Boyah Forums

General => The Arts => Topic started by: on December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM

Poll
Question: do you like them?
Option 1: yes votes: 0
Option 2: no votes: 5
Option 3: sometimes votes: 8
Title: pitchfork
Post by: snorkel on May 02, 2010, 12:54:40 AM
I dislike Pitchfork because it's one of the only major and popular venues for good indie music media (news, reviews, etc) yet their taste is rather awful. They exaggerate the greatness of shitty indie bands while denying that albums like Demon Days are the greatest ever, and the new music they feature is of haphazard choosing and influenced by something besides quality.

I do occasionally find good new music there, though, but I prefer the circuit design/indie music blogs (that sounds lame as fuck) for taste
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Geno on May 02, 2010, 12:56:42 AM
Quote from: wziard on May 02, 2010, 12:54:40 AM
They exaggerate the greatness of shitty indie bands while denying that albums like Demon Days are the greatest ever
I think that's called having an opinion
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Samus Aran on May 02, 2010, 01:03:21 AM
Quote from: GENOP on May 02, 2010, 12:56:42 AM
I think that's called having an opinion


actually, Geno, in the case of Pitchfork, it's pretty legitimate to say they exaggerate things one way or the other

the other thing that Pitchfork does that annoys the fuck out of me is that their writers seem to write reviews with a thesaurus close by, because i sure see a lot of pseudo-intellectualism in the language style, and not a whole lot of actual "reviewing"
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Placebo Headwound on May 02, 2010, 01:29:05 AM
I read it sometimes for news when I'm bored. I never pay attention to their reviews.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Zach on May 02, 2010, 05:59:06 AM
Quote from: Lain on May 02, 2010, 01:03:21 AM
actually, Geno, in the case of Pitchfork, it's pretty legitimate to say they exaggerate things one way or the other

the other thing that Pitchfork does that annoys the fuck out of me is that their writers seem to write reviews with a thesaurus close by, because i sure see a lot of pseudo-intellectualism in the language style, and not a whole lot of actual "reviewing"


Yeah, they definitely have the hipster thing going on.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: the shortest route to the sea on May 02, 2010, 10:44:06 AM
I use their ratings to get a ballpark estimate of how the album is, but really it's not that much information. the reviews are pretty useless.

also, arcade fire pitchfork drinking game: take a shot whenever you read the word catharsis
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: C.Mongler on May 02, 2010, 02:43:08 PM
Quote from: wziard on May 02, 2010, 12:54:40 AM
albums like Demon Days are the greatest ever


lol
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Travis on May 02, 2010, 03:36:07 PM
pitchfork can SUCK MY COCK
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: ?????? on May 02, 2010, 04:40:30 PM
PitchFork gave Portishead an incredibly low score.  giggle;
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: C.Mongler on May 02, 2010, 05:10:10 PM
Quote from: Analysis Paralysis on May 02, 2010, 04:40:30 PM
PitchFork gave Portishead an incredibly low score.  giggle;


you consider 8.8 and 8.2 incredibly low score?
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Cookie on May 02, 2010, 08:03:35 PM
Is it weird that I've never heard of pitchfork before?
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Samus Aran on May 02, 2010, 08:09:37 PM
Quote from: Cookie on May 02, 2010, 08:03:35 PM
Is it weird that I've never heard of pitchfork before?


uh, yeah
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Daddy on May 02, 2010, 10:38:43 PM
only to watch out for upcoming albums
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Socks on May 03, 2010, 07:42:44 AM
Quote from: Cookie on May 02, 2010, 08:03:35 PM
Is it weird that I've never heard of pitchfork before?


not at all.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Geno on May 03, 2010, 07:47:00 AM
Quote from: Cookie on May 02, 2010, 08:03:35 PM
Is it weird that I've never heard of pitchfork before?
Well if you aren't into music then no not really
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Andrew1911 on May 03, 2010, 10:34:09 AM
Quote from: wziard on May 02, 2010, 12:54:40 AM
They exaggerate the greatness of shitty indie bands while denying that albums like Demon Days are the greatest ever


wat

Quote from: Lain on May 02, 2010, 01:03:21 AM
the other thing that Pitchfork does that annoys the fuck out of me is that their writers seem to write reviews with a thesaurus close by, because i sure see a lot of pseudo-intellectualism in the language style, and not a whole lot of actual "reviewing"


God yes.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: [hedy]Zidone on May 03, 2010, 07:43:37 PM
they seem to rate merzbow higher than the mars volta akudood;

nonetheless i still look at them for comparisons n shit
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Cookie on May 03, 2010, 08:06:56 PM
Quote from: GENOP on May 03, 2010, 07:47:00 AM
Well if you aren't into music then no not really

I would say I am into music. But I guess just with the bands I already listen too, I'm not really into finding new music.

Also I went there today and it's kinda boring.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Dullahan on May 03, 2010, 08:37:46 PM
I've never heard of Pitchfork before either.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Houdini on May 06, 2010, 08:49:21 PM
I dislike Pitchfork mainly because they really aren't forward-thinking at all. It seems to me like they mainly hype bands because of their similarity to older, better known bands that they like. Band X gets hyped because they sound like old surf rock; Band Y gets hyped because they mimic mainstream R&B in a manner accessible to the average indie listener; Band Z gets hyped because they rip off afropop or dubstep or some other genre that most people don't even listen to.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: Bushy on May 11, 2010, 06:30:12 PM
Only go there for reviews. Disagree with them so much it's not even funny.

Demon Days really isn't that great though. A few songs yeah, but Plastic Beach >>> Demon Days.

And not giving Kid Cudi's debut at least a 6 bugged me.
Title: Re: pitchfork
Post by: spaceman on May 11, 2010, 08:13:45 PM
They're good for news, good for interviews, and somewhat good at alerting me of upcoming stuff. Their reviews are rubbish, and they have to be taken with a grain of salt. Also agree on the thesaurus thing. God damn.