Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: on December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM

Poll
Question: which do you prefer for communication?
Option 1: email votes: 7
Option 2: twitter, facebook, etc votes: 8
Title: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: russell on April 11, 2009, 04:49:53 PM
So I just saw this on Digg:

Quote
Every communications medium has its own costs and benefits. But with e-mail, the costs grow over time as the benefits shrink. It's now just an easy way for everyone and anyone to waste your time and steal your attention. Here's how to stop using e-mail, and replace it with newer, better forms of communication.


I am thinking, "what? why would I want to get rid of email and what are these 'better' forms of communication?" I have the opposite feelings about Twitter's recent takeover of everything and other evolving communication standards... I want to rid my life of them and consolidate them into email. Facebook is fucking annoying, it's nice for stalking people, but I really would rather just have a list of people's email addresses. Twitter is somewhat irrelevant since it's like RSS for people with short attention spans who don't know how to use RSS, but the point is I don't see what's wrong with email, and I definitely can't comprehend removing it from my workflow.

Am I old-fashioned or does anyone else feel this way.  akudood;

Also this thread isn't about the merits of Facebook or Twitter, I just used them as examples because they're popular.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Zach on April 11, 2009, 04:51:05 PM
I still prefer email as my primary way to communicate online.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Tomboh on April 11, 2009, 04:56:02 PM
i barely ever use email
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: ME## on April 11, 2009, 04:58:54 PM
Twitter makes absolutely no sense to me, I don't see why anyone cares about it.


And I wouldn't say that you're old fashioned.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Daddy on April 11, 2009, 05:07:46 PM
E-mail for more professional matters.
Social networking for personal.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: strongbad on April 11, 2009, 05:10:40 PM
Quote from: ra-ˈkün on April 11, 2009, 05:07:46 PM
E-mail for more professional matters.
Social networking for personal.

Same here buddy
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Feynman on April 11, 2009, 05:12:00 PM
Quote from: ra-ˈkün on April 11, 2009, 05:07:46 PM
E-mail for more professional matters.
Social networking for personal.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Nyerp on April 11, 2009, 05:45:31 PM
n/a
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Wrench on April 11, 2009, 08:03:38 PM
I really don't care for email. Facebook is very nice for me.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: superclucky on April 11, 2009, 08:05:34 PM
i check my email once per month

i rely on IM ;_;
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: NOA_Haunted on April 11, 2009, 08:57:38 PM
I've never sent an e-mail to anyone, ever.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Lotos on April 12, 2009, 11:28:49 AM
Quote from: ra-ˈkün on April 11, 2009, 05:07:46 PM
E-mail for more professional matters.
Social networking for personal.


Yeah, I'll go with that.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Oh on April 12, 2009, 11:36:48 AM
 I don't understand why people like Twitter, it's basically just facebook statuses. "Lol I just peed""I'm on my way to work""Just saw yellow car"  akudood;
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: me003 on April 13, 2009, 10:02:05 PM
i think if everyone just used AIM again things would be simpler. Im no good at keeping up with these social networking sites
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: bluaki on April 13, 2009, 10:13:27 PM
IM really just makes everything simpler. Email for delayed, longer, professional, or more important messages.
I don't get the popularity of communicating via PM on social networking sites. It really slows things down to have to open casual messages like that through non-ajax web interface. An IM client/protocol with a feature for offline pounce or whatever it's called can completely replace chatting through a PM system.
I'd rather refresh my email box than a typical Myspace or whatever profile to check for new messages if IM isn't an option.
Title: Re: email vs. evolving social website mediums
Post by: Hiro on April 13, 2009, 10:16:00 PM
Facebook isn't really for communicating but just socializing and keeping in touch with old friends. I hate aim, but instant messaging is good for conversations. Email is nice, but mostly for professional stuff like bluaki said. I enjoy text messaging.