Double standards

[Commander Fuckass]

Lists ones you hate


If a athiest speak out again christianity, they are wrong but if a christian tries to convent an athiest they are in the right.

[ncba93ivyase]

men can and are shamed for frequently or never having sex

there's an entire political movement built around not doing the same to women

[silvertone]

I dont like the double standards when it comes to shoes... like bitch i aint in europe

[6M69I69B9]

I dont like the double standards when it comes to shoes... like bitch i aint in europe

dying

[PLEASEHELP1991]

a atheist or an atheist

[6M69I69B9]

a atheist or an atheist

a theist

[YPrrrr]

wat

how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad

Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill

Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least

[Snowy]

ypr can make containment threads but I can't

[ncba93ivyase]

wat

how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad

Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill

Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least

I'm pretty sure the last one applies in most states

I don't get it either

[6M69I69B9]

wat

how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad

Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill

Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least

i think the logic is th@ a woman who's keeping a baby intends for it to grow up as a person, probably.  and the diff. betwn th@ is a woman doing it by a more "acceptable" mean like umm abortion

i mean i do see the 2x standard but...ummm yea..

[YPrrrr]

wat

how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad

Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill

Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least

i think the logic is th@ a woman who's keeping a baby intends for it to grow up as a person, probably.  and the diff. betwn th@ is a woman doing it by a more "acceptable" mean like umm abortion

i mean i do see the 2x standard but...ummm yea..

making a law conditional upon an individual's interpretation is kind of ridiculous though

[PLEASEHELP1991]

Did you know that's actually a federal act too?

[YPrrrr]

Did you know that's actually a federal act too?

well that's even more strange. They seem to be in direct conflict

[PLEASEHELP1991]

Did you know that's actually a federal act too?

well that's even more strange. They seem to be in direct conflict

well the federal act only applies to crimes in federal jurisdiction like terrorism

[Cookie]

wat

how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad

Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill

Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least

all of this, ALL OF THIS