Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?

[silvertone]

In other words, who is the objective winner in your subjective...who scored the more ethical, war crime justice, slayer of tyranny etc points?
is it
Big Bad Bin Ladin and his Building Smashing Cronies

or

Return of the Bush and his Million Man Muslim Mashin' Marines?
.

Or will it be the etherical dark horse?

[ME##]

History is written by the white man.  So ultimately, George 'Big Tex' Bush. 

[snoorkel]

Well Socialist Obama obviously.

[Clara Listensprechen]

Despite who tries to write history, archaeologists always PWN historians. 

[ME##]

Despite who tries to write history, archaeologists always PWN historians. 

yeah2` bad archaeologists suck

[silvertone]

Well Socialist Obama obviously.

Socialism is the oxygen of ether.

[strongbad]

>read post title
>read poster username
>judge thread without clicking on it
>judgement confirmed upon clicking

[silvertone]

>read post title
>read poster username
>judge thread without clicking on it
>judgement confirmed upon clicking

>reads l'epic strong bad post
>Poof post
> ?? ? /
>profit

[strongbad]

;-;

[silvertone]

For real though, people have fallen back in love with George Bush already. They like his paintings they defend his tax cuts and he is a 'cool old man that i would like to have a beer with.' He is just a dumb ole man,  he is going to be the conservative jimmy carter.


On the other side, Bin Ladin is very rock n roll. He will be like middle eastern Mao. 20 years from now, airhead anarchists will watch his tapes while reading the Little Read Book.

[Clara Listensprechen]

Despite who tries to write history, archaeologists always PWN historians. 

yeah2` bad archaeologists suck

All of those are currently working for The History Channel.  The good ones are doing real archaeology, and they still PWN historians.

[Hiro]

jimmy carter is the fucking bomb