Poll
Question:
asnwer
Option 1: MacBook
Option 2: iMac
WHAT ARE THE PROS AND CONS OF EACH?
The Specs are the same, honestly.
The Macbooks a hell of a lot cooler and sleeker.
The iMac has a huge screen
The MacBook has an integrated graphics card.
Buy a Macbook for our journey.
iMac is cheaper and more powerful, and actually has a graphics card.
Macbook's only advantage is the portability.
iMac, definitely, unless you must have a laptop. Much bigger screen (big plus for me), much better graphics, much bigger hard drive.
Quote from: Lawlz on July 26, 2007, 10:01:26 PM
iMac is cheaper and more powerful, and actually has a graphics card.
Macbook's only advantage is the portability.
iMac is cheaper?
Yea, if you get the shitty one.
Quote from: Snorkel on July 26, 2007, 10:01:42 PM
iMac, definitely, unless you must have a laptop. Much bigger screen (big plus for me), much better graphics, much bigger hard drive.
Much bigger hard drive?
Not so much.
Quote from: Title on July 26, 2007, 10:07:52 PM
Much bigger hard drive?
Not so much.
It has options for up to 750gb, but yeah, I was thinking of when you could only put 100gb HDD's in MacBooks when I bought mine.
Quote from: Title on July 26, 2007, 10:07:27 PM
iMac is cheaper?
Yea, if you get the shitty one.
Actually, the second (17" with 2.0GHz) iMac is $1,099 with a student discount. spam;
my macbook is my baaaaby.
i have nightmarees about it getting broken/stolen/etc.
unhealthy, i know, but it's always there for me. caterpie;
unlike most everyone else i know gonk;
shutup, i know i'm pathetic.
I voted for iMac.
Cuz of Zack's nonexistant 22'' one. navi;
Quote from: Bassir on July 26, 2007, 10:17:05 PM
Actually, the second (17" with 2.0GHz) iMac is $1,099 with a student discount. spam;
As is the low-end MacBook,my friend.
Quote from: Snorkel on July 26, 2007, 10:11:01 PM
It has options for up to 750gb, but yeah, I was thinking of when you could only put 100gb HDD's in MacBooks when I bought mine.
Are you running a fucking business? I have a 160 gig HDD.
Quote from: Bassir on July 26, 2007, 09:54:26 PM
WHAT ARE THE PROS AND CONS OF EACH?
You tell me, nerd.
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 05:23:10 AM
As is the low-end MacBook,my friend.
13"? 80GB? How will I enjoy Linux with only 80GB?
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 07:53:41 AM
13"? 80GB? How will I enjoy Linux with only 80GB?
THEN DON'T GET THE FUCKING 80 GIG
160 GIG IS MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR LINUX
WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU EVEN RUNNING LINUX ON A MAC
LINUX IS LIKE MAC OS X'S RETARDED BROTHER
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 01:30:06 PM
LINUX IS LIKE MAC OS X'S RETARDED BROTHER
even though osx inherits quite a bit of open source software that one would often see in linux distributions and whatnot
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:32:47 PM
even though osx inherits quite a bit of open source software that one would often see in linux distributions and whatnot
also leopard has workspaces now
lol linux
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:32:47 PM
even though osx inherits quite a bit of open source software that one would often see in linux distributions and whatnot
doesnt make it linux
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:32:47 PM
even though osx inherits quite a bit of open source software that one would often see in linux distributions and whatnot
Don't fuck with me, I'm not in the mood.
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2007, 01:33:38 PM
doesnt make it linux
okay cool
give us back the open source components then
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 01:33:48 PM
Don't fuck with me, I'm not in the mood.
YEAH WELL DON'T FUCK WITH ME EITHER
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 01:33:23 PM
also leopard has workspaces now
lol linux
Leopard's fucking awesome.
(http://images.apple.com/macosx/leopard/features/images/desktop_hero20070611.png)
Jesus christ that Dock is sexy.
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:35:10 PM
okay cool
give us back the open source components thenYEAH WELL DON'T FUCK WITH ME EITHER
i dint emo;
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 01:37:22 PM
i dint emo;
Seriously, I'm not in the mood to have you fuck with me.
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:35:10 PM
okay cool
give us back the open source components then
only if you return it to bell labs
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:38:29 PM
Seriously, I'm not in the mood to have you fuck with me.
i dint dont turn this around on me bitch emo;
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2007, 01:40:27 PM
only if you return it to bell labs
how i return something that's not theirs psyduck;
Quote from: Commodore Guff on July 27, 2007, 01:41:57 PM
how i return something that's not theirs psyduck;
because hes ur dad |:
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 01:36:57 PM
Time Machine stolen from Vista, workspaces stolen from Linux, dock style stolen from Vista too.
still awesome <3
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 01:52:11 PM
Time Machine stolen from Vista, workspaces stolen from Linux, dock style stolen from Vista too.
still awesome <3
Dock stolen from something that doesn't exist? The dock is slanted, wow. Vista doesn't even have one. psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2007, 01:56:13 PM
Dock stolen from something that doesn't exist? The dock is slanted, wow. Vista doesn't even have one. psyduck;
MICROSOFT CREATED GLASS.
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 01:58:19 PM
MICROSOFT CREATED GLASS.
It really looks nothing like Vista's nasty glass. Just some little wavy shadow thing. psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2007, 02:02:14 PM
It really looks nothing like Vista's nasty glass. Just some little wavy shadow thing. psyduck;
Leopard's transparent menubar, glassy dock, and vista wallpaper was very disappointing. Especially since the Steve made cracks at Vista during the keynote.
But I guess cover-flow and all those other features make up for it.
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 02:04:08 PM
Leopard's transparent menubar, glassy dock, and vista wallpaper was very disappointing. Especially since the Steve made cracks at Vista during the keynote.
But I guess cover-flow and all those other features make up for it.
How is that dock not fucking awesome? It doesn't look like vista, because Vista doesn't even have a dock or a top bar. educate;
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 02:04:08 PM
Leopard's transparent menubar, glassy dock, and vista wallpaper was very disappointing. Especially since the Steve made cracks at Vista during the keynote.
But I guess cover-flow and all those other features make up for it.
I can sort of understand you seeing a resemblance in the menubar, but not the dock. It all looks more like clear plastic than glass, and OS X has been taking advantage of transparency for a long time. psyduck;
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 02:09:56 PM
How is that dock not fucking awesome? It doesn't look like vista, because Vista doesn't even have a dock or a menu bar. educate;
No, it's not. The default Leopard desktop kinda lost its agua-feeling--which I really liked.
Quote from: Bassir on July 27, 2007, 02:12:27 PM
No, it's not. The default Leopard desktop kinda lost its agua-feeling--which I really liked.
How the fuck did it lose the aqua feeling? Most people don't keep the aqua background for more than a day, if that's what you're referring to.
Quote from: Title on July 27, 2007, 02:21:33 PM
How the fuck did it lose the aqua feeling? Most people don't keep the aqua background for more than a day, if that's what you're referring to.
Besides, aqua was lost a long time ago when brushed metal moved in. psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on July 27, 2007, 02:25:47 PM
Besides, aqua was lost a long time ago when brushed metal moved in. psyduck;
I think leopard has a new theme.
It's called "kickass"