If you could only get two 360 games

[ncba93ivyase]

Oh boy I'm 11 years old and 10 dollars a hueg sum of money 

Anyone that isn't a complete idiot, even those that have a steady job and fair income, can agree that games are expensive and every dollar saved is a big deal that can go to more games or more important things (if there is anything).

ok, doesn't change the fact that the 360 still has good games. All you did was provide an alternative to the 360. In no way did you show that it has bad games. Are you messing with me or are you seriously just that dumb?

All of its good games are inferior versions of PC games.

[Sam]

Viva Pinata and, assuming banjo kazooie 3 isn't out yet, another viva pinata.

[Geno]

Lawlz, and everyone who says 360 has shit games.

Shut the fuck up.

God damn seriously.

[LINK2K9]

Lawlz, and everyone who says 360 has shit games.

Shut the fuck up.

God damn seriously.

If the 360 has shit games then the PS3 has shit games because nearly all of the good games are multiplatform.

Except Crackdown. I don't care what the fuck any of you say, it kicks fucking ass.

[The artist formally known]

Anyone that isn't a complete idiot, even those that have a steady job and fair income, can agree that games are expensive and every dollar saved is a big deal that can go to more games or more important things (if there is anything).

Video games are pretty inexpensive buy them the way I do. Though the systems aren't cheap

[ncba93ivyase]

If the 360 has shit games then the PS3 has shit games because nearly all of the good games are multiplatform.

Except Crackdown. I don't care what the fuck any of you say, it kicks fucking ass.

No, the PS3 actually has exclusives. They may or may not be good, but they're still exclusives.

[LINK2K9]

No, the PS3 actually has exclusives. They may or may not be good, but they're still exclusives.

I never said the PS3 didn't have exclusives. 

I said the best games on both platforms are multiplats.

[strongbad]

I'd have to go with Halo3 (stfu) and orange box (stfu pc fags)

[Hiro]

B-Sides, some people can't afford a nice PC.

[Hermione Granger]

halo 3

and some other game

[ME##]

Anyone that isn't a complete idiot, even those that have a steady job and fair income, can agree that games are expensive and every dollar saved is a big deal that can go to more games or more important things (if there is anything)

Yes.


Also, I've always been  befuddled at the cost of Xbox 360 games, they're manufactured on the same type of discs that PC games are so why are they $10 more expensive?  And don't give me that 'development costs more' bullshit, if this was the case the PC version would be the exact same price.

The price increase from PlayStation 2 games to PlayStation 3 games is at least some what justified by the fact that Sony is using a next generation disc format, but I doubt that the extra cost of producing game on BD-ROMs as opposed to DVD-ROMs is any wear close to that amount, maybe $5 more, but certainly not $10.

[ncba93ivyase]

The price increase from PlayStation 2 games to PlayStation 3 games is at least some what justified by the fact that Sony is using a next generation disc format, but I doubt that the extra cost of producing game on BD-ROMs as opposed to DVD-ROMs is any wear close to that amount, maybe $5 more, but certainly not $10.

It would cost no more than the jump from CDs to DVDs.

The market is expanding, so there's no justification in rising prices. In the 90s, games often exceeded $60 because it was such a limited market and they were so hard to manufacture. Now with hundred of millions of customers and huge development companies out the ass, there's no reason for them to really exceed $50 or even $40.

[Geno]

I remember a time when Pokemon Stadium 2 cost 70$

[mariofreak]

umm rock band and UT3 when it comes out

[LINK2K9]

Yes.


Also, I've always been  befuddled at the cost of Xbox 360 games, they're manufactured on the same type of discs that PC games are so why are they $10 more expensive?  And don't give me that 'development costs more' bullshit, if this was the case the PC version would be the exact same price.

The price increase from PlayStation 2 games to PlayStation 3 games is at least some what justified by the fact that Sony is using a next generation disc format, but I doubt that the extra cost of producing game on BD-ROMs as opposed to DVD-ROMs is any wear close to that amount, maybe $5 more, but certainly not $10.

Why the $10 increase?

Licensing and all that, but I doubt that's the reason for an extra $10. The reason is probably because they can. Why not extra $10 on a game? Just look at Microsoft, originally promised $50 for 1st party titles. Why the increase a year after launch? Because they can and they'll still have people buy it.