ask guff

[guff]

I'm so sorry, I won't do it again.

well actually i was pretty unsure about my answer because i'm not that into physics and have not dealt with antimatter/matter reactions and stuff so my hope was that if i was wrong it would look as if i just was being silly and came up with something nonsensical

[Gladjaframpf]

well actually i was pretty unsure about my answer because i'm not that into physics and have not dealt with antimatter/matter reactions and stuff so my hope was that if i was wrong it would look as if i just was being silly and came up with something nonsensical

Yeah, I'm not actually sure if that answer is 100% accurate either. I think in higher energy collisions some particles might be produced as well as energy or something.

[guff]

Yeah, I'm not actually sure if that answer is 100% accurate either. I think in higher energy collisions some particles might be produced as well as energy or something.

well i think wikipedia said that the entire mass is converted to energy but i dunno antimatter is silly

[YPrrrr]

What is JMV's fraud?

[Gladjaframpf]

well i think wikipedia said that the entire mass is converted to energy but i dunno antimatter is silly

The wiki article on annihilation says this:
"During a low-energy annihilation, photon production is favored, since these particles have no mass. However, high-energy particle colliders produce annihilations where a wide variety of exotic heavy particles are created."

So I guess most of the time you do just get pure energy. It seems odd to me that you would get only photons and not some sort of antiphoton, but photons don't have a antiparticle so I guess not.

[guff]

What is JMV's fraud?

He knows. 

The wiki article on annihilation says this:
"During a low-energy annihilation, photon production is favored, since these particles have no mass. However, high-energy particle colliders produce annihilations where a wide variety of exotic heavy particles are created."

So I guess most of the time you do just get pure energy. It seems odd to me that you would get only photons and not some sort of antiphoton, but photons don't have a antiparticle so I guess not.

aaaaah too much sciences

what the hell would an antiphoton be like oh god i'm so confused
also why the hell does antimatters and matters being angry at each other produce photangs

[Daddy]

will i ever get married

[Gladjaframpf]

aaaaah too much sciences

what the hell would an antiphoton be like oh god i'm so confused

I'm pretty sure they don't exist. Either photons are their own antiparticles or they don't have one at all, I can't remember which.

Although if they were their own antiparticle they would probably annihilate with each other which doesn't happen so I guess they must just not have one.

also why the hell does antimatters and matters being angry at each other produce photangs

I'm not actually sure why annihilation happens but I think the process gives the resultant particles lots of kinetic energy so the particles have to be light for momentum to be conserved and photons are good for that because they're massless. So that's why when the original matter and antimatter have high velocity heavier particles can result because there is more initial momentum and so the final momentum can be greater as well.

But I don't have any formal education in particle physics and there's a good chance I'm just making things up at this point so you probably shouldn't listen to me.

[guff]

...and there's a good chance I'm just making things up at this point so you probably shouldn't listen to me.

Don't worry, I just skipped to the end anyways.

[6M69I69B9]

Solve by using the quadratic Formula : -16x^2-9x+24 = 0

Plug in the number you get from using the Quadratic Formula. Then do an "X and Y table".

Then graph your solutions.

What's the Vertex?
What's the Axis?
Does it go up or down?
Which ones are x-intercept solutions?

[guff]

Solve by using the quadratic Formula : -16x^2-9x+24 = 0

Plug in the number you get from using the Quadratic Formula. Then do an "X and Y table".

Then graph your solutions.

What's the Vertex?
What's the Axis?
Does it go up or down?
Which ones are x-intercept solutions?

sorry i failed algebra i

[[REDACTED]]

sorry i failed algebra i

guys i need help with algebra iii
how do i solve this
x+1=0

[The Hand That Fisted Everyone]

guys i need help with algebra iii
how do i solve this
x+1=0

x = -1

[Squirtlejazz]

x = -1

Wait, how do you do that?

[Garahe]

Wait, how do you do that?

haha ur dum

I'll explain it. So the expression is x+1=0. The more than obvious way to get to 0 by addition is if your variable is a negative number. So it has to be a negative because you're adding and getting zero. Basically, -1+1 is like 1-1. They both equal zero, they just have different signs and operations.