Text only | Text with Images

Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: on December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM

Poll
Question: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians (AKA garbagemen)?
Option 1: George Bush. America's Hometown hero votes: 2
Option 2: The Modern Hashashin. Bin Ladin votes: 1
Option 3: Etherical Wave Vortexes. The New Age Gender votes: 9
Title: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: silvertone on March 07, 2014, 02:16:37 PM
In other words, who is the objective winner in your subjective...who scored the more ethical, war crime justice, slayer of tyranny etc points?
is it
Big Bad Bin Ladin and his Building Smashing Cronies

or

Return of the Bush and his Million Man Muslim Mashin' Marines?
.

Or will it be the etherical dark horse?
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: ME## on March 07, 2014, 02:27:38 PM
History is written by the white man.  So ultimately, George 'Big Tex' Bush. 
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: snoorkel on March 07, 2014, 02:56:23 PM
Well Socialist Obama obviously.
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: Clara Listensprechen on March 08, 2014, 12:40:34 PM
Despite who tries to write history, archaeologists always PWN historians.  akudood;
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: ME## on March 08, 2014, 01:34:59 PM
Quote from: Clara Listensprechen on March 08, 2014, 12:40:34 PM
Despite who tries to write history, archaeologists always PWN historians.  akudood;
yeah2` bad archaeologists suck
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: silvertone on March 08, 2014, 02:10:04 PM
Quote from: infinite luxury on March 07, 2014, 02:56:23 PM
Well Socialist Obama obviously.
Socialism is the oxygen of ether.
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: strongbad on March 10, 2014, 06:03:25 PM
>read post title
>read poster username
>judge thread without clicking on it
>judgement confirmed upon clicking
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: silvertone on March 10, 2014, 08:48:31 PM
Quote from: udderfailure on March 10, 2014, 06:03:25 PM
>read post title
>read poster username
>judge thread without clicking on it
>judgement confirmed upon clicking


>reads l'epic strong bad post
>Poof post
> ?? ? /
>profit
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: strongbad on March 10, 2014, 10:59:32 PM
;-;
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: silvertone on March 11, 2014, 12:50:39 PM
For real though, people have fallen back in love with George Bush already. They like his paintings they defend his tax cuts and he is a 'cool old man that i would like to have a beer with.' He is just a dumb ole man,  he is going to be the conservative jimmy carter.


On the other side, Bin Ladin is very rock n roll. He will be like middle eastern Mao. 20 years from now, airhead anarchists will watch his tapes while reading the Little Read Book.
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: Clara Listensprechen on March 11, 2014, 01:14:59 PM
Quote from: David on March 08, 2014, 01:34:59 PM
Quote from: Clara Listensprechen on March 08, 2014, 12:40:34 PM
Despite who tries to write history, archaeologists always PWN historians.  akudood;
yeah2` bad archaeologists suck

All of those are currently working for The History Channel.  The good ones are doing real archaeology, and they still PWN historians.
bassir;
Title: Re: Serious Poll: Who will be considered the winner according to the historians?
Post by: Hiro on March 17, 2014, 04:08:02 AM
jimmy carter is the fucking bomb
Text only | Text with Images