Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:20:23 PM

Title: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:20:23 PM
Let's.  caterpie;

NO ADMIN'S ARE ALLOWED TO COMMENT. NOR ARE MOD'S. ONLY MEMBERS. THIS RULE WILL BE STRICTLY INFORCED AND ANY ADMIN'S/MOD'S POSTING IN HERE WILL BE DEALT WITH ACCORDINGLY.

So let's have it people. How do you guys feel about our staff here?
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:21:04 PM
I think some people suck. I got plans, but I'd be banned for naming them and shit.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on June 03, 2007, 03:21:44 PM
Dey sux penus. awesome; Ugh.. i'll just say something else other than that...

So anyways, they need to validate more people, because it's kinda dead in here sometimes...
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Riosan on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:17 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on June 03, 2007, 03:21:44 PM
Dey sux penus.


gtfo. I am being serious, nothing.  argh;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.

You're a dick.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Riosan on June 03, 2007, 03:23:11 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.

You're a dick.


Response response response.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on June 03, 2007, 03:23:27 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:17 PM
Quote from: Original_MIB on June 03, 2007, 03:21:44 PM
Dey sux penus.


gtfo. I am being serious, nothing.  argh;
Fine...  flower;

I'll edit my post.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:24:19 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:23:11 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.

You're a dick.


Response response response.


Response as to why you're a dick.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:25:03 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:24:19 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:23:11 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.

You're a dick.


Response response response.


Response as to why you're a dick.
He's not doing anything.


I don't like Lawlz. He comes and fucks with everything. It seems without him there really is a lot less spam.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Sports1 on June 03, 2007, 03:25:37 PM
I dunno, I think there fine. Now, lets get andy in here and see what happens.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:26:13 PM
Quote from: Sports1 on June 03, 2007, 03:25:37 PM
I dunno, I think there fine. Now, lets get andy in here and see what happens.


Let's not.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:26:33 PM
Quote from: Sports1 on June 03, 2007, 03:25:37 PM
I dunno, I think there fine. Now, lets get andy in here and see what happens.
He'd be banned immediately, before he could suck up to being an admin.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:27:06 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:25:03 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:24:19 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:23:11 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.

You're a dick.


Response response response.


Response as to why you're a dick.
He's not doing anything.


I don't like Lawlz. He comes and fucks with everything. It seems without him there really is a lot less spam.


Although Lawlz is funny, he is also an example of some of the users we would be better off without.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 03:30:12 PM
This is the only thing I'm going to post in here, I'll delete any OTHER admin/mod posts.

caterpie;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Riosan on June 03, 2007, 03:30:58 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:25:03 PM
He's not doing anything.


He must be talking about his rule about how no mods or admins are supposed to post here. V, I'm not saying anything.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Sports1 on June 03, 2007, 03:31:22 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:26:33 PM
Quote from: Sports1 on June 03, 2007, 03:25:37 PM
I dunno, I think there fine. Now, lets get andy in here and see what happens.
He'd be banned immediately, before he could suck up to being an admin.


You see? This place is already better than Nsider.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:32:11 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:30:12 PM
This is the only thing I'm going to post in here, I'll delete any OTHER admin/mod posts.

caterpie;
Helpful, but sometimes a bit too random for me.

Also, told me I'm stupid for using XD.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:32:26 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:30:58 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:25:03 PM
He's not doing anything.


He must be talking about his rule about how no mods or admins are supposed to post here. V, I'm not saying anything.

...why must you feel the need to fuck with my thread because you have authority?  gonk;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
I think it's pretty unfair that mods and admins can't post their own opinions in this thread. It's not like we all conspire together.

As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?

I think we also have too many mods, and that sometimes some of the mods can be unfair too, myself included. I've loosened up a bit, but recently I was extremely strict...

And Milad, leave the posts alone. Be fair, please.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:33:58 PM
FOR ONCE, CAN THERE BE A THREAD THAT HASN'T BEEN SHIT ON?!
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:35:07 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
I think it's pretty unfair that mods and admins can't post their own opinions in this thread. It's not like we all conspire together.

As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?

I think we also have too many mods, and that sometimes some of the mods can be unfair too, myself included. I've loosened up a bit, but recently I was extremely strict...

And Milad, leave the posts alone. Be fair, please.

I asked to keep it mod free because I knew it would be filled with non-serious posts. Like ricky and LCK presented.

Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on June 03, 2007, 03:35:53 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:27:06 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:25:03 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:24:19 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:23:11 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: Dexter on June 03, 2007, 03:22:07 PM
Comment comment comment. Words words words.

You're a dick.


Response response response.


Response as to why you're a dick.
He's not doing anything.


I don't like Lawlz. He comes and fucks with everything. It seems without him there really is a lot less spam.


Although Lawlz is funny, he is also an example of some of the users we would be better off without.
He's kind of an ass sometimes... but he's ok.  flower;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on June 03, 2007, 03:37:18 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:35:07 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
I think it's pretty unfair that mods and admins can't post their own opinions in this thread. It's not like we all conspire together.

As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?

I think we also have too many mods, and that sometimes some of the mods can be unfair too, myself included. I've loosened up a bit, but recently I was extremely strict...

And Milad, leave the posts alone. Be fair, please.

I asked to keep it mod free because I knew it would be filled with non-serious posts. Like ricky and LCK presented.




Well you won't see any of that from me. Unlike most of the people with power here, I'm able to distinguish seriousness from silliness when it's in The Lobby.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:37:55 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:37:18 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:35:07 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
I think it's pretty unfair that mods and admins can't post their own opinions in this thread. It's not like we all conspire together.

As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?

I think we also have too many mods, and that sometimes some of the mods can be unfair too, myself included. I've loosened up a bit, but recently I was extremely strict...

And Milad, leave the posts alone. Be fair, please.

I asked to keep it mod free because I knew it would be filled with non-serious posts. Like ricky and LCK presented.




Well you won't see any of that from me. Unlike most of the people with power here, I'm able to distinguish seriousness from silliness when it's in The Lobby.


And that is exactly why you won the Admin battle.  educate;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Feynman on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: FAMY2 on June 03, 2007, 03:39:32 PM
  In all honesty I think that the Admins are divided on how things should be. It results in a lot of tension. Then again the members are the same way.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:41:00 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
The most questionable is Lawlz, to me. How did he manage that?
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:42:52 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder

There's only one thing to do.
De-admin Milad.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on June 03, 2007, 03:43:43 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder



So in other words, all we really need is Bassir and maybe a backup admin to help him. Of course, that'll never happen, because none of you want to give up your positions. You've all gone mad with power.  argh;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:44:52 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;
This is a serious topic, sir.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:45:02 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:43:43 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder



So in other words, all we really need is Bassir and maybe a backup admin to help him. Of course, that'll never happen, because none of you want to give up your positions. You've all gone mad with power.  argh;
Who do you think would be the easiest to let go?

Also, I think Milad funds this place, so he's valuable.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 03:45:12 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;

lmao
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:42:52 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder

There's only one thing to do.
De-admin Milad.
'Scuse me, me and Reaper own this site. Then Lawlz is part of the balancing act.

If one of us wasn't here, then the place would be unbalanced. All of us want it our own way, and the average of how we all like it makes this, which is working out pretty good. If one of us had to step down, this entire place would be in disarray.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on June 03, 2007, 03:45:16 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;


You should be banned every time you ask. NO NO NO FUCKING NO.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:45:41 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:44:52 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;
This is a serious topic, sir.

Seriously, I want to be a Mod or Admin
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:45:12 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;

lmao
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:42:52 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder

There's only one thing to do.
De-admin Milad.
'Scuse me, me and Reaper own this site. Then Lawlz is part of the balancing act.

If one of us wasn't here, then the place would be unbalanced. All of us want it our own way, and the average of how we all like it makes this, which is working out pretty good. If one of us had to step down, this entire place would be in disarray.
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:46:17 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;


I expected seriousness here, Zack. Stop clowning around.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:46:37 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:45:41 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:44:52 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;
This is a serious topic, sir.

Seriously, I want to be a Mod or Admin
So do a lot of people.
But it's not happening.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:47:18 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:45:12 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;

lmao
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:42:52 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder

There's only one thing to do.
De-admin Milad.
'Scuse me, me and Reaper own this site. Then Lawlz is part of the balancing act.

If one of us wasn't here, then the place would be unbalanced. All of us want it our own way, and the average of how we all like it makes this, which is working out pretty good. If one of us had to step down, this entire place would be in disarray.
You could be replaced.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on June 03, 2007, 03:47:58 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:45:12 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;

lmao
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:42:52 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder

There's only one thing to do.
De-admin Milad.
'Scuse me, me and Reaper own this site. Then Lawlz is part of the balancing act.

If one of us wasn't here, then the place would be unbalanced. All of us want it our own way, and the average of how we all like it makes this, which is working out pretty good. If one of us had to step down, this entire place would be in disarray.


Okay, I see what you mean. That tactic certainly works, but there's just one problem...

Reaper. He's a great guy, a great admin, but he doesn't usually contribute to the "balancing act." He seems too passive. I'm not really saying that's a bad thing, I'm just saying that the "balance" isn't so balanced after all. Reaper often doesn't have an opinion or just isn't here during a debate.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:27 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:47:58 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:45:12 PM
Quote from: Zack777 on June 03, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Can I be a Mod or Admin  awesome;

lmao
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:42:52 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 03:39:13 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
As for the administration in general, I find it horribly disorganized, unfair, inefficient, and too big. Why do we have 4 admins? What do all of them even do?


What was that?


Read it again, think about it, and seriously tell me what each of you do.
Bassir - Everything
Me - Placeholder
Lawlz - Placeholder
Reaper - Placeholder

There's only one thing to do.
De-admin Milad.
'Scuse me, me and Reaper own this site. Then Lawlz is part of the balancing act.

If one of us wasn't here, then the place would be unbalanced. All of us want it our own way, and the average of how we all like it makes this, which is working out pretty good. If one of us had to step down, this entire place would be in disarray.


Okay, I see what you mean. That tactic certainly works, but there's just one problem...

Reaper. He's a great guy, a great admin, but he doesn't usually contribute to the "balancing act." He seems too passive. I'm not really saying that's a bad thing, I'm just saying that the "balance" isn't so balanced after all. Reaper often doesn't have an opinion or just isn't here during a debate.

I have noticed this too. I was wondering how he made it so far in the Admin battle. I never see him have an opinion on any serious matters here.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 03:50:44 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.
At administrator rank? china;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:51:00 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.


Not in our administration.  psyduck; That's what we have Andrew for.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:51:17 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:50:44 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.
At administrator rank? china;
HELLS YEAH!
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:51:28 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:51:00 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.


Not in our administration.  psyduck; That's what we have Andrew for.
Andrew was kicked off. psyduck;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:52:05 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:51:28 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:51:00 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.


Not in our administration.  psyduck; That's what we have Andrew for.
Andrew was kicked off. psyduck;


When did this happen?  psyduck;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:52:28 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:52:05 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:51:28 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:51:00 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.


Not in our administration.  psyduck; That's what we have Andrew for.
Andrew was kicked off. psyduck;


When did this happen?  psyduck;
Dunno, but look at his rank.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:52:45 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:50:44 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.
At administrator rank? china;
it ballances it out
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: V on June 03, 2007, 03:53:47 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:52:28 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:52:05 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:51:28 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:51:00 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:49:39 PM
Quote from: V on June 03, 2007, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:47:38 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:47:02 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:46:07 PM
Could I replace Lawlz, then?
That would result in our amazing balancing act falling apart.

dawkins;
Seriously, what does Lawlz do to uphold the balance?


Makes jokes, and posts cut open scrotums that get us kicked off our host.
Well, I could do that.

..but that is not a good thing.  psyduck;
Every forum needs a rebel.


Not in our administration.  psyduck; That's what we have Andrew for.
Andrew was kicked off. psyduck;


When did this happen?  psyduck;
Dunno, but look at his rank.


I thought you meant he was banned. He is still our rebel. It shouldn't be someone with an admin status that rebels.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 03:55:28 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:52:45 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 03:50:44 PMAt administrator rank? china;
it ballances it out
...

You got me.

emo;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:57:07 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?
Bassir.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Feynman on June 03, 2007, 03:57:57 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?


I'm working on something. No big deal.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:58:59 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:57:07 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?
Bassir.

Okay. One Will hold, I suppose. Not exactly balancing it out if he leaves though.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:59:52 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:58:59 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:57:07 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?
Bassir.

Okay. One Will hold, I suppose. Not exactly balancing it out if he leaves though.
So he can't. Or Milad. The other two, I guess they could. psyduck;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 04:00:50 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 03:59:52 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:58:59 PM
Quote from: LCK on June 03, 2007, 03:57:07 PM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?
Bassir.

Okay. One Will hold, I suppose. Not exactly balancing it out if he leaves though.
So he can't. Or Milad. The other two, I guess they could. psyduck;

We're all fucked if he leaves then.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 04:02:02 PM
Actually, I could figure it out. I've had to fix a few things with MySQL before, and I think I would know what was wrong with it.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: SBKT on June 03, 2007, 04:04:01 PM
I could easily learn. I have a short learning time and shit.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Feynman on June 03, 2007, 04:14:55 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 04:02:02 PM
Actually, I could figure it out. I've had to fix a few things with MySQL before, and I think I would know what was wrong with it.


Nothing is wrong. I'm just working on something and constantly updating unfinished files.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 04:15:54 PM
Quote from: Bassir on June 03, 2007, 04:14:55 PM
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 03, 2007, 04:02:02 PM
Actually, I could figure it out. I've had to fix a few things with MySQL before, and I think I would know what was wrong with it.


Nothing is wrong. I'm just working on something and constantly updating unfinished files.
I NEVER SAID ANYTHING WAS WRONG, I SAID IF SOMEONE WAS WRONG.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Pancake Paraphernalia on June 03, 2007, 04:18:00 PM
i liek the mods/admins except for a few like rick- nvm, flame words getting hotter.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Daddy on October 21, 2007, 01:42:30 AM
Quote from: VaatixGanon on June 03, 2007, 03:56:35 PM
I really have to ask; How many Admins here could actually fix the forum is a Parse or MySQL error occured?
LOL THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO US.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Sam on October 21, 2007, 07:19:38 AM
I don't really have any comments to make, to me they're the same as every other user... I'm not even really sure who's a mod and who isn't.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Houdini on October 21, 2007, 10:48:06 AM
Quote from: samsam on October 21, 2007, 07:19:38 AM
I don't really have any comments to make, to me they're the same as every other user... I'm not even really sure who's a mod and who isn't.
ghjiose p[igbn
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: ncba93ivyase on October 21, 2007, 10:48:46 AM
Quote from: Guava on October 21, 2007, 10:48:06 AM
ghjiose p[igbn
Gloighouse pigpen.

That's how I read that. powerofone;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Houdini on October 21, 2007, 10:51:50 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on October 21, 2007, 10:48:46 AM
Gloighouse pigpen.

That's how I read that. powerofone;
Cool, now do this one:

pieorghun hgng0y8wer
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: YPrrrr on October 21, 2007, 10:54:09 AM
Quote from: Guava on October 21, 2007, 10:51:50 AM
Cool, now do this one:

pieorghun hgng0y8wer
Penguin hangover psyduck;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Houdini on October 21, 2007, 10:55:42 AM
Quote from: Your Posting Rival on October 21, 2007, 10:54:09 AM
Penguin hangover psyduck;
bwrnoapvo bvpsiu
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: C.Mongler on October 21, 2007, 10:56:26 AM
I honestly don't have a problem with any of the administration here  psyduck;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: YPrrrr on October 21, 2007, 10:58:41 AM
Quote from: Guava on October 21, 2007, 10:55:42 AM
bwrnoapvo bvpsiu
brown proviso pepto bismal

Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Houdini on October 21, 2007, 11:04:15 AM
Quote from: Your Posting Rival on October 21, 2007, 10:58:41 AM
brown proviso pepto bismal


Daaaaaang.

agibgab neha[e ghre9 nbfdjk
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: YPrrrr on October 21, 2007, 11:08:11 AM
Quote from: Guava on October 21, 2007, 11:04:15 AM
Daaaaaang.

agibgab neha[e ghre9 nbfdjk
Dang.

gibralter inhale gonerhea NCAA Football edumacate;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: prjuni on October 21, 2007, 07:27:24 PM
Well  I think the mods here are pretty solid.
We have an asshole (v) we have a slut (kaz) and we have a guava.

Only thing is some of you have to clean up your act. Otherwise keep up the good work.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: JGE on October 21, 2007, 07:31:14 PM
As far as the Mods here go, I have no problem with V, Thief can be a ass at times but passable, Kaz is starting to piss me off with his attitude and as for any other mod I forgot to manage I really have nothing to say about.

As for admins, Lawlz is turning me off to this forum every second of the day for his fanboyish/trolling/Whatever the hell you wanna call it attitude.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Title27GT on October 21, 2007, 07:33:04 PM
needs moar riosan
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Houdini on October 21, 2007, 08:40:52 PM
Quote from: Precursor on October 21, 2007, 07:31:14 PM
As far as the Mods here go, I have no problem with V, Thief can be a ass at times but passable, Kaz is starting to piss me off with his attitude and as for any other mod I forgot to manage I really have nothing to say about.

As for admins, Lawlz is turning me off to this forum every second of the day for his fanboyish/trolling/Whatever the hell you wanna call it attitude.
Whiner.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on October 21, 2007, 10:15:30 PM
Quote from: Precursor on October 21, 2007, 07:31:14 PM
Kaz is starting to piss me off with his attitude


lol
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Daddy on October 21, 2007, 11:43:18 PM
Quote from: steal on October 21, 2007, 11:22:45 PM
I LOVE HOW NO ONE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT I AM IN FACT A MOD.
Look at the date of the thread. It was from when Milad was still an admin.
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: JGE on October 22, 2007, 01:19:03 AM
WHINE WHINE BITCH BITCH

FAGGOTS
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Samus Aran on October 22, 2007, 01:23:34 AM
Quote from: Rei Kazanami on June 03, 2007, 03:33:46 PM
I think we also have too many mods, and that sometimes some of the mods can be unfair too, myself included. I've loosened up a bit, but recently I was extremely strict...


Lol oops. I ended up going through strict stages more than once after this post. caterpie;
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on October 27, 2007, 11:23:28 AM
lol
Title: Re: ITT, WE DISCUSS THE ADMINISTRATION HERE.
Post by: Blaze-Senpai on October 27, 2007, 11:31:46 AM
It's not that bad.. I say its fine for what the forum is about.