Boyah Forums

General => Video Games => Topic started by: on December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM

Poll
Question: !?!?
Option 1: Yes votes: 5
Option 2: No votes: 3
Title: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: The artist formally known on May 30, 2007, 06:00:10 AM
http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/news_250507_zelda.html

Yes? No? I like it. Hopefully not as annoying as Windwaker. Too many sneaking parts, and crap like that.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 06:10:30 AM
Looks like shit to me.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: ncba93ivyase on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's being made for and limited on the DS.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:16:33 AM
It's a new Zelda. Twilight Princess sucked too, in my opinion, mainly because it took 4 FUCKING YEARS, AND THaT WAS ALL WE GOT.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Samus Aran on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: The artist formally known on May 30, 2007, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's being made for and limited on the DS.
I think it's supposed to be like any 2D Zelda game but in 3D, if so, I'm defiantly checking it out.

If it sucks, it only costs $35
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: ncba93ivyase on May 30, 2007, 03:58:33 PM
Quote from: Reaper on May 30, 2007, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's being made for and limited on the DS.
I think it's supposed to be like any 2D Zelda game but in 3D, if so, I'm defiantly checking it out.

If it sucks, it only costs $35
$35 that could be spent on better games. $35 THAT COULD BE SPENT GETTING A SEGA SATURN.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: The artist formally known on May 30, 2007, 04:00:30 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 03:58:33 PM
Quote from: Reaper on May 30, 2007, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's being made for and limited on the DS.
I think it's supposed to be like any 2D Zelda game but in 3D, if so, I'm defiantly checking it out.

If it sucks, it only costs $35
$35 that could be spent on better games. $35 THAT COULD BE SPENT GETTING A SEGA SATURN.
Sega Saturn failed for a reason.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 04:10:54 PM
Quote from: Reaper on May 30, 2007, 04:00:30 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 03:58:33 PM
Quote from: Reaper on May 30, 2007, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's being made for and limited on the DS.
I think it's supposed to be like any 2D Zelda game but in 3D, if so, I'm defiantly checking it out.

If it sucks, it only costs $35
$35 that could be spent on better games. $35 THAT COULD BE SPENT GETTING A SEGA SATURN.
Sega Saturn failed for a reason.


I like it  emo;
Mainly due to the light gun shooters  nigga;
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: ncba93ivyase on May 30, 2007, 04:21:44 PM
Quote from: Reaper on May 30, 2007, 04:00:30 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 03:58:33 PM
Quote from: Reaper on May 30, 2007, 03:56:05 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's being made for and limited on the DS.
I think it's supposed to be like any 2D Zelda game but in 3D, if so, I'm defiantly checking it out.

If it sucks, it only costs $35
$35 that could be spent on better games. $35 THAT COULD BE SPENT GETTING A SEGA SATURN.
Sega Saturn failed for a reason.
The Game Gear and Dreamcast didn't.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
You're an idiot. It's a fucking balloon head, and they remade it with Capcom for 2D games which really sucked. The best 3D game was ALSO OoT. Majora's Mask wasn't even supposed to be a Zelda game, it was a project that was taken over.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: ncba93ivyase on May 30, 2007, 04:42:08 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
You're an idiot. It's a fucking balloon head, and they remade it with Capcom for 2D games which really sucked. The best 3D game was ALSO OoT. Majora's Mask wasn't even supposed to be a Zelda game, it was a project that was taken over.
Wind Waker's graphics were smooth, clean, and beautiful. Twilight Princess and OoT are hideous. Not to mention both have absolutely atrocious gameplay.

Majora's Mask and Wind Waker both tried to be different, and both were excellent. MM's only flaw was with the time system and having to restart dungeons all over if you were too slow, but it added to the challenge.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:58:08 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 04:42:08 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
You're an idiot. It's a fucking balloon head, and they remade it with Capcom for 2D games which really sucked. The best 3D game was ALSO OoT. Majora's Mask wasn't even supposed to be a Zelda game, it was a project that was taken over.
Wind Waker's graphics were smooth, clean, and beautiful. Twilight Princess and OoT are hideous. Not to mention both have absolutely atrocious gameplay.

Majora's Mask and Wind Waker both tried to be different, and both were excellent. MM's only flaw was with the time system and having to restart dungeons all over if you were too slow, but it added to the challenge.
You too, are an idiot. OoT was the fist 3d game, and well worth the wait still. Majora's Mask used another game's innards entirely, and Twilight Princess, well of course it sucked.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 05:03:44 PM
I don't know too much about the 3-D Zeldas, but Wind Waker was the only game that was fun enough for me to finish. When I played Ocarina Of Time and Twilight Princess I quickly lost interest. I never played Majora's Mask  emo;
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: ncba93ivyase on May 30, 2007, 05:10:14 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:58:08 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 04:42:08 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
You're an idiot. It's a fucking balloon head, and they remade it with Capcom for 2D games which really sucked. The best 3D game was ALSO OoT. Majora's Mask wasn't even supposed to be a Zelda game, it was a project that was taken over.
Wind Waker's graphics were smooth, clean, and beautiful. Twilight Princess and OoT are hideous. Not to mention both have absolutely atrocious gameplay.

Majora's Mask and Wind Waker both tried to be different, and both were excellent. MM's only flaw was with the time system and having to restart dungeons all over if you were too slow, but it added to the challenge.
You too, are an idiot. OoT was the fist 3d game, and well worth the wait still. Majora's Mask used another game's innards entirely, and Twilight Princess, well of course it sucked.
Just because it was the first 3D Zelda game, it doesn't mean it was good. That'd be like saying Superman 64 and Buubsy 3D are good.

You're a god damn dumbass for viewing these opinions as facts.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 05:10:53 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 05:10:14 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:58:08 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 04:42:08 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
You're an idiot. It's a fucking balloon head, and they remade it with Capcom for 2D games which really sucked. The best 3D game was ALSO OoT. Majora's Mask wasn't even supposed to be a Zelda game, it was a project that was taken over.
Wind Waker's graphics were smooth, clean, and beautiful. Twilight Princess and OoT are hideous. Not to mention both have absolutely atrocious gameplay.

Majora's Mask and Wind Waker both tried to be different, and both were excellent. MM's only flaw was with the time system and having to restart dungeons all over if you were too slow, but it added to the challenge.
You too, are an idiot. OoT was the fist 3d game, and well worth the wait still. Majora's Mask used another game's innards entirely, and Twilight Princess, well of course it sucked.
Just because it was the first 3D Zelda game, it doesn't mean it was good. That'd be like saying Superman 64 and Buubsy 3D are good.

You're a god damn dumbass for viewing these opinions as facts.
If people didn't state their opinions AS facts, then maybe I would.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 05:33:50 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 05:10:53 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 05:10:14 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:58:08 PM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 04:42:08 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 02:05:33 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 12:40:49 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 30, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 30, 2007, 08:08:41 AM
No for completely touch based controls.

Yes for a sequel to Wind Waker.

No for a half-assed sequel that's be made for and limited on the DS.


Took the words right out of my hands.

I fucking loved Wind Waker.
I did too. I thought I'd hate it because of the graphics, but I was wrong, really. The 2d versions of it sort of sucked, though.


Wind Waker was my favorite 3D Zelda, and there was nothing wrong with the graphics.
You're an idiot. It's a fucking balloon head, and they remade it with Capcom for 2D games which really sucked. The best 3D game was ALSO OoT. Majora's Mask wasn't even supposed to be a Zelda game, it was a project that was taken over.
Wind Waker's graphics were smooth, clean, and beautiful. Twilight Princess and OoT are hideous. Not to mention both have absolutely atrocious gameplay.

Majora's Mask and Wind Waker both tried to be different, and both were excellent. MM's only flaw was with the time system and having to restart dungeons all over if you were too slow, but it added to the challenge.
You too, are an idiot. OoT was the fist 3d game, and well worth the wait still. Majora's Mask used another game's innards entirely, and Twilight Princess, well of course it sucked.
Just because it was the first 3D Zelda game, it doesn't mean it was good. That'd be like saying Superman 64 and Buubsy 3D are good.

You're a god damn dumbass for viewing these opinions as facts.
If people didn't state their opinions AS facts, then maybe I would.


All I said was that Wind Waker was my favorite 3-D Zelda game  gonk;
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: demonprince on May 30, 2007, 08:32:32 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
LoZ sux.  psyduck;
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:05:53 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
You're clumping it into where it doesn't belong. It, at most, goes with the third timeline brought up by Capcom made Zelda games.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 10:46:28 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:05:53 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
You're clumping it into where it doesn't belong. It, at most, goes with the third timeline brought up by Capcom made Zelda games.

No, I'm "clumping" it under the category of "Legend of Zelda" games. I don't see what's so hard to understand. Just because it was originally intended to be a different project doesn't stop it from being a 3D Legend of Zelda title, and the best 3D Legend of Zelda at that goddamn it!
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:47:59 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 10:46:28 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:05:53 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
You're clumping it into where it doesn't belong. It, at most, goes with the third timeline brought up by Capcom made Zelda games.

No, I'm "clumping" it under the category of "Legend of Zelda" games. I don't see what's so hard to understand. Just because it was originally intended to be a different project doesn't stop it from being a 3D Legend of Zelda title, and the best 3D Legend of Zelda at that goddamn it!
WEll, I'll let go, I guess.

But in my own view, it doesn't make sense. I'd have loved to have seen what it was SUPPOSED to be.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Samus Aran on May 31, 2007, 12:06:56 AM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:05:53 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
You're clumping it into where it doesn't belong. It, at most, goes with the third timeline brought up by Capcom made Zelda games.


Except for how the opening to Wind Waker states that after the Hero of Time saved Hyrule, he left, making Majora's Mask fit in nicely into that storyline.

Either way, I still love Majora's Mask. I like it a bit more than OOT, actually.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: ncba93ivyase on May 31, 2007, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:05:53 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
You're clumping it into where it doesn't belong. It, at most, goes with the third timeline brought up by Capcom made Zelda games.
You're making it sound like the Oracles games are shit. If that's what you're suggesting, GTFO.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: SBKT on May 31, 2007, 05:35:23 AM
Quote from: Lawlz on May 31, 2007, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 10:05:53 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:31:45 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 30, 2007, 08:25:20 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 30, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

It will make up for Twilight Princess' overrated shit and then some. Celda is alright in my book.

Oh, and the best 3D Zelda is Majora's Mask. Ocarina of Time was Zelda 3D, that is all. Majora's Mask actually tried to change things up and did a good job of it.
Major'as mask was basically leftovers of another project with Zelda slapped on it right away...

Nobody even thinks of that, so I don't like hearing about that game.

Who gives a shit? In the end, it's a LoZ, not the side project it originally was planned to be.
You're clumping it into where it doesn't belong. It, at most, goes with the third timeline brought up by Capcom made Zelda games.
You're making it sound like the Oracles games are shit. If that's what you're suggesting, GTFO.
I am suggesting they are shit.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on June 02, 2007, 09:52:11 AM
y/n
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: Ezloﺕ on June 02, 2007, 09:59:33 AM
I will buy it once it comes out.

I loved Windwaker.
Title: Re: Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Post by: mariofreak55 on June 03, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
Quote from: UnagiPower on May 30, 2007, 05:03:44 PM
I don't know too much about the 3-D Zeldas, but Wind Waker was the only game that was fun enough for me to finish. When I played Ocarina Of Time and Twilight Princess I quickly lost interest. I never played Majora's Mask  emo;
Are we twins?

psyduck;