welcome to the PoLiCe StaTE, shitcunts. Paul 2012 smithicide;
I want to be part of a revolution
Quote from: Twilight Echo on December 14, 2011, 02:47:40 PM
I want to be part of a revolution
Me too, if I die I don't have to worry about shit anymore AWESOME
... though if people think like that then WWIII is inevitable. Sigh
keep calm and carry on!
Quote from: NPR on December 14, 2011, 02:49:48 PM
Me too, if I die I don't have to worry about shit anymore AWESOME
... though if people think like that then WWIII is inevitable. Sigh
Dying?
pfft I will see it to the end. I'd like to see anyone actually kill me. baddood;
revolution has been a dream of mine for like always
Quote from: Twilight Echo on December 14, 2011, 02:52:43 PM
Dying?
pfft I will see it to the end. I'd like to see anyone actually kill me. baddood;
revolution has been a dream of mine for like always
I re-watched the South Park movie the other day and the "la resistance" song always makes me want to go do some bold and daring
It also reminds me I'd probably die girl;
hey guys. you know like. people are . like. .. currently protesting this .s hit . idk if you noticed this or not
The bill passed 93-7. That is 93% compared to the 66% needed for an overrride of the veto. You'd need at least 27 people to back down before his veto would even be worth anything.
Ron Paul wouldn't be able to do shit against a veto override either.
Quote from: DeepForrestGhost link=topic=57569.msg1156783#msg1156783 date=1323903425
hey guys. you know like. people are . like. .. currently protesting this .s hit . idk if you noticed this or not
Pshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Some revolution
Owie, I got tazed, quick someone post it on youtube cry;
Quote from: NPR on December 14, 2011, 02:59:36 PM
Pshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Some revolution
Owie, I got tazed, quick someone post it on youtube cry;
wat the heck am i reading
if you listen closely, you can hear the russia today staff room erupting in celebration. ifeelbetter;
Quote from: Khadafi on December 14, 2011, 02:57:35 PM
The bill passed 93-7. That is 93% compared to the 66% needed for an overrride of the veto. You'd need at least 27 people to back down before his veto would even be worth anything.
Ron Paul wouldn't be able to do shit against a veto override either.
i just meant I'd rather vote for paul than some shitheaded nig
ger who would let this happen
Quote from: silvertone on December 14, 2011, 03:02:38 PM
wat the heck am i reading
i hope to dear jesus god ypr is joking
https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3895&s_sbsrc=111205_AdvocacyNDAA_fixNDAAredirect
here you go Revolutionaries. you can like. do something while you still have a shred of freedom
Sigh... I wish you guys knew me in real life
I was hoping the pshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh gave it away
yeah i am not really good at verbal things sorry lol
Quote from: silvertone on December 14, 2011, 03:05:20 PM
https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3895&s_sbsrc=111205_AdvocacyNDAA_fixNDAAredirect
here you go Revolutionaries. you can like. do something while you still have a shred of freedom
ya right like im givin my name and email to some liberal blog so they can email me every fucking 2 days about their next little campaign rouser
imstill getting emails from the anti-patriot act petition
all of you guys should be happy with your taserings.
Quote from: Dovydas on December 14, 2011, 03:08:55 PM
all of you guys should be happy with your taserings.
move to russia then
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 03:08:30 PM
ya right like im givin my name and email to some liberal blog so they can email me every fucking 2 days about their next little campaign rouser
imstill getting emails from the anti-patriot act petition
if you click the thing at the bottom you don't get the emails
i doubt even the supreme court would find those flagrant provisions constitutional
Quote from: silvertone on December 14, 2011, 03:10:52 PM
if you click the thing at the bottom you don't get the emails
i was jk i did it 12 times
Yeah lets vote ron paul then we can have a religious police state instead of a police state !!!!!!! lubdoods;
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 03:32:17 PM
i was jk i did it 12 times
We Can Not Fuck Around In a Time Like This.
Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 03:32:38 PM
Yeah lets vote ron paul then we can have a religious police state instead of a police state !!!!!!! lubdoods;
you have huntsman confused with paul
Quote from: silvertone on December 14, 2011, 03:33:28 PM
We Can Not Fuck Around In a Time Like This.
i'm not fuckin around. what is obama's phone number?
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 03:33:50 PM
you have huntsman confused with paul
ron paul doesn't believe in seperation of church and state fyi he thinks that it should be "the state's decision" inb4 religious troops patrolling street. that alone is enough for me to not vote for him
I'm pretty sure I'm voting for Obama given the potential candidates. At least he's good with foreign relations for the most part
im voting for nayder still lol
Quote from: NPR on December 14, 2011, 03:38:58 PM
I'm pretty sure I'm voting for Obama given the potential candidates. At least he's good with foreign relations for the most part
I guess... but he does support the Israeli occupation of Gaza and such so that isn't so great in terms of foreign policy
Quote from: silvertone on December 14, 2011, 03:39:48 PM
im voting for nayder still lol
that guy is still trying wtf? akudood;
I'm voting for [REDACTED]
firm supporter of the australian ballot here
Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 03:35:45 PM
ron paul doesn't believe in seperation of church and state fyi he thinks that it should be "the state's decision" inb4 religious troops patrolling street. that alone is enough for me to not vote for him
not that I really agree with the philosophy of that but I think the idea, in the Paulian philosophy, is to delegate as much power as possible to states. like in an ideal united states (i am aware the articles of confederation existed).
like, sure, alabama can have a governor-bishop, and california can continue to worship money and pot. what's the problem, why should i get to make ethical decisions about people i will never talk to in my life?
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 03:43:19 PM
alabama can have a governor-bishop...what's the problem
lol
Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 03:55:28 PM
lol
no sr
s, I don't live in alabama or know anyone there so I don't feel like I should have the right to tell them they shouldn't value religion if they really want to, and I also don't want them making laws about issues that only affect where I live (mexicans and pot). either have no laws, or do this, seems like a viable solution to actually enforce democracy
Quote from: Twilight Echo on December 14, 2011, 03:40:15 PM
I guess... but he does support the Israeli occupation of Gaza and such so that isn't so great in terms of foreign policy
Doesn't he also emphasize less us support for Israel? Or maybe that was some wonderful dream I had
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iFsyaljotNCsnPSzq9tjRtOkPKZg?docId=e3c1b02ccc1a42b78e94120a4a2f53a5 ffadsffcvx
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 04:17:27 PM
no srs, I don't live in alabama or know anyone there so I don't feel like I should have the right to tell them they shouldn't value religion if they really want to, and I also don't want them making laws about issues that only affect where I live (mexicans and pot). either have no laws, or do this, seems like a viable solution to actually enforce democracy
But why stop at the state line?
Why should voters in Suffolk County decide the laws here in Essex County?
Why stop at the county?
Why should voters in Salem decide the laws here in Lynn?
City?
Why should voters in That ward decide the laws in this ward?
Not saying that I don't see your point but why is State the threshold for laws when different wards of a city can have variances in their laws?
Quote from: Khadafi on December 14, 2011, 04:47:23 PM
But why stop at the state line?
Why should voters in Suffolk County decide the laws here in Essex County?
Why stop at the county?
Why should voters in Salem decide the laws here in Lynn?
City?
Why should voters in That ward decide the laws in this ward?
Not saying that I don't see your point but why is State the threshold for laws when different wards of a city can have variances in their laws?
I'm actually completely in support of city-states and have always thought that the USA should be divided into 'super states' based roughly on economic regions that join together in some loosely regulated but mutually agreed-upon confederation for purposes of national defense and foreign trade
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 04:49:37 PM
I'm actually completely in support of city-states and have always thought that the USA should be divided into 'super states' based roughly on economic regions that join together in some loosely regulated but mutually agreed-upon confederation for purposes of national defense and foreign trade
But what if one city is radical and forms an army and attacks a nearby city? What then Mister? Who will step in to stop it? Give them enough power and its bound to happen somewhere, just look at what the fed does with power. We are invading pretty much every country on the planet.
I think the West Texan Union should invade the socali federation because there are so many fags.
Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 04:56:29 PM
But what if one city is radical and forms an army and attacks a nearby city? What then Mister? Who will step in to stop it? Give them enough power and its bound to happen somewhere, just look at what the fed does with power. We are invading pretty much every country on the planet.
obviously I'm not talking about replicating the politics of athens and sparta, someone would have to use their big ol brain to figure out fair and enforceable inter-city regulations that would disencourage civil wars (this shouldn't be difficult considering we have the internet and are no longer concerned with winning land for the sake of raping the native population)
Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 05:00:20 PM(this shouldn't be difficult considering we have the internet and are no longer concerned with winning land for the sake of raping the native population)
Speak for yourself. AWESOME
Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 05:03:54 PM
Speak for yourself. AWESOME
ok ive concluded you are trolling my band
Quote from: Snowy on December 14, 2011, 05:06:28 PM
Wait, what isn't he vetoing? confuseddood;
snowy go play with your toys the big boys are talking philip; philip; philip; philip;
Didn't the Articles of Confederation already try small government?
Quote from: NPR on December 14, 2011, 05:32:28 PM
Didn't the Articles of Confederation already try small government?
Something like that.
I am not sure small government like that can work, but I don't know if the Articles of Confederation are a good expample of that.
i support it
if u r against it u probably have something to hide, commies and terrorists