a lot to do with the national media, which can't comprehend how to cover more than two candidates in a given race.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: mariofreak on August 13, 2008, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2008, 08:35:12 PM
if everyone voted for ralph nader and didn't have that stupid "lol it won't matter" idea lodged in their brain, we'd have a president that didn't suck
funny how you talk so much shit about marijuana and pretty much all ralph nader supporters support him for the sole fact that he would legalize it. the only reason you are saying that he would not suck is because he's different and you just want to be controversial and say that all presidential canidates are terrible and that the country is a pile of shit that can't be fixed unless we all vote for ralph nader who you probably don't even know his stance on most things.

lern poltix
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on August 13, 2008, 08:47:12 PM
Quote from: Purloiner of Hares on August 13, 2008, 08:24:07 PM
The ridiculous dual-party system isn't really a result of the media, it's just the way our country's political system has evolved from the demographics that it has grown out of over the decades/centuries.

I don't think I've posted my thoughts in this thread before. If I could vote this fall and Obama/McCain were surely the candidates I would vote independent purely on basis of protesting the two-party system. McCain's a fucking moron and I'd quite like to leave the country if his cabinet was running it. Obama isn't exactly my dream candidate either.

In my opinion the best possible FEASIBLE presidential team would be Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. They've said someway or another that they'd consider running with each other, and I really think that that would be the best thing that could happen to American politics right now.
- Why don't you like Obama
- Why do you like Kucinich
- Why do you like Paul
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on August 13, 2008, 10:29:33 PM
Quote from: Purloiner of Hares on August 13, 2008, 10:02:12 PM
I don't dislike Obama, I'm just not going to put a sign up in my yard or anything. I feel like he talks about many big important things that need to be done, but once he gets in office he won't followup or have take the initiative to actually get these things done thoroughly. Foreign policy, he's definitely not a seasoned pro there; nothing a good VP can't help though.
what makes you think any other politician would be any different
and since when do either kucinich or paul have foreign policy credentials

Quote from: Purloiner of Hares on August 13, 2008, 10:02:12 PM
Kucinich is a guy I've liked for a long time because he is one of the few politicians I've seen who transcends the politician mold more than those around him...
problem: he has no influence whatsoever
Quote from: Purloiner of Hares on August 13, 2008, 10:02:12 PM
...for instance [Ron Paul's] campaign officially states that he is pro-life, but he is personally pro-choice.
what doodthing; (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul#Pro-life_legislation)
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Beta on August 15, 2008, 08:49:51 AM
I personally think Oboma will win, if he chooses Hilary to be his vice president.  keke;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on August 15, 2008, 06:16:22 PM
Quote from: ââ,,¢Â¥Betaââ,,¢Â¥ on August 15, 2008, 08:49:51 AM
I personally think Oboma will win, if he chooses Hilary to be his vice president.  keke;
Ew please no
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: :atomsk: on August 16, 2008, 02:51:46 PM
Quote from: ââ,,¢Â¥Betaââ,,¢Â¥ on August 15, 2008, 08:49:51 AM
I personally think Oboma will win, if he chooses Hilary to be his vice president.  keke;

I hope that won't and doubt that will happen.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on September 17, 2008, 04:58:48 PM
Why did no one comment on Palin?

Also, if you're 18 or turning 18 in the next month or so; http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/17/94016/0264/300/591612
Remember to register soon.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 17, 2008, 05:33:30 PM
She's a Vice President, she's not that important.

I'm undecided right now, but I'm turning away from Obama because of his plans for big government programs. I'm not a fan of them, and at least McCain says he wants to curb the federal government's involvement and spending. They're both pretty shitty candidates, but I guess I'll go with the lesser evil in the end...
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on September 17, 2008, 05:40:21 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 05:33:30 PM
She's a Vice President, she's not that important.

I'm undecided right now, but I'm turning away from Obama because of his plans for big government programs. I'm not a fan of them, and at least McCain says he wants to curb the federal government's involvement and spending. They're both pretty shitty candidates, but I guess I'll go with the lesser evil in the end...
no, she's a vice presidential candidate

what programs doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 17, 2008, 06:08:42 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on September 17, 2008, 05:40:21 PM
no, she's a vice presidential candidate

what programs doodthing;


oh yeah, with all the hype surrounding her i forgot there are other vp candidates

taken from the obama campaign site thing:

Mandatory Coverage of Children: Obama and Biden will require that all children have health care coverage. Obama and Biden will expand the number of options for young adults to get coverage, including allowing young people up to age 25 to continue coverage through their parents' plans.

The Obama-Biden Plan to Cover Uninsured Americans: Obama and Biden will make available a new national health plan to all Americans, including the self-employed and small businesses, to buy affordable health coverage that is similar to the plan available to members of Congress.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on September 17, 2008, 06:15:20 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 05:33:30 PMI'm not a fan of them, and at least McCain says he wants to curb the federal government's involvement and spending. They're both pretty shitty candidates, but I guess I'll go with the lesser evil in the end...
doesn't the federal government spend to pay for the war which mccain supports?
mccain also supports many of bush's policies, which currently have us in a huge deficit and banks failing, and the federal government having to support freddie mac/fannie mae and aig.

but mccain totally hates spending.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 17, 2008, 06:18:52 PM
Quote from: Khadafi on September 17, 2008, 06:15:20 PM
doesn't the federal government spend to pay for the war which mccain supports?
mccain also supports many of bush's policies, which currently have us in a huge deficit and banks failing, and the federal government having to support freddie mac/fannie mae and aig.

but mccain totally hates spending.


i dunno i hear that mccain wants the federal government to stop supporting businesses like that

the war in iraq is a shithole no matter what the next president does; withdraw or stay in, it'll still be a major problem, so don't think obama will make it magically disappear

if only ron pawl stayed in the race  >.<
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on September 17, 2008, 06:40:32 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 06:18:52 PM
if only ron pawl stayed in the race  >.<
then he still would have lost
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 06:08:42 PM
taken from the obama campaign site thing:

Mandatory Coverage of Children: Obama and Biden will require that all children have health care coverage. Obama and Biden will expand the number of options for young adults to get coverage, including allowing young people up to age 25 to continue coverage through their parents' plans.

The Obama-Biden Plan to Cover Uninsured Americans: Obama and Biden will make available a new national health plan to all Americans, including the self-employed and small businesses, to buy affordable health coverage that is similar to the plan available to members of Congress.
yeah what assholes, making sure that children have health insurance while still cutting taxes for the middle class more than mccain's plan would how irresponsible doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 17, 2008, 07:14:05 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on September 17, 2008, 06:40:32 PM
then he still would have lostyeah what assholes, making sure that children have health insurance while still cutting taxes for the middle class more than mccain's plan would how irresponsible doodthing;


why the hell do kids need health insurance

to cover the cost of their boo boos?  doodthing;

if they're going to fund more programs according to their website and give back all these credits to small businesses and shit, and with the huge deficit we have, how does cutting taxes solve anything
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Ezloﺕ on September 17, 2008, 07:15:13 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 07:14:05 PM
why the hell do kids need health insurance

to cover the cost of their boo boos?  doodthing;

if they're going to fund more programs according to their website and give back all these credits to small businesses and shit, and with the huge deficit we have, how does cutting taxes solve anything
wait so just because they're children, they can't get diseases like adults

or anything like that
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 17, 2008, 07:18:23 PM
Quote from: Ezlo on September 17, 2008, 07:15:13 PM
wait so just because they're children, they can't get diseases like adults

or anything like that


how does mandatory spending controlled by the government solve anything that couldn't be done before

insurance is such a huge scam, you never see most of the money back, which you could, i dunno, be spending on necessities right here and now
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 17, 2008, 07:26:37 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 07:18:23 PM
how does mandatory spending controlled by the government solve anything that couldn't be done before

insurance is such a huge scam, you never see most of the money back, which you could, i dunno, be spending on necessities right here and now
What necessities are you missing
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 17, 2008, 07:32:33 PM
Quote from: Flying Circus on September 17, 2008, 07:26:37 PM
What necessities are you missing


what i mean is, why can't families be expected to do the right thing with their money than have some third party control it

politicians use a similar argument when talking in favor of public education

"don't you want your children to have a proper education?"

I think i'll hold on to my own money and hire the people I can trust to teach my children when the time comes, not have them march in hordes to sit in front of people that can't give a shit to if the kids understand what they're teaching them

it's just another form of control and indoctrination
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on September 18, 2008, 05:22:20 AM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 07:14:05 PM
why the hell do kids need health insurance
gahahaha okay you win
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 18, 2008, 05:07:31 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on September 18, 2008, 05:22:20 AM
gahahaha okay you win


...I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.  :(
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Ezloﺕ on September 18, 2008, 05:14:31 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 18, 2008, 05:07:31 PM
...I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.  :(
No. He's being absolutely serious.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 18, 2008, 05:17:17 PM
Quote from: Ezlo on September 18, 2008, 05:14:31 PM
No. He's being absolutely serious.


Now you're just making it worse.  doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on September 18, 2008, 06:20:33 PM
wow   ur dumb
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on September 19, 2008, 09:59:56 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 17, 2008, 07:32:33 PM
what i mean is, why can't families be expected to do the right thing with their money than have some third party control it

politicians use a similar argument when talking in favor of public education

"don't you want your children to have a proper education?"

I think i'll hold on to my own money and hire the people I can trust to teach my children when the time comes, not have them march in hordes to sit in front of people that can't give a shit to if the kids understand what they're teaching them

it's just another form of control and indoctrination
Fun fact: A whole lot of people can't afford private education. I know it must be a shock, but not everyone is as privileged as you are.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 20, 2008, 09:57:19 AM
Quote from: Houdini on September 19, 2008, 09:59:56 PM
Fun fact: A whole lot of people can't afford private education. I know it must be a shock, but not everyone is as privileged as you are.


Fun fact: They can't afford private education because they're too busy paying for 'public' schooling through inflated state taxes. I also find that it is unfair for people who don't have kids who go to school to also have to pay for the public education system. The current system we have is horribly flawed and corrupt, and should be destroyed.

I've been in the public education system since the first grade. The first private school I'll be going to is college.  caterpie;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: just1more on September 20, 2008, 01:17:43 PM
I still can't believe he picked Palin.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 20, 2008, 08:34:18 PM
Quote from: Red Lightning on September 20, 2008, 01:17:43 PM
I still can't believe he picked Palin.


She's better than another Dick Cheney though.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on September 20, 2008, 08:35:45 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 20, 2008, 08:34:18 PM
She's better than another Dick Cheney though.
Not really. She's more or less the Bush to McCain's Cheney.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on September 20, 2008, 09:17:42 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 20, 2008, 09:57:19 AM
Fun fact: They can't afford private education because they're too busy paying for 'public' schooling through inflated state taxes.

I also find that it is unfair for people who don't have kids who go to school to also have to pay for the public education system.
what percentage of taxes go to public education

perhaps somewhat more reasonable, but then what's the point of taxpayer supported public education when only the people who use it pay for it (hint: that would make it pretty much like private education) doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Hensa on September 21, 2008, 02:46:21 AM
After the last 8 years, I have decided to give up on politics for a while and not vote for either canidate.

If I was going to vote, id vote McCain/Palin.
Go ahead and start throwing the tomatos.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on September 21, 2008, 07:01:38 AM
Quote from: Nurse ProtectedMember32 on September 21, 2008, 02:46:21 AM
After the last 8 years, I have decided to give up on politics for a while and not vote for either canidate.

If I was going to vote, id vote McCain/Palin.
Go ahead and start throwing the tomatos.


why
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Hensa on September 21, 2008, 07:54:15 AM
Quote from: Nyerp@#%^&* on September 21, 2008, 07:01:38 AM
why
I get a bad vibe from Obama.

I think he may be good at lying.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on September 21, 2008, 08:13:27 AM
Quote from: Nurse ProtectedMember32 on September 21, 2008, 07:54:15 AM
I get a bad vibe from Obama.

I think he may be good at lying.
oh wow, a vibe doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Hensa on September 21, 2008, 08:17:04 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on September 21, 2008, 08:13:27 AM
oh wow, a vibe doodthing;
im not very political, as you might guess.  :(
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on September 21, 2008, 11:26:49 AM
Quote from: Nurse ProtectedMember32 on September 21, 2008, 07:54:15 AM
I get a bad vibe from Obama.

I think he may be good at lying.
i dont trust them darkies neither
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 21, 2008, 12:45:21 PM
Quote from: Nurse ProtectedMember32 on September 21, 2008, 07:54:15 AM
I get a bad vibe from Obama.

I think he may be good at lying.
I think it's because you're from Texas
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Classic on September 21, 2008, 12:49:55 PM
Quote from: Flying Circus on September 21, 2008, 12:45:21 PM
I think it's because you're from Texas

All I see on my way to work are giant yard signs that say "McCain and Palin 2008". giggle;
There was one sign that said Obama 2008, but it was the Democratic meeting center.



Personally, I may stay away from voting this year.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 21, 2008, 01:41:21 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on September 20, 2008, 09:17:42 PM
what percentage of taxes go to public education

perhaps somewhat more reasonable, but then what's the point of taxpayer supported public education when only the people who use it pay for it (hint: that would make it pretty much like private education) doodthing;


From http://www.assemblydems.com/pdf/0809Session/prroberts042108.pdf :

"Roughly 55 percent of the average New Jersey homeownerââ,¬â,,¢s property taxpayer bill goes to support
local schools. Public education also accounts for roughly one-third of all state spending."

So a little more than half of the taxes paid by people without children who go to a public school doesn't go into something they can use; what the hell is that?

Quote from: Houdini on September 20, 2008, 08:35:45 PM
Not really. She's more or less the Bush to McCain's Cheney.


I'd like you to expand a bit on this assertion.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Hiro on September 21, 2008, 01:43:28 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 21, 2008, 01:41:21 PM
From http://www.assemblydems.com/pdf/0809Session/prroberts042108.pdf :

"Roughly 55 percent of the average New Jersey homeownerââ,¬â,,¢s property taxpayer bill goes to support
local schools. Public education also accounts for roughly one-third of all state spending."

So a little more than half of the taxes paid by people without children who go to a public school doesn't go into something they can use; what the hell is that?

I'd like you to expand a bit on this assertion.
I'm not too sure on the McCain = Cheney thing, but Palin is similar to Bush in that they both have around the same amount of competence for the job.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 21, 2008, 02:12:56 PM
Quote from: They Call Me Classic on September 21, 2008, 12:49:55 PM
All I see on my way to work are giant yard signs that say "McCain and Palin 2008". giggle;
There was one sign that said Obama 2008, but it was the Democratic meeting center.



Personally, I may stay away from voting this year.
Thank goodness for Austin
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on September 21, 2008, 03:31:04 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 21, 2008, 01:41:21 PM
I'd like you to expand a bit on this assertion.
McCain is the corrupt schemer, Palin is there to get attention and make the campaign more attractive to shallow voters.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on September 21, 2008, 05:28:24 PM
I wonder how many niggers are only voting for Obama because he's black. Same with racists for McCain.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 21, 2008, 05:32:35 PM
Quote from: Det. ;] on September 21, 2008, 05:28:24 PM
I wonder how many niggers are only voting for Obama because he's black. Same with racists for McCain.
Some black people aren't voting for Obama because they say he's not black enough lol
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on September 21, 2008, 05:40:26 PM
Quote from: Det. ;] on September 21, 2008, 05:28:24 PM
I wonder how many niggers are only voting for Obama because he's black. Same with racists for McCain.
well the thing is that blacks overwhelmingly vote democratic anyways so that would be hard to tell
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on September 21, 2008, 06:03:17 PM
I wonder how many bitches are only voting for Palin and mccain because she's female. Same with niggers for Obama.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on September 21, 2008, 06:07:21 PM
vote ron paul
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Meyer Lansky on September 22, 2008, 07:23:35 AM
Quote from: Flying Circus on September 21, 2008, 05:32:35 PM
Some black people aren't voting for Obama because they say he's not black enough lol
You obviously misunderstand what they mean.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 22, 2008, 01:21:02 PM
Quote from: Back In '88 on September 22, 2008, 07:23:35 AM
You obviously misunderstand what they mean.
He did not have the slave experience, so he's not black. Some lady on the Daily Show was going on about that some months ago.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 22, 2008, 01:51:16 PM
Quote from: Flying Circus on September 22, 2008, 01:21:02 PM
He did not have the slave experience, so he's not black. Some lady on the Daily Show was going on about that some months ago.


No one today has the slave experience.  doodthing;

Unless you're a slave.  doodella;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 22, 2008, 02:09:19 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 22, 2008, 01:51:16 PM
No one today has the slave experience.  doodthing;

Unless you're a slave.  doodella;
His ancestors, whatever
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 22, 2008, 02:24:35 PM
Quote from: Flying Circus on September 22, 2008, 02:09:19 PM
His ancestors, whatever


My ancestors were probably slaves in the Roman Empire.

Does that make me any more black?  doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on September 22, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 22, 2008, 02:24:35 PM
My ancestors were probably slaves in the Roman Empire.

Does that make me any more black?  doodthing;
Slavery wasn't based on race in the Roman Empire. And I meant in America...
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on September 22, 2008, 02:55:19 PM
So, what does it mean to be black?

Does it mean to have ancestors who were slaves in America? I don't know what people are getting at with this.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on September 22, 2008, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Rycerz on September 22, 2008, 02:55:19 PM
So, what does it mean to be black?

Does it mean to have ancestors who were slaves in America? I don't know what people are getting at with this.


that's the stupidest shit i've ever heard befuddlement

people are idiots
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Ezloﺕ on September 22, 2008, 04:07:59 PM
Quote from: joeinc on September 21, 2008, 06:07:21 PM
vote ron paul
who
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Meyer Lansky on September 23, 2008, 05:00:51 PM
Quote from: Flying Circus on September 22, 2008, 01:21:02 PM
He did not have the slave experience, so he's not black.
No, it is more along the lines that he did not experience the hardships and discrimination that the civil rights generation did.

There is a huge rift between the black generation of yesteryear and the black generation of today.

It is almost as if the older black people see the way that the young black people conduct themselves today and say "This is not why we were hosed, for you to act and dress and speak this way." But then the younger generation responds, "Yes it is.", because the whole point of the civil rights movement was to gain the freedoms that blacks have today.

The majority of black people today have forgotten who they are and where they come from, at least in the opinion of the older, civil rights generation.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on September 23, 2008, 05:34:32 PM
Quote from: Ezlo on September 22, 2008, 04:07:59 PM
who
i dont know
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: just1more on October 16, 2008, 07:54:29 AM
Holy shit. Obama has this in the bag. McCain acted like a complete asshole in last night's debate.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: l a c e y on October 28, 2008, 06:33:24 AM
i love obama.
hes gunna win forsure.
except that someone is gunna try and kill him.
or has already tried.
poor guy.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on October 28, 2008, 09:52:49 AM
Yeah, I'd want to vote for someone who thinks we have 57 states.  befuddlement
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on October 28, 2008, 10:56:07 AM
Quote from: Knig on October 28, 2008, 09:52:49 AM
Yeah, I'd want to vote for someone who thinks we have 57 states.  befuddlement
he said that after many, many days of campaigning and accidentally said he'd visited 57 rather than 47 states doodthing;

mccain has confused sunnis and shi'ites, has referenced an 'iraq/pakistan border', and referred to putin as germany's president
in conclusion, everyone misspeaks from time to time, and a slip of the tongue is no reason to vote against someone doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on October 28, 2008, 01:07:03 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 28, 2008, 10:56:07 AM
he said that after many, many days of campaigning and accidentally said he'd visited 57 rather than 47 states doodthing;

mccain has confused sunnis and shi'ites, has referenced an 'iraq/pakistan border', and referred to putin as germany's president
in conclusion, everyone misspeaks from time to time, and a slip of the tongue is no reason to vote against someone doodthing;


I know that McCain is a dumbass too, comparing one idiot to another doesn't make them any better.  doodthing;  doodthing;  doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on October 28, 2008, 01:09:10 PM
Quote from: Knig on October 28, 2008, 01:07:03 PM
I know that McCain is a dumbass too, comparing one idiot to another doesn't make them any better.  doodthing;  doodthing;  doodthing;
the point is that mr. obama is not an idiot

maybe we should go through the nsa's daily transcripts of your conversations and dig up all the times you've misspoken
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Geno on October 28, 2008, 02:28:02 PM
I was hearing today in school that there was an assassination attempt on Obama last night.
Is this true?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: wawi on October 28, 2008, 02:41:01 PM
Quote from: Geno on October 28, 2008, 02:28:02 PM
I was hearing today in school that there was an assassination attempt on Obama last night.
Is this true?

I wouldn't necessarily call it an attempt. It was rather a plot.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/10/27/obama.plot/index.html?iref=newssearch
QuoteSTORY HIGHLIGHTS
-Plot included killing 100 African-Americans, beheading 14, officials say
-Plot was to end with attempt to kill Obama while wearing white, police say
-Law enforcement sources sees no evidence men could pull off plot
-Federal prosecutors charge Daniel Cowart, 20, and Paul Schlesselman, 18

Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Knig on October 28, 2008, 03:45:12 PM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 28, 2008, 01:09:10 PM
the point is that mr. obama is not an idiot

maybe we should go through the nsa's daily transcripts of your conversations and dig up all the times you've misspoken


Only to find to your astonishment what an intelligent speaker I am.  n_u


I find it really disappointing that of all of the capable men and women that should be in this country, either Obama or McCain will fill the spot of the face of America. I feel that both men are not competent enough for the job.

I'll still be voting, likely for McCain as a preliminary effort to stop the judge appointments and socialist programs Obama will most likely introduce if he gets into office.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on October 28, 2008, 03:54:52 PM
Quote from: Knig on October 28, 2008, 03:45:12 PM
I'll still be voting, likely for McCain as a preliminary effort to stop the judge appointments and socialist programs Obama will most likely introduce if he gets into office.
doodthing;

Quote from: Knig on October 28, 2008, 03:45:12 PM
I find it really disappointing that of all of the capable men and women that should be in this country, either Obama or McCain will fill the spot of the face of America. I feel that both men are not competent enough for the job.
(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/5776/americanflagjz2.gif) RON PAUL '08 (http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/5776/americanflagjz2.gif)
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on October 28, 2008, 04:45:17 PM
wait obama is a socialist what since when

that means i should vote for him twice
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Meyer Lansky on October 28, 2008, 04:51:51 PM
Quote from: Khadafi on October 28, 2008, 04:45:17 PM
wait obama is a socialist what since when
Since dumbfucks who are blindly anti-Obama stopped deciding to educate themselves and learn what socialism and communism really is.

Soooooooo, since forever ago?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on October 28, 2008, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Khadafi on October 28, 2008, 04:45:17 PM
wait obama is a socialist what since when

that means i should vote for him twice
i like how the actual socialist candidates have been disputing that claim
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on October 29, 2008, 08:56:27 PM
Oh why am I still voting for McCain?  :'(
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on October 30, 2008, 04:28:34 AM
Quote from: Socks on October 29, 2008, 08:56:27 PM
Oh why am I still voting for McCain?  :'(


who knows
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: ME## on October 31, 2008, 03:34:51 PM
Quote from: Socks on October 29, 2008, 08:56:27 PM
Oh why am I still voting for McCain?  :'(


Because you believe that McCain will be more able to protect the US from its enemies?  hocuspocus;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Socks on October 31, 2008, 08:30:56 PM
Quote from: ME86 on October 31, 2008, 03:34:51 PM
Because you believe that McCain will be more able to protect the US from its enemies?


You get candy for this.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 06:47:40 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 28, 2008, 10:56:07 AM
he said that after many, many days of campaigning and accidentally said he'd visited 57 rather than 47 states doodthing;


as if that's an excuse for saying a completely different number. i don't know how the hell anyone can fuck that up. psyduck;

Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 28, 2008, 01:09:10 PM
maybe we should go through the nsa's daily transcripts of your conversations and dig up all the times you've misspoken


he's not running for president of the united states of america.  doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 07:01:10 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 06:47:40 AM
as if that's an excuse for saying a completely different number. i don't know how the hell anyone can fuck that up. psyduck;

he's not running for president of the united states of america.  doodthing;
completely different in that he said fifty instead of forty

and that somehow has an effect on how often someone flubs a line?  doodhuh;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 07:22:55 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on November 01, 2008, 07:01:10 AM
completely different in that he said fifty instead of forty

and that somehow has an effect on how often someone flubs a line?  doodhuh;


or that the phrase '57 states' shouldn't even cross his mind in the first place.

oh yes, sure, let's have a shitty public speaker to represent and be president of our country. he probably won't be talking to any foreign countries or anything, and when he says '57 states' again, that won't embarrass us one bit. ^_________^
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 07:25:30 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 07:22:55 AM
or that the phrase '57 states' shouldn't even cross his mind in the first place.

oh yes, sure, let's have a shitty public speaker to represent and be president of our country. he probably won't be talking to any foreign countries or anything, and when he says '57 states' again, that won't embarrass us one bit. ^_________^
At least he'll known where that nation is and if they are an enemy or not. bassir;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 07:27:39 AM
Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 07:25:30 AM
At least he'll known where that nation is and if they are an enemy or not. bassir;


but not how many states are in his own country: good. ^_____^
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 07:44:25 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 07:27:39 AM
but not how many states are in his own country: good. ^_____^
He knows how many states there are. It was an error after, how many days of campaigning nonstop(unlike McCain who tries to take a break, conveniently before a debate).  He had visited 47 States.  We have 50. It was an error that was simple to make.

And then you have Biden and Palin, the latter of whom lacks any knowledge of American history.

Quote11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?...
...SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.

http://web.archive.org/web/20070501192322/http://eagleforumalaska.blogspot.com/2006/07/2006-gubernatorial-candidate.html
Our founding fathers? That's incredible since the Pledge of Allegiance wasn't written until the 1890s and "Under God" hasn't even been in the pledge for 60 years(added in the 1950's).  THAT IS A GREAT PERSON TO HAVE IN THE SECOND HIGHEST POSITION OF POWER.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 07:46:55 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 07:27:39 AM
but not how many states are in his own country: good. ^_____^
since when doesn't he know the number; he misspoke once doodhuh;

Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 07:22:55 AM
oh yes, sure, let's have a shitty public speaker to represent and be president of our country. he probably won't be talking to any foreign countries or anything, and...that won't embarrass us one bit. ^_________^
are we talking about obama or mccain now @____@
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 07:58:58 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on November 01, 2008, 07:46:55 AM
since when doesn't he know the number; he misspoke once doodhuh;
are we talking about obama or mccain now @____@


y did u putt elispise in dere mistur


Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 07:44:25 AM
He knows how many states there are. It was an error after, how many days of campaigning nonstop(unlike McCain who tries to take a break, conveniently before a debate).  He had visited 47 States.  We have 50. It was an error that was simple to make.


well im glad. im glad that someone who hasn't even fulfilled a full term in the senate, yet is running for president, knows how many states there are. im proud of him. ^___________^
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:04:54 AM
my god det, you would shut the fuck up if you know what's good for you

but apparently you don't, so please continue
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 08:07:17 AM
Quote from: Nefarious Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:04:54 AM
my god det, you would shut the fuck up if you know what's good for you

but apparently you don't, so please continue


my god nyerp, you wouldn't fucking eat so much and be so fucking fat if you knew what's good for you

but apparently you don't, so please continue
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:09:15 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 08:07:17 AM
my god nyerp, you wouldn't fucking eat so much and be so fucking fat if you knew what's good for you

but apparently you don't, so please continue


that had everything to do with this discussion

yay for petty insults! ^____^
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 08:10:41 AM
Quote from: Nefarious Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:09:15 AM
that had everything to do with this discussion

yay for petty insults! ^____^


hey are you done talking about nothing important yet
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:12:19 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 08:10:41 AM
hey are you done talking about nothing important yet


hey are you done trying to use the same argument over and over again and not realizing when people have cornered you yet
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 08:13:30 AM
Quote from: Nefarious Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:12:19 AM
hey are you done trying to use the same argument over and over again and not realizing  when people have cornered you yet


hey are you done not making any fucking sense and whining about kaz and everything else here yet
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 08:14:20 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 08:13:30 AM
hey are you done not making any fucking sense and whining about kaz and everything else here yet


nope, but thanks for asking ^___^
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 08:37:05 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 07:58:58 AMwell im glad. im glad that someone who hasn't even fulfilled a full term in the senate, yet is running for president, knows how many states there are. im proud of him. ^___________^
learly knows how many states there are.

His exact quote:
"I've now been to to 5....7 states, I've got 1 left to go. 1 Left to go, Alaska and Hawaii I was not allowed to go to, but though I really wanted to visit but my staff could not justify it."
1)He doesn't think there are 57 states.
2)It should be clear what he meant. He first was thinking of 50 states, and then stopped to subtract without correcting himself and got the 7 of 47.  doodthing;


You can have the guy who made a mistake with math, after working nonstop for months, or the guy who:
-Claimed Putin was Germany's President
-Cannot say if Spain is an enemy nor where it is located.  As well as not knowing who Spain's president is, he said Zapatero, Spain's PM,  was the President of Spain.
-Sings about bombing other countries


I think we'd have to be more worried about starting a war by offending our allies, antagonizing countries, not having a clue where the countries are, than someone making a small error.

Other than him being black and a 'super secret rofl conspiracy tinfoil hat muslim' what is a reason you don't support him and support McCain?

Taxes?  Yes, Obama's taxes are higher for the richer people, but the less wealthy have lower taxes.  The overall tax shift is higher  All in all, the Democrats who "tax more" are better (http://currencythoughts.com/2008/08/19/how-the-us-economy-performed-under-democrat-and-republican-presidents/) for the economy. (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/18/IN5C13H0J5.DTL)

Abortion? If someone rapes you, do you really want to suffer for 9 months keeping that child?  What if it was a family member who raped you?  What if you found the child had a disease that would give it a painful and short life? What if it held health risks?  Good luck with that under McCain

War? It's been established that we were lead into the war on false information, without the go ahead from the UN.  We found to WMDs, Hussein Offered to go into exile for $1 Billion(read, a small fraction to the money we spent, and an non-comparable value compared to the thousands of lives lost) (http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/3178), the  number of people who support the war is low(less than 30 percent a year or two ago, probably lower now), and we accomplished the "goal"(depending on which one you belive since Bush changed it a few times) and Iraq's leader said he wanted us out, why are you occupying them?

Technology? Net Neutrality vs OH GOD HOW DID THIS GET HERE I AM NOT GOOD WITH COMPUTER. Obama supports regaining our competitiveness in technology (It is a bit sad that we're nowhere near the top in internet speeds, yet our prices are). McCain's technology policy isn't even a policy.


So what is the reason for supporting McCain over Obama other than OMG BLACK PRESIDENT WILL GET SHOT xD and Jesus wants you to* ;)


*wait wut Jesus' views were closer to obamas with the whole taxes and social services thing, but OBAMA IS A SECRET MUSLIM AND MCCAIN HAS PALIN WHO LOVES JESUS SO MUCH THAT HER DAUGHTER WASN'T ALLOWED TO USE A CONDOM VOTE FOR MCCAIN.

Really what is the reason?

Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 08:55:02 AM
det can't even vote, can she doodhuh;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 08:56:05 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on November 01, 2008, 08:55:02 AM
det can't even vote, can she doodhuh;
No, but she still support McCain and I can't see a legit reason.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 09:00:39 AM
lawl i hope you didn't spend from 11:02 - 11:56 typing that, because i ignored all of it.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 09:09:08 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:00:39 AM
lawl i hope you didn't spend from 11:02 - 11:56 typing that, because i ignored all of it.
because I'm right and/or you have no reason to support McCain other than Mommy and Daddy?  bassir;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 09:11:59 AM
Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 09:09:08 AM
because I'm right and/or you have no reason to support McCain other than Mommy and Daddy?  bassir;


bahahahahahahahah

yes jmv
you are god
GOD
you are always right, obama is going to win and do our country complete justice.
what the hell is wrong with me, why would i ever defy the views of james valente?

ill save him some trouble and never talk to him again, im obviously not worthy. :(


also ps, at least i have a mommy and daddy that love me and don't leave me and throw me out of their houses. ;)
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 09:13:23 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:11:59 AM
bahahahahahahahah

yes jmv
you are god
GOD
you are always right, obama is going to win and do our country complete justice.
what the hell is wrong with me, why would i ever defy the views of james valente?

ill save him some trouble and never talk to him again, im obviously not worthy. :(


also ps, at least i have a mommy and daddy that love me and don't leave me and throw me out of their houses. ;)
Or you can say why instead of ignoring the post.  It's pretty ignorant instead of just answering a question. doodhuh;

Or was I right and you have no reason other than what you parents say?
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 09:18:41 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:00:39 AM
lawl i hope you didn't spend from 11:02 - 11:56 typing that, because i ignored all of it.
you sure showed him  n_u
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 09:20:00 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on November 01, 2008, 09:18:41 AM
you sure showed him  n_u
fight the power of liberals and their posts of citations.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: laskfn on November 01, 2008, 09:22:10 AM
Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 09:09:08 AM
because I'm right and/or you have no reason to support McCain other than Mommy and Daddy?  bassir;


Jmv you really need to stop, you're being ridiculous. DEt has every right to support Mccain and you cant force obama in her face because theres "no reason" to like people like Mccain. People can support whoever they want to and its not your reason on earth to tell them that if they dont like the one you like then they're not smart for liking their choice. i support the person regardless of who they like, but one thing i hate is when people go and act like a jerk and preach all about their choice, its like searching for reasons to argue with people.  

baddood;

person 1: so who are you supporting?
person 2: well i like mccain
person 1: OMG WHY DO YOU LIKE MCCAIN, HES OLD YOU'RE SUPPOST TO LIKE OBAMA LIKE ME BECAUSE OBAMA IS KEWLZIES OMG OMG ASS ASS ASS YOU CANT LIKE MCCAIN BECAUSE THERES NO REASON TO LIKE HIM LASNFLKASNLFKASBGFLKASFLKAS
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 09:23:10 AM
Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 09:13:23 AM
Or you can say why instead of ignoring the post.  It's pretty ignorant instead of just answering a question. doodhuh;

Or was I right and you have no reason other than what you parents say?


i was never i aware i said who my parents supported. stop trying to pull that card, bud. n_u

and im not even going to bother saying 26 years of being in the senate vs. 6, which means half the time obama has been in the senate, he's been running for president. he hasn't accomplished anything as a politician, there's absolutely nothing that stands out about him besides his skin color, is basically going to steal from the rich and give to the poor, has outright said he's going to raise taxes, and has no money to pay for 'universal health care' (and those are just the basics), because i know if i do it's going to be like "FJDLKAJGLDKSGJKDSAGJASGLS HEY IM LIBERAL IM ALWAYS RIGHT YOURE WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG." im not going to waste my time with that shit. so don't expect another reply from me about this and think im cowering at my desk because i have no legitmate reason to support mccain.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 09:36:45 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:23:10 AM
...has outright said he's going to raise taxes, and has no money to pay for 'universal health care'...
this makes little sense doodthing;
for one, if he raises taxes as you claim, could that not be used to pay for 'universal health care'
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:23:10 AM
...is basically going to steal from the rich and give to the poor...

uh we've already got a progressive tax system and have had one for a very very long time
mccain used to be a fan of it, too (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/mccain-in-2000.html)

Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 09:22:10 AM
person 1: so who are you supporting?
person 2: well i like mccain
person 1: OMG WHY DO YOU LIKE MCCAIN, HES OLD YOU'RE SUPPOST TO LIKE OBAMA LIKE ME BECAUSE OBAMA IS KEWLZIES OMG OMG ASS ASS ASS YOU CANT LIKE MCCAIN BECAUSE THERES NO REASON TO LIKE HIM LASNFLKASNLFKASBGFLKASFLKAS

det: i don't like the nigger
jmv: why not
det: because
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 01, 2008, 09:40:55 AM
Quote from: Commodore Guff on November 01, 2008, 09:36:45 AM
jmv: why not
det: because


wow, exactly what im talking about.
you fucking debated my reasons and you still just said i didn't have any.
you guys are really pieces of work.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: laskfn on November 01, 2008, 09:45:05 AM
guys just get over it. I like Mccain, and i dont like obama because my sister likes him and kinda because hes oh umm well maybe just a teensy bit black. The only reason i owuld like him is because people would consider me a racist if i didnt.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 09:48:55 AM
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:40:55 AM
wow, exactly what im talking about.
you fucking debated my reasons and you still just said i didn't have any.
you guys are really pieces of work.
the point was that it took you that long to actually provide any reasons
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 09:45:05 AM
guys just get over it. I like Mccain, and i dont like obama because my sister likes him and kinda because hes oh umm well maybe just a teensy bit black. The only reason i owuld like him is because people would consider me a racist if i didnt.
you're really helping your side, you know n_u
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 09:49:42 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 09:22:10 AM
Jmv you really need to stop, you're being ridiculous. DEt has every right to support Mccain and you cant force obama in her face because theres "no reason" to like people like Mccain.
You should have a reason to support a politician, dumbass. This isn't American idol whre you go OMG SANJAYA IS SO SILLY VOTE FOR HIM
QuotePeople can support whoever they want to and its not your reason on earth to tell them that if they dont like the one you like then they're not smart for liking their choice.
I clearly insulted Det and said she wasn't smart.
doodhuh;
Quotei support the person regardless of who they like,
What
Quotebut one thing i hate is when people go and act like a jerk and preach all about their choice, its like searching for reasons to argue with people.  
You mean Christian evangelists?
Quote from: Mary Warren on November 01, 2008, 09:23:10 AM
i was never i aware i said who my parents supported. stop trying to pull that card, bud. n_u
And they do, don't they?


Quoteand im not even going to bother saying 26 years of being in the senate vs. 6, which means half the time obama has been in the senate, he's been running for president.
And look at their VPs. Biden's been on the senate even longer, and Palin...no experience as senator.  Her highest position of power is 2 years as governor of the 3rd least populous state.

Quotehe hasn't accomplished anything as a politician,
He secured the Democratic nomination. He (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deceptive_Practices_and_Voter_Intimidation_Prevention_Act) sure did nothing[url]

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bills_sponsored_by_Barack_Obama_in_the_United_States_Senate)
Quotethere's absolutely nothing that stands out about him besides his skin color,
hey isnt mccain's vp a woman, clearly this is a different situation and you should vote for him.
Quoteis basically going to steal from the rich and give to the poor, has outright said he's going to raise taxes,
On people who make more than $250,000 dollars per year.  Taxing isn't stealing, and he's not giving it to the poor.  He's giving it to the american citizens. Putting the money into schools, healthcare, social programs, and such helps everyone.  It improves the overall wealth of the population.  The rich can still buy an extra porsche, they might just have to wait an extra month for that suede seating.  And as I cited before, the higher taxes generalized by Democratic presidents is better for the economy.  What's better for the economy is better for the people of the country.
Quoteand has no money to pay for 'universal health care' (and those are just the basics),
wut about those evil taxes
Quote
because i know if i do it's going to be like "FJDLKAJGLDKSGJKDSAGJASGLS HEY IM LIBERAL IM ALWAYS RIGHT YOURE WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG." im not going to waste my time with that shit. so don't expect another reply from me about this and think im cowering at my desk because i have no legitmate reason to support mccain.

or you could just provide reasons instead of going "rofl i ignored your post n_u "


Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on November 01, 2008, 09:53:25 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 09:45:05 AM
guys just get over it. I like Mccain, and i dont like obama because my sister likes him and kinda because hes oh umm well maybe just a teensy bit black. The only reason i owuld like him is because people would consider me a racist if i didnt.


well that's too bad because you're fucking racist doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 09:57:42 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 09:45:05 AM
guys just get over it. I like Mccain, and i dont like obama because my sister likes him
I used to like this band but now this girl in my school likes it so I stopped listening.  giggle;

Quoteand kinda because hes oh umm well maybe just a teensy bit black.
he's also a teensy bit white. :O
But you're right, we can't let the dark ones into office, they might do something like have pigment in their skin. Only (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi) the White People (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLK) are respectable.  Them Damn blacks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler) are horrible, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin) horrible people (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon).  Damn blacksand their crime.
 
QuoteThe only reason i owuld like him is because people would consider me a racist if i didnt.

They might think im gay if I sit next to the gay kid in class xD
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: laskfn on November 01, 2008, 10:17:50 AM
JMV stop, you're really being an ass. you realize you're sitting at your computer arguing with two minors  (who cant vote) telling them they cant support someone because they dont have a reason. Its not worth it really.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 10:31:11 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 10:17:50 AM
Its not worth it really.
it's not costing me anything  bassir;

watch out for black people
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 10:45:42 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 10:17:50 AM
JMV stop, you're really being an ass.
You mean a logical individual who uses statistics, sources, and facts to back up a statement? If that's being an ass then economists, scientists, and those who value the truth over comforting misrepresentations are some of the biggest douchebags ever. YOU HEAR ME EINSTEIN? YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE. SAME TO YOU NEWTON. 
Quoteyou realize you're sitting at your computer arguing with two minors
Who should get a grasp on what politics are about.  You don't pick and support a politician because what they look like, their personality, who else likes them, and to be a rofl rebel xD. Democracy is about voting for the candidate who best represents your views and interests(none of which either of you supplied in support of McCain). It's not like high school where the class president has no real power over organizing a fund raiser to raise money for prom and the cool thing to do is vote for your friend or that kid who threw a dead frog in biology and it was hilarious.  Voting for someone with no actual reason can be a huge mistake. It can cost people their lives, jobs, health, and future.
Quote(who cant vote)
Thank Atheos.
 
Quotetelling them they cant support someone because they dont have a reason.
If you don't have a reason, other than keeping a black out of office and spiting your sister then don't vote.  doodhuh;

QuoteIts not worth it really.
Neither is screwing over a nation because of bigotry and spite.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on November 01, 2008, 10:53:51 AM
Why do Det and Wulphe even come to the serious discussion board if their logic is driven by "I'd vote for whoever my sister doesn't like lawl"
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: laskfn on November 01, 2008, 11:30:44 AM
Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 10:45:42 AM
You mean a logical individual who uses statistics, sources, and facts to back up a statement? If that's being an ass then economists, scientists, and those who value the truth over comforting misrepresentations are some of the biggest douchebags ever. YOU HEAR ME EINSTEIN? YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE. SAME TO YOU NEWTON. 


no, actually, im talking about a depressed 19 year old who does nothing other than sit at his computer all day because he doesnt go hang out with people due to his anxiety. The same person who was sent to a mental institution because hes stupid enough to try to overdose on depression and anxiety pills. this person arrived to this said institution just to write like a serial killer about a girl who doesnt love him at which point when he came back and did nothing but say snotty things about this girl. a person who does nothing but think hes cool because a pretty girl talked to him and called him a certain animal which he'll go to any length to be some form of it. this scrawny person who thinks hes incredible because he runs a forum. THAT PERSON

Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 10:45:42 AM
\  Who should get a grasp on what politics are about.  You don't pick and support a politician because what they look like, their personality, who else likes them, and to be a rofl rebel xD. Democracy is about voting for the candidate who best represents your views and interests(none of which either of you supplied in support of McCain). It's not like high school where the class president has no real power over organizing a fund raiser to raise money for prom and the cool thing to do is vote for your friend or that kid who threw a dead frog in biology and it was hilarious.  Voting for someone with no actual reason can be a huge mistake. It can cost people their lives, jobs, health, and future.


whats funny is that you seem to forget that image is everything these days. people are going to vote for obama because hes black. women might vote for mccain because he has a woman as a vp. Although you might overlook image because no one cares about yours ;]

Quote from: Kewn on November 01, 2008, 10:45:42 AM
  If you don't have a reason, other than keeping a black out of office and spiting your sister then don't vote. 


i do have a reason, can you name a good african american governmental leader we've had(in america). I mean the only one i have to go off of is Kwame kilpatrick who, um, got sent to jail i believe. so clearly im a racist because i dont want a black leader when i've already seen another black leader make some pretty bad decisions
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: guff on November 01, 2008, 11:38:10 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 11:30:44 AM
i do have a reason, can you name a good african american leader we've had. I mean the only one i have to go off of is Kwame kilpatrick who, um, got sent to jail i believe. so clearly im a racist because i dont want a black leader when i've already seen another black leader make some pretty bad decisions
clearly, kwame's scandal was the sole result of him being black
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: YPrrrr on November 01, 2008, 11:39:17 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 11:30:44 AM

whats funny is that you seem to forget that image is everything these days. people are going to vote for obama because hes black. women might vote for mccain because he has a woman as a vp. Although you might overlook image because no one cares about yours ;]

Where do you get your political information from? People?

i do have a reason, can you name a good african american governmental leader we've had(in america). I mean the only one i have to go off of is Kwame kilpatrick who, um, got sent to jail i believe. so clearly im a racist because i dont want a black leader when i've already seen another black leader make some pretty bad decisions
George Bush is white, don't vote for McCain
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Samus Aran on November 01, 2008, 11:44:31 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 11:30:44 AM
no, actually, im talking about a depressed 19 year old who does nothing other than sit at his computer all day because he doesnt go hang out with people due to his anxiety. The same person who was sent to a mental institution because hes stupid enough to try to overdose on depression and anxiety pills. this person arrived to this said institution just to write like a serial killer about a girl who doesnt love him at which point when he came back and did nothing but say snotty things about this girl. a person who does nothing but think hes cool because a pretty girl talked to him and called him a certain animal which he'll go to any length to be some form of it. this scrawny person who thinks hes incredible because he runs a forum. THAT PERSON


Oh wow. You're way out of line, Junior. Attacking someone's personal life in a political debate? Enjoy your ban, because that was some Grade A hurtful stuff and I'd be pissed if I was JMV.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 01, 2008, 11:45:00 AM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 11:30:44 AM
no, actually, im talking about a depressed 19 year old who does nothing other than sit at his computer all day because he doesnt go hang out with people due to his anxiety.
Because Medical Diagnosis of several disorders (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_phobia)  has so much to do with political arguments (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avoidant_personality_disorder)

QuoteThe same person who was sent to a mental institution because hes stupid enough to try to overdose on depression and anxiety pills.
I don't get what you mean by "try", either I did or I didn't.  If you are talking about suicide, no.  I knew the lethal dosage and I made sure I didn't go near it.  If you are talking about just taking 7 times the dosage, then it wasn't a try. I did it. And they're antidepressants. not 'depression and anxiety pills'.
Quotethis person arrived to this said institution just to write like a serial killer
yes it clearly sounded like a serial killer. I was like "omg I have a shrine of her ;)
Quoteabout a girl who doesnt love him
wait until det finds out she's heterosexual. :O
Quoteat which point when he came back and did nothing but say snotty things about this girl
oh wow, cool..
Quotea person who does nothing but think hes cool because a pretty girl talked to him and called him a certain animal which he'll go to any length to be some form of it.
clearly that "depression" from earlier and "thinking I'm cool" are somehow co-existent. now only if you understood the depth of my self esteem issues.

Quotethis scrawny person who thinks hes incredible because he runs a forum. THAT PERSON
And you're obese.  bassir;

Quotewhats funny is that you seem to forget that image is everything these days.
So that makes it right?
Everyone else is doing it so why don't I?

Quotepeople are going to vote for obama because hes black. women might vote for mccain because he has a woman as a vp.
And your vote should be affected because of that?
QuoteAlthough you might overlook image because no one cares about yours ;]
What? Although I'm annoyed with Det, I don't think she's stupid.  However you're being a complete dumbass.

Quotei do have a reason, can you name a good african american leader we've had.
You're a fucking retard. Get the hell out of Serious Discussion.  Racism has no place in politics. If you're talking about "leaders" , MLK was one of the greatest Americans to live.  If you're talking about leaders in a political sense. Thurgood Marshall.  We haven't had many black leaders, so it's kind of hard to pick one.
QuoteI mean the only one i have to go off of is Kwame kilpatrick who, um, got sent to jail i believe. so clearly im a racist because i dont want a black leader when i've already seen another black leader make some pretty bad decisions
Because Ted Haggard, Eliot Spitzer, Bob Packwood, Ted Stevens, Richard Nixon, and plenty of other white politicians had their problems.


But yeah, go ahead and base your attacks on my personal problems and racism.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 01, 2008, 09:01:57 PM
nice job wulphe goonish

also det about obama's little slip-up
[spoiler][youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mBi7d6e5KI[/youtube][/spoiler]

holy shits mccain called us all prisoners he's an idiot and doesn't deserve to be president :(

Also, I was unaware that we had any racists here.
dark skin=automatic idiot befuddlement
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Ezloﺕ on November 02, 2008, 07:44:34 AM
is det banned too please tell me she was banned as well

anyway, how close do you think this election would be
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on November 02, 2008, 08:20:26 AM
Quote from: Detonator on November 01, 2008, 07:22:55 AM
or that the phrase '57 states' shouldn't even cross his mind in the first place.

oh yes, sure, let's have a shitty public speaker to represent and be president of our country. he probably won't be talking to any foreign countries or anything, and when he says '57 states' again, that won't embarrass us one bit. ^_________^
Please, please tell me you don't like Bush.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on November 02, 2008, 01:18:01 PM
Quote from: Wulphe on November 01, 2008, 11:30:44 AM
no, actually, im talking about a depressed 19 year old who does nothing other than sit at his computer all day because he doesnt go hang out with people due to his anxiety. The same person who was sent to a mental institution because hes stupid enough to try to overdose on depression and anxiety pills. this person arrived to this said institution just to write like a serial killer about a girl who doesnt love him at which point when he came back and did nothing but say snotty things about this girl. a person who does nothing but think hes cool because a pretty girl talked to him and called him a certain animal which he'll go to any length to be some form of it. this scrawny person who thinks hes incredible because he runs a forum. THAT PERSON

whats funny is that you seem to forget that image is everything these days. people are going to vote for obama because hes black. women might vote for mccain because he has a woman as a vp. Although you might overlook image because no one cares about yours ;]

i do have a reason, can you name a good african american governmental leader we've had(in america). I mean the only one i have to go off of is Kwame kilpatrick who, um, got sent to jail i believe. so clearly im a racist because i dont want a black leader when i've already seen another black leader make some pretty bad decisions
white pride world wide
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Det in F♯ Major on November 02, 2008, 02:31:34 PM
i don't know what tyler's talking about, kwame kilpatrick is the best thing that happened to this city >:(
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 02, 2008, 05:40:14 PM
Quote from: joeinc on November 02, 2008, 01:18:01 PM
white pride world wide
we must not oppose the aryan race. it shall rule the thousand year reich. Reichdood;

wait until he learns about the punic wars and the mixing of the north africans and the southern party of italy and sicily. i guess that makes det and i bad people since we're from that part of italy and all black, even half and less are horrible horrible monsters who cannot be trusted.
giggle;


ps i have a black cousin fuck you ;-;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on November 02, 2008, 07:34:51 PM
Quote from: Kewn on November 02, 2008, 05:40:14 PM
we must not oppose the aryan race. it shall rule the thousand year reich. Reichdood;

wait until he learns about the punic wars and the mixing of the north africans and the southern party of italy and sicily. i guess that makes det and i bad people since we're from that part of italy and all black, even half and less are horrible horrible monsters who cannot be trusted.
giggle;


ps i have a black cousin fuck you ;-;
i was joking bro
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 02, 2008, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: joeinc on November 02, 2008, 07:34:51 PM
i was joking bro
i wasn't saying fuck you to you  giggle;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on November 02, 2008, 07:40:52 PM
Quote from: Kewn on November 02, 2008, 07:39:57 PM
i wasn't saying fuck you to you  giggle;
oh ok bro
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 03, 2008, 09:32:14 PM
DEAR PEOPLE WHO WON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF HIS LACK OF EXPERIENCE?

[URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln]DOES THIS MEAN YOU WOULDN'T VOTE FOR THIS MAN?[/URL]
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on November 03, 2008, 10:00:30 PM
Quote from: Kewn on November 03, 2008, 09:32:14 PM
DEAR PEOPLE WHO WON'T VOTE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE OF HIS LACK OF EXPERIENCE?

[URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln]DOES THIS MEAN YOU WOULDN'T VOTE FOR THIS MAN?[/URL]
I bet Det wouldn't vote for no nigger lover.
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Nyerp on November 04, 2008, 05:26:08 AM
Quote from: Houdini on November 03, 2008, 10:00:30 PM
I bet Det wouldn't vote for no nigger lover.


Lincoln wasn't necessarily an abolitionist. doodthing;
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Houdini on November 04, 2008, 07:45:41 PM
Quote from: he on November 04, 2008, 05:26:08 AM
Lincoln wasn't necessarily an abolitionist. doodthing;
he still passed that emancipatin proclamation, that might count for something
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: j o e i n c on November 04, 2008, 08:11:31 PM
RON PAUL WINS UNEXPECTEDLY, WINS 89% OF THE VOTE, TURN ON CNN
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Daddy on November 04, 2008, 08:16:37 PM
FUCK YEAH OBAMA
Title: Re: 2008 Election Thread
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on November 04, 2008, 08:30:15 PM
WOOO OBAMA