How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
The spiderman games suck ass. psyduck;
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:01:54 PM
The spiderman games suck ass. psyduck;
Are you fuckin' retarded? They're some pf the only good movie games out there. psyduck;
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
Hell no.
Spiderman 2/3 take the cake,
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
against one. Big fucking deal. It doesn't matter what the plot is. The gameplay is waaaaaay superior to the PS1 SM. You know it.
Quote from: MILADMAAAN on June 01, 2007, 10:17:36 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
Hell no.
Spiderman 2/3 take the cake,
Srsly.
The cool thing about the 1st was that you could be the Green Goblin, but that's about it.
Now, if he was in 2/3.... flower;
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:18:42 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
against one. Big fucking deal. It doesn't matter what the plot is. The gameplay is waaaaaay superior to the PS1 SM. You know it.
God, I really think to myself "Who the hell let you join?"
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:23:12 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:18:42 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
against one. Big fucking deal. It doesn't matter what the plot is. The gameplay is waaaaaay superior to the PS1 SM. You know it.
God, I really think to myself "Who the hell let you join?"
Because I have an opinion that the old Spider Man game is nowhere near as good as the new ones? psyduck;
Seriously, if you don't like people voicing their opinions, than feel free to leave this topic. You won't be missed.
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:28:44 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:23:12 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:18:42 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:07:04 PM
Quote from: Kefka on June 01, 2007, 10:06:05 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 01, 2007, 09:20:09 PM
How are the damn Spider Man games always so fuckin' awesome? gonk;
My friend got it for the 360. yes; yes; yes;
The graphics are nice, and the cut scenes may be enough to make RE4 piss its pants.
Well, ok, maybe not, but I enjoyed the cut cenes alot more in SM3 than I did in RE4.
There was only one good one, and it was based on the actual COMICS, not a shitty movie, and it came out for the most hated PS1.
Umm, no. That game wasn't that good.
Actually its actually the best Spiderman game.
Hell no.
Hell yes. Outnumbered.
against one. Big fucking deal. It doesn't matter what the plot is. The gameplay is waaaaaay superior to the PS1 SM. You know it.
God, I really think to myself "Who the hell let you join?"
Because I have an opinion that the old Spider Man game is nowhere near as good as the new ones? psyduck;
Seriously, if you don't like people voicing their opinions, than feel free to leave this topic. You won't be missed.
They let you in just because you masturbate to shitty spiderman games with all of 5 hours of gameplay, which they lie about and say it's months on Teevee?
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:19:40 PM
They let you in just because you masturbate to shitty spiderman games with all of 5 hours of gameplay, which they lie about and say it's months on Teevee?
[/quote]So they're short. Big freakin' deal. So was the PS1 version.
Even if the origional had 20 hours of gameplay, the time you get out of the 3rd is a far better use of your time.
Ugh, you wrecked the quotes.
I'd have more gameplay and shitty graphics over awesome graphics and nearly no gameplay. It's not a waste of my money if I will play it and play it more, instead of beating the game almost immediately and growing tired of it.
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Right, right, it's less biased that way. navi;
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:38:56 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Right, right, it's less biased that way. navi;
Furthermore, every game ever published by THQ has sucked majorly.
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:41:28 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:38:56 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Right, right, it's less biased that way. navi;
Furthermore, every game ever published by THQ has sucked majorly.
I remember they made this one game, it was okay... Let me find it.
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:42:23 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:41:28 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:38:56 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Right, right, it's less biased that way. navi;
Furthermore, every game ever published by THQ has sucked majorly.
I remember they made this one game, it was okay... Let me find it.
I'd like to see this. Every THQ game I've played has made seppukku look fun by comparison.
Quote from: Houdini on June 02, 2007, 12:07:29 AM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:42:23 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:41:28 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:38:56 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Right, right, it's less biased that way. navi;
Furthermore, every game ever published by THQ has sucked majorly.
I remember they made this one game, it was okay... Let me find it.
I'd like to see this. Every THQ game I've played has made seppukku look fun by comparison.
In wikipedia, they linked it to Team17 which made the awesome Worms series. Odd...
Quote from: SBKT on June 02, 2007, 12:11:25 AM
Quote from: Houdini on June 02, 2007, 12:07:29 AM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:42:23 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:41:28 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:38:56 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: SBKT on June 01, 2007, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
Not taking into the account that there were decent games long long ago... Say, TMNT.
Good point. A more accurate statement would be that all games based on movies released in the era of 3d consoles suck.
Right, right, it's less biased that way. navi;
Furthermore, every game ever published by THQ has sucked majorly.
I remember they made this one game, it was okay... Let me find it.
I'd like to see this. Every THQ game I've played has made seppukku look fun by comparison.
In wikipedia, they linked it to Team17 which made the awesome Worms series. Odd...
Oh yeah, I think THQ did publish Worms at some point.
Well, everything else they published was pretty much cheap licensed crap.
The PS1 spiderman was the best wub;
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
It doesn't matter what querky little insult you add to this post. This is seriously not true.
Though I agree that the vast majority of movie games suck, probably 90% (if not, more), there have been decent ones, and even pretty good ones. LotR 2/3, Spider Man 2/3, and Batman Beyond all fall into that category.
Quote from: General Grievous on June 02, 2007, 09:23:42 AM
Quote from: Houdini on June 01, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
All of you lose the argument because you all wasted your time twiddling your thumbs in front of a TV instead of playing a game that had any redeeming value. It's an established fact that all games based on movies suck and if you think you have a case against this then you can pleasure yourself with your closest female relative's underwear.
It doesn't matter what querky little insult you add to this post. This is seriously not true.
Though I agree that the vast majority of movie games suck, probably 90% (if not, more), there have been decent ones, and even pretty good ones. LotR 2/3, Spider Man 2/3, and Batman Beyond all fall into that category.
You are completely wrong. They're new, and that makes them decent? They got shiny graphics? They really don't, it's about ps1/ps2 quality with a lot of them. They got better gameplay? Depends how you look at it ,but you're saying this through graphics, when on most all new games, the camera will fuck you over so bad it's not funny. Gameplay is amazingly short too for a game that's about 50 bucks. Waste of money, waste of time.
Quote from: SBKT on June 02, 2007, 10:43:54 AM
You are completely wrong. They're new, and that makes them decent? They got shiny graphics? They really don't, it's about ps1/ps2 quality with a lot of them. They got better gameplay? Depends how you look at it ,but you're saying this through graphics, when on most all new games, the camera will fuck you over so bad it's not funny. Gameplay is amazingly short too for a game that's about 50 bucks. Waste of money, waste of time.
I didn't say they did have great graphics. I just stated that SM3 has really nice graphics. The camera never fucks you in this game, and the gameplay, IMO, kicks ass. In my opinion, it isn't a waste of money, or time. The gameplay is really awesome, in addition to badass cuts that are really nicely done that make the game even more interesting. I just think the really nice graphics are a beautiful touch because of the cut scenes.
Is that a bad thing? psyduck;
Quote from: General Grievous on June 02, 2007, 11:06:14 AM
Quote from: SBKT on June 02, 2007, 10:43:54 AM
You are completely wrong. They're new, and that makes them decent? They got shiny graphics? They really don't, it's about ps1/ps2 quality with a lot of them. They got better gameplay? Depends how you look at it ,but you're saying this through graphics, when on most all new games, the camera will fuck you over so bad it's not funny. Gameplay is amazingly short too for a game that's about 50 bucks. Waste of money, waste of time.
I didn't say they did have great graphics. I just stated that SM3 has really nice graphics. The camera never fucks you in this game, and the gameplay, IMO, kicks ass. In my opinion, it isn't a waste of money, or time. The gameplay is really awesome, in addition to badass cuts that are really nicely done that make the game even more interesting. I just think the really nice graphics are a beautiful touch because of the cut scenes.
I can repeat what I just said and still win, because by saying this, you only care about what you think are REALLY GOOD GRAPHICS. That's not what games are.
2D forevar!
Quote from: SBKT on June 02, 2007, 03:02:34 PM
Quote from: General Grievous on June 02, 2007, 11:06:14 AM
Quote from: SBKT on June 02, 2007, 10:43:54 AM
You are completely wrong. They're new, and that makes them decent? They got shiny graphics? They really don't, it's about ps1/ps2 quality with a lot of them. They got better gameplay? Depends how you look at it ,but you're saying this through graphics, when on most all new games, the camera will fuck you over so bad it's not funny. Gameplay is amazingly short too for a game that's about 50 bucks. Waste of money, waste of time.
I didn't say they did have great graphics. I just stated that SM3 has really nice graphics. The camera never fucks you in this game, and the gameplay, IMO, kicks ass. In my opinion, it isn't a waste of money, or time. The gameplay is really awesome, in addition to badass cuts that are really nicely done that make the game even more interesting. I just think the really nice graphics are a beautiful touch because of the cut scenes.
I can repeat what I just said and still win, because by saying this, you only care about what you think are REALLY GOOD GRAPHICS. That's not what games are.
2D forevar!
No, you're an imbecile.
I never base how good a game is just because of graphics. For the last fucking time, this is what I'm stating about the graphics:
In SM3, it has alot of cut scenes that are like RE4's, where you press buttons to do things. They're even better in this if you ask me, because it isn't just "A+B" and "L+R". In fact, I think every single button is used, even directions on each stick, except maybe "LB" and "RB". I really enjoy these cut scenes, because they're really well done. It has an extremley high amount of good quality camera angling in them, which give you a cool feeling. I might even go so far as to call it a rush. The things spidey does in these scenes never really get repetitive. He does a large variety of sick-assed stunts, and cool hits. Add that with awesome graphics, and you get some pretty tight cut scenes.
I could care less about the graphics for the real gameplay. I just think the gameplay is awesome because of the many moves, combos, etc that you can perform. You've got to love zipping all over New York with a variety of web swings, fighting a plethora of colorful and odd gangs, and using shit loads of moves and combos that look pretty fuckin' sick. That's another thing I love about 2/3. You don't just pick levels, and only go on rooftops when you're not in buildings. There is no limit to where you can go as far as outside buildings in this game, as long as it's in NY, NY. Hell, in the 3rd, you can even swim.
Also, I fail to see what you're trying to accomplish by saying "2D forevar", seeing as the first Spider Man was 3D as well.
We're both repeating the same damn thing. There was a 2D spiderman on the SNES, I think.