May 25, 2019, 06:40:51 PM

1,536,628 Posts in 46,085 Topics by 1,108 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


PC BENCHMARX THREAD

Started by Magyarorszag, August 18, 2018, 07:37:28 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Magyarorszag

Quote from: Snowy on October 31, 2018, 07:48:29 PMyeah I plan on running it tomorrow after setting it back to stock. do you know if gen 1 ryzen have XFR?

it does

https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/sense-mi

Snowy

Quote from: Magyarorszag on November 01, 2018, 06:21:00 PM
Quote from: Snowy on October 31, 2018, 07:48:29 PMyeah I plan on running it tomorrow after setting it back to stock. do you know if gen 1 ryzen have XFR?

it does

https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/sense-mi
hmmmm that could be it. I know I can get all cores at 4ghz but I know with xfr I've seen some benchmarks with their peak speed being 4.5-5ghz.
Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Magyarorszag

a 4.5-5ghz ryzen 1 chip would be like one in a billion lol

Snowy

Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Magyarorszag

wowzers

that's probably the best-performing ryzen 1 chip in the world lol

most of them struggle to achieve even 4.0ghz

Snowy

I saw one last week that had a peak speed of 5.05ghz, and I'm going to assume they were using a chiller or LN2.

god i wish i could hit those speeds
Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Magyarorszag

I'm praying dearly that with Ryzen 3 those frequencies will be a little closer to reality for the average chip. cry;

Snowy

What does Zen+ peak at now? 4.4? I could see the next Zen series hitting 4.6 or so.
Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Magyarorszag

4.4ghz is about as high as zen+ gets, yes

zen 2 is being manufactured by tsmc though, and their process is ostensibly superior to globalfoundries'

if that fact plus the node shrink allow for frequencies closer to 5ghz, it would massively erode the advantage intel maintains over amd presently

5ghz might be a little optimistic though lol but here's hoping

Magyarorszag

November 23, 2018, 11:57:33 AM #24 Last Edit: November 23, 2018, 12:07:47 PM by Magyarorszag
On a related note, a few days ago I managed to circumvent Intel's artificially imposed overclocking restrictions and boost my i5 6500 to a very stable ~4.1ghz.

https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/12307676

QuoteUserBenchmarks: Game 79%, Desk 69%, Work 51%
CPU: Intel Core i5-6500 - 94.6%
GPU: AMD R9 Fury - 82.2%
SSD: PNY CS1311 240GB - 86.7%
HDD: Toshiba X300 5TB - 109.4%
RAM: Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB - 106.8%
MBD: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5

From an average bench of ~70% to 94.6%. Oh my goodness. goowan

that's a free a 25% performance boost, which makes it about equal to the 7700k and puts it ahead of the 2600x, which is just nuts for a 2015-era i5

in put me in the top 1% of 6500 benchmarks lol

https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Intel-Core-i5-6500/Rating/3513

and that's with intel's standard cooler, which is terrible

in light of this, i yesterday ordered a 212 evo which should hopefully allow me to clock it even higher, apparently some 6500s can get as high as 4.4ghz which would be AWESOME

But it's simply absurd that Intel deliberately sabotages is own products so massively just to make their most expensive processors seem more valuable. Is it really necessary to handicap a fine chip by as much as 25%+ just to create more pricing tiers? SocksDood;

it's total bullsh@ that beyond skylake they've made overclocking non-Ks completely impossible and that there are so many cpus forced to perform well below their potential

it actually costs them money to develop chipsets and software that strictly forbid overclocking and they're only doing that out of pettiness and spite

jesus fuck; incel's business practices lol

Snowy

You did that with the stock cooler??? Are you trying to burn your house down? lmao
Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Magyarorszag

Quote from: Snowy on November 23, 2018, 06:45:09 PMYou did that with the stock cooler??? Are you trying to burn your house down? lmao

What's truly amazing is that even at that speed, even with that awful cooler, it's still well below 80C 99% of the time. sillydood;

but yeah that's why i bought the 212 evo, the stock cooler is definitely inadequate and i don't want to accidentally create a bomb lol

Snowy

what was your avg temp with that oc on a stock cooler?
Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Magyarorszag

Quote from: Snowy on November 25, 2018, 05:58:57 AMwhat was your avg temp with that oc on a stock cooler?



it averages around 54C, but during stressful benchmarks (one of which i had just run to answer this question, so really the average is lower than 54) it can breach the 80 mark, as you can see, which is why i need a new cooler lol

Speaking of which, I'm seriously considering returning the 212 Evo ($20) and getting one of those unsightly cream-brown Noctuas ($60) instead. smithicide;

Snowy

For $60 just get a Corsair H60. Little AIO water cooler that'll solve all heat management problems. On stock it'll run extremely low.
Quote from: Samus Aran on November 05, 2009, 12:50:30 PMlast night i bludgeoned a bull moose to death with my cock

Go Up