Boyah Forums

General => The Lobby => Topic started by: Kalahari Inkantation on May 23, 2007, 07:19:39 PM

Title: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on May 23, 2007, 07:19:39 PM
y/n
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 23, 2007, 07:20:19 PM
GOOD POINT.

Pm that to the NOA's.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: 6M69I69B9 on May 23, 2007, 07:42:42 PM
It's the NOAs... They're really homos  edumacate; ...
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 07:44:24 PM
...

You guys are fucking idiots.

Women got boobs. For TITTYFUCKING. Only FAT men come close.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Kalahari Inkantation on May 23, 2007, 07:47:05 PM
y/n
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 08:04:36 PM
Quote from: HUNTER FANTRON on May 23, 2007, 07:47:05 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 07:44:24 PM
...

You guys are http://starcraft2.com/ idiots.

Women got boobs. For TITTYFUCKING. Only FAT men come close.

UM HULLO tittyz r 4 feedin' babeez  educate;
Oh my god, they don't want us to have kids, they want babies to starve!

LET'S SUE THEM!
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Samus Aran on May 23, 2007, 08:10:16 PM
Women's breasts are considered to be sexually appealing and a sex symbol in general, thus they are not allowed. PRETTY OBVIOUS SHIT RIGHT THERE.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 23, 2007, 08:10:50 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:10:16 PM
Women's breasts are considered to be sexually appealing and a sex symbol in general, thus they are not allowed. PRETTY OBVIOUS SHIT RIGHT THERE.


Do men's chests not stimulate women?
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Samus Aran on May 23, 2007, 08:11:24 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 08:10:50 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:10:16 PM
Women's breasts are considered to be sexually appealing and a sex symbol in general, thus they are not allowed. PRETTY OBVIOUS SHIT RIGHT THERE.


Do men's chests not stimulate women?


Not usually, because most men aren't buff.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 23, 2007, 08:14:31 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:11:24 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 08:10:50 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:10:16 PM
Women's breasts are considered to be sexually appealing and a sex symbol in general, thus they are not allowed. PRETTY OBVIOUS SHIT RIGHT THERE.


Do men's chests not stimulate women?


Not usually, because most men aren't buff.


"Most men aren't buff"?

Where did you acquire this statistic? And the men in his sig are buff, so they shouldn't be allowed.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Samus Aran on May 23, 2007, 08:15:55 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 08:14:31 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:11:24 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 08:10:50 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:10:16 PM
Women's breasts are considered to be sexually appealing and a sex symbol in general, thus they are not allowed. PRETTY OBVIOUS SHIT RIGHT THERE.


Do men's chests not stimulate women?


Not usually, because most men aren't buff.


"Most men aren't buff"?

Where did you acquire this statistic? And the men in his sig are buff, so they shouldn't be allowed.


That's not a statistic, it's a fact and you know it. The world isn't Hollywood.  psyduck;

And as for his sig, I really don't care. The fact of the matter is that men's chests are not recognized as sexual the same way women's are. Deal with it.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 23, 2007, 08:21:27 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:15:55 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 08:14:31 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:11:24 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 08:10:50 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 23, 2007, 08:10:16 PM
Women's breasts are considered to be sexually appealing and a sex symbol in general, thus they are not allowed. PRETTY OBVIOUS SHIT RIGHT THERE.


Do men's chests not stimulate women?


Not usually, because most men aren't buff.


"Most men aren't buff"?

Where did you acquire this statistic? And the men in his sig are buff, so they shouldn't be allowed.


That's not a statistic, it's a fact and you know it. The world isn't Hollywood.  psyduck;

And as for his sig, I really don't care. The fact of the matter is that men's chests are not recognized as sexual the same way women's are. Deal with it.


I know nothing. Oh, and I have already dealt with it. It doesn't bother me. I just felt like conversing with someone.


I'M SO LONELY.  gonk;
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:04:09 PM
Dude, ANYBODY likes Boobs, hardly anyone likes a man's chest.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 23, 2007, 09:05:01 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:04:09 PM
Dude, ANYBODY likes Boobs, hardly anyone likes a man's chest.


I am convinced you're a retard.  v;
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:08:08 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 09:05:01 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:04:09 PM
Dude, ANYBODY likes Boobs, hardly anyone likes a man's chest.


I am convinced you're a retard.  v;
I'm not gonna groove to a fat man's gut, am I? Fucking moobs, ew. If the guy were buff like, I dunno, and I were a girl ,then most likely.

If I were a guy, it wouldn't matter as long as they're tits. This is PROVEN by the show called SONS OF BUTCHER
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 23, 2007, 09:12:52 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:08:08 PM
Quote from: V on May 23, 2007, 09:05:01 PM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:04:09 PM
Dude, ANYBODY likes Boobs, hardly anyone likes a man's chest.


I am convinced you're a retard.  v;
I'm not gonna groove to a fat man's gut, am I? Fucking moobs, ew. If the guy were buff like, I dunno, and I were a girl ,then most likely.

If I were a guy, it wouldn't matter as long as they're tits. This is PROVEN by the show called SONS OF BUTCHER


Nope, still retarded.  v;
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:18:49 PM
What makes you say that?  I don't die with a simple passing of the knife.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: V on May 24, 2007, 04:21:21 AM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:18:49 PM
What makes you say that?  I don't die with a simple passing of the knife.


...what the fuck are you talking about?
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 24, 2007, 06:12:45 AM
Quote from: V on May 24, 2007, 04:21:21 AM
Quote from: SBKT on May 23, 2007, 09:18:49 PM
What makes you say that?  I don't die with a simple passing of the knife.


...what the fuck are you talking about?
Ugh, fuck. Don't call me a retard if you don't get the joke.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: ClassicTyler on May 24, 2007, 10:12:11 AM
I don't mind one bit.  awesome;
BUT! To be fair, if he can show those, I don't see why straight people can't have boobies showing.

He needs to take them off if that is the case.  edumacate;
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Bushy on May 24, 2007, 11:06:54 AM
Quote from: ClassicTyler on May 24, 2007, 10:12:11 AM
I don't mind one bit.  awesome;
BUT! To be fair, if he can show those, I don't see why straight people can't have boobies showing.

He needs to take them off if that is the case.  edumacate;
Of course you don't awesome;

Or at least a woman's ass
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: CruelPleasure on May 24, 2007, 11:10:18 AM
Yeah, we need tits in out sigs.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: SBKT on May 24, 2007, 01:40:07 PM
Quote from: acisthebest on May 24, 2007, 11:10:18 AM
Yeah, we need tits in out sigs.
I got a DOLL in my sig. Plastic tits ftl.
Title: Re: WTF SEXIST
Post by: Feynman on May 24, 2007, 04:49:52 PM
Having a girl show her boobs is equivalent to a man showing his penis.