Lists ones you hate
If a athiest speak out again christianity, they are wrong but if a christian tries to convent an athiest they are in the right.
men can and are shamed for frequently or never having sex
there's an entire political movement built around not doing the same to women
I dont like the double standards when it comes to shoes... like bitch i aint in europe
Quote from: cybermancer on April 17, 2014, 03:34:28 PM
I dont like the double standards when it comes to shoes... like bitch i aint in europe
dying
a atheist or an atheist
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
ypr can make containment threads but I can't
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:15:47 AM
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
I'm pretty sure the last one applies in most states
I don't get it either
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:15:47 AM
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
i think the logic is th@ a woman who's keeping a baby intends for it to grow up as a person, probably. and the diff. betwn th@ is a woman doing it by a more "acceptable" mean like umm abortion
i mean i do see the 2x standard but...ummm yea..
Quote from: TLL7-MIB-7LLT on April 18, 2014, 09:01:02 AM
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:15:47 AM
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
i think the logic is th@ a woman who's keeping a baby intends for it to grow up as a person, probably. and the diff. betwn th@ is a woman doing it by a more "acceptable" mean like umm abortion
i mean i do see the 2x standard but...ummm yea..
making a law conditional upon an individual's interpretation is kind of ridiculous though
Did you know that's actually a federal act too?
Quote from: PLEASEHELP1991 on April 18, 2014, 10:07:57 AM
Did you know that's actually a federal act too?
well that's even more strange. They seem to be in direct conflict
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:56:21 PM
Quote from: PLEASEHELP1991 on April 18, 2014, 10:07:57 AM
Did you know that's actually a federal act too?
well that's even more strange. They seem to be in direct conflict
well the federal act only applies to crimes in federal jurisdiction like terrorism
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:15:47 AM
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
all of this, ALL OF THIS
Quote from: TLL7-MIB-7LLT on April 18, 2014, 09:01:02 AM
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:15:47 AM
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
i think the logic is th@ a woman who's keeping a baby intends for it to grow up as a person, probably. and the diff. betwn th@ is a woman doing it by a more "acceptable" mean like umm abortion
i mean i do see the 2x standard but...ummm yea..
if a someone causes sufficient harm to a man's testicles that he has to get them removed, then they should also be considered murderers
Quote from: ncba93ivyase on April 18, 2014, 06:03:04 PM
Quote from: TLL7-MIB-7LLT on April 18, 2014, 09:01:02 AM
Quote from: YPR Classic on April 18, 2014, 12:15:47 AM
wat
how about the athiests that bitch about theists (more specifically christians) pressing their beliefs/converting and then feel the need to try to convince theists why there is no god or why religion is bad
Also, I've noticed a great many feminists and other human rights activists who fight for "equality" yet will tell a male to "be a man" or "grow a pair" or "don't be a girl" or something related as if there is a specific role men need to fulfill
Furthermore, bullshit such as this law in Wisconsin: "The killing of an "unborn child" at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle." Which means anyone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with a double homicide. Yet if the mother decides to kill that same unborn child, it is completely legal. I mean what. It makes no sense. The fetus is a person or it isn't it can't go both ways. Make it consistent at least
i think the logic is th@ a woman who's keeping a baby intends for it to grow up as a person, probably. and the diff. betwn th@ is a woman doing it by a more "acceptable" mean like umm abortion
i mean i do see the 2x standard but...ummm yea..
if a someone causes sufficient harm to a man's testicles that he has to get them removed, then they should also be considered murderers
ooooh u wanna box?
well a fetus is like...ummm has gone through signifancy progress than umm semen if ur reffering to the removal of testes like th@
w8 you know what i got a better way of setting this
f u
[spoiler]jk[/spoiler]
[spoiler]kinda[/spoiler]
but tbh, im just trying to make logic of what ypr just brought up to make sense of it since it is contra icktory
u sure seem like ur thirsty for blood
#growling #ethermysocksoff
i'm not really making it a moral argument or an issue of how developed the entity needs to be, but the laws really are contradictory. if you can legally abort it, then it is not legally recognized as a human. if involuntarily killing it qualifies as murder, then that means abortion is also murder.
saying "what if she wants it" should not have any effect on this since wanting something doesn't make it human. e.g., killing a dog or intentionally breaking someone's lamp. both are illegal, but neither are ever treated as murder. sure, they aren't humans, but the law also doesn't define a fetus/embryo as human except in this special circumstance
if killing the unborn is selectively murder, then so is forcibly castrating someone.
Quote from: ncba93ivyase on April 18, 2014, 08:30:14 PM
i'm not really making it a moral argument or an issue of how developed the entity needs to be, but the laws really are contradictory. if you can legally abort it, then it is not legally recognized as a human. if involuntarily killing it qualifies as murder, then that means abortion is also murder.
saying "what if she wants it" should not have any effect on this since wanting something doesn't make it human. e.g., killing a dog or intentionally breaking someone's lamp. both are illegal, but neither are ever treated as murder. sure, they aren't humans, but the law also doesn't define a fetus/embryo as human except in this special circumstance
if killing the unborn is selectively murder, then so is forcibly castrating someone.
sometimes i get careful where i step b/c i think i am going to ruin life
art of depreciation
an item
a something that is not coherent enough to exist or 2be considered something
a walk with no steps
a "dumb" thing
but yeah anyway i see ur point
tbh i do think like th@ regardless of what i've mentioned. but yeah ummm contradictory stuff ypr mentioned lol wow
If MIB posts another "#" I will kill an animal.
Quote from: Boogus Epirus Aurelius on April 18, 2014, 11:43:25 PM
If MIB posts another "#" I will kill an animal.
th@ isn't nice #_#
Quote from: JMV290 on April 19, 2014, 07:11:56 AM
Quote from: Boogus Epirus Aurelius on April 18, 2014, 11:43:25 PM
If MIB posts another "#" I will kill an animal.
all those POOR animals
#why #killingisbad #ignorefunction #getagrip #griponmydick
Quote from: Snowy on April 19, 2014, 12:22:55 AM
Quote from: Boogus Epirus Aurelius on April 18, 2014, 11:43:25 PM
If MIB posts another "#" I will kill an animal.
th@ isn't nice #_#
yeah like this is not nice at all. who the hell do these ppl think they are omg
#toKillaMockingbird