its so awsum.
lawlz and i diskus it last nite
THE THIRD DIMENSION IS NOT A SLICE OF THE FOURTH, GODDAMNIT.
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 02:20:13 PM
THE THIRD DIMENSION IS NOT A SLICE OF THE FOURTH, GODDAMNIT.
Yah it is
every dimension is a point of the next one
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 23, 2007, 02:28:31 PM
Yah it is
every dimension is a point of the next one
matter !=time
They combine to form more complex planes of existence and whatnot; much like ingredients in a delicious pie. Take out the delicious cherries, and you're left with a biscuit. Take out the eggs and milk and you're left with flour and all that other dry stuff
If it was a slice, then once slice would be delicious cherry pie and another solid titanium..
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 02:31:12 PM
matter !=time
They combine to form more complex planes of existence and whatnot; much like ingredients in a delicious pie. Take out the delicious cherries, and you're left with a biscuit. Take out the eggs and milk and you're left with flour and all that other dry stuff
If it was a slice, then once slice would be delicious cherry pie and another solid titanium..
Consider being a science teacher.
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 02:31:12 PM
matter !=time
They combine to form more complex planes of existence and whatnot; much like ingredients in a delicious pie. Take out the delicious cherries, and you're left with a biscuit. Take out the eggs and milk and you're left with flour and all that other dry stuff
If it was a slice, then once slice would be delicious cherry pie and another solid titanium..
the third dimension isn't matter either.
THE FIRST 3 DIMENSIONS ARE SPACIAL DIMENSIONS.
lawlz just doesn't understand stufz
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 02:37:41 PM
the third dimension isn't matter either.
THE FIRST 3 DIMENSIONS ARE SPACIAL DIMENSIONS.
lawlz just doesn't understand stufz
BUT EVERYTHING IN THIS DIMENSION THAT EXISTS IS COMPOSED OF MATTER OF PHOTONS OR OTHER CRAZY SHIT
ie stuff that physically exists
Time is a concept, so if anything, it would be the recipe for the pie.
also i wanted to say something like measurement of space or something but i didn't want to use the word dimension and wanted to try explaining it in some way or whatever but it appears that failed
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 02:40:32 PM
BUT EVERYTHING IN THIS DIMENSION THAT EXISTS IS COMPOSED OF MATTER OF PHOTONS OR OTHER CRAZY SHIT
ie stuff that physically exists
Time is a concept, so if anything, it would be the recipe for the pie.
also i wanted to say something like measurement of space or something but i didn't want to use the word dimension and wanted to try explaining it in some way or whatever but it appears that failed
stop using pie as an example for how you understand how dimensions work. That's why you can't understand anything.
http://www.tenthdimension.com/medialinks.php
watch that. it's not entirely what I'm trying to say since it talks about folds, and i'm talking about infinitely thin slices, but you can't stop thinking about pie.
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 02:42:39 PM
stop using pie as an example for how you understand how dimensions work. That's why you can't understand anything.
http://www.tenthdimension.com/medialinks.php
watch that. it's not entirely what I'm trying to say since it talks about folds, and i'm talking about infinitely thin slices, but you can't stop thinking about pie.
BECAUSE PIES ARE CUT INTO SLICES GODDAMN
Also, I've watched it. Do you measure how large an object is in minutes and seconds? no because spacial area filled or whatever isn't the same as time but instead combine to form a higher level of existence or another dimension but it's possible to measure how long it takes to build a house of a specific size
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 02:46:04 PM
BECAUSE PIES ARE CUT INTO SLICES GODDAMN
Also, I've watched it. Do you measure how large an object is in minutes and seconds? no because spacial area filled or whatever isn't the same as time but instead combine to form a higher level of existence or another dimension but it's possible to measure how long it takes to build a house of a specific size
NOT INFINITELY THIN SLICES. STOP USING PIE
YOU'RE TOO BUSY THINKING OF DIMENSIONS AS ALL CONSUMING PHYSICAL SPACE. STOP AND JUST LISTEN.
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 02:57:59 PM
NOT INFINITELY THIN SLICES. STOP USING PIE
YOU'RE TOO BUSY THINKING OF DIMENSIONS AS ALL CONSUMING PHYSICAL SPACE. STOP AND JUST LISTEN.
NO, NOT ALL DIMENSIONS SIMPLY ADD ANOTHER DEGREE OF CONSUMING SPACE. WHEN YOU SAY SLICE, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SPACE SOMETHING OCCUPIES. TIME !=A SLICE, GODDAMNIT
also what if you bring a pie into the second dimension asshole would it be divided into infinitely thing slices or would it still be a whole pie yes itd be a slice now what if you bring that pie into the fourth dimension it's still the same pie right supposedly yes bring it into the fifth dimension and it should still remain the same pie nothing is added or subtracted
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 03:02:01 PM
NO, NOT ALL DIMENSIONS SIMPLY ADD ANOTHER DEGREE OF CONSUMING SPACE. WHEN YOU SAY SLICE, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SPACE SOMETHING OCCUPIES. TIME !=A SLICE, GODDAMNIT
also what if you bring a pie into the second dimension asshole would it be divided into infinitely thing slices or would it still be a whole pie yes itd be a slice now what if you bring that pie into the fourth dimension it's still the same pie right supposedly yes bring it into the fifth dimension and it should still remain the same pie nothing is added or subtracted
im not using slice as a physical amount of space. its what it would appear to be. so a 3d object an a specific time is an infinitely thin slice(cross section if u want other wordz) of what it would would be in time. you're viewing it as an exact moment
nothing is added or subtracted from anything.
snorkel is able to understand
tomboh can understand
even selkie can
why can't you
also trying to explain abstract concepts to you has the effect on my brain that trying to pump a vacuum(as in empty not the rug cleaner) would have on the pump.
The best way to think of higher dimensions is like...
Think of someone in a 2D world. Something like having a digestive system would be impossible, because it would physically split them in half (think of it like drawing someone on a piece of paper, and that being their entire existence).
For this 2D person to be thrust into our 3D world would be completely baffling, and their head would probably explode in confusion.
Now think of going between our humble 3rd dimension and higher ones like this. We can't possibly understand.
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 03:06:55 PM
im not using slice as a physical amount of space. its what it would appear to be. so a 3d object an a specific time is an infinitely thin slice(cross section if u want other wordz) of what it would would be in time. you're viewing it as an exact moment
i get what you're saying but the problem is i don't see putting everything as an infinitely thin slice as a way of explaining all dimensions psyduck;
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 03:06:55 PMsnorkel is able to understand
tomboh can understand
even selkie can
why can't you
or maybe all of you are wrong
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 03:15:49 PM
i get what you're saying but the problem is i don't see putting everything as an infinitely thin slice as a way of explaining all dimensions psyduck;
only up to the 4th.
after that things get confusing.
Quote
or maybe all of you are wrong
and string theory too
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 03:21:30 PM
and string theory too
cherry pie theory is indisputable
I like butts
Space and time are so confusing to me. I love it. magician;
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 02:37:41 PM
THE FIRST 3 DIMENSIONS ARE SPACIAL DIMENSIONS.
what makes them the first psyduck;
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 03:21:30 PM
and string theory too
i can see that
Quote from: Commodore Guff on November 23, 2007, 03:50:55 PM
what makes them the first psyduck;
their name.
they are called the first, second, and third dimension.
sure they would still be the same if they were called the red, pink, and maroon dimensions.
ask science.
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 03:59:39 PM
their name.
they are called the first, second, and third dimension.
sure they would still be the same if they were called the red, pink, and maroon dimensions.
ask science.
no because a pink shape isn't necessarily the same as a 3d figure :|
you know what ive always wanted to know
how does the 1st dimension work
If a 2D figure in the 2nd dimension turns to the side, there is absolutely nothing there. Its side is nonexistent. So is the first dimension nothing? psyduck;
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 04:00:52 PM
no because a pink shape isn't necessarily the same as a 3d figure :|
it would still be what we perceive as 3d if it had another name.
if we called shoes bintires they would still go one our feet.
Quote from: PHANTOM PHANTRON on November 23, 2007, 04:02:55 PM
you know what ive always wanted to know
how does the 1st dimension work
If a 2D figure in the 2nd dimension turns to the side, there is absolutely nothing there. Its side is nonexistent. So is the first dimension nothing? psyduck;
First dimension is a point. We would not physically be able to se what it's like in that point, but I think of it like being stuck in a very small box, so you can't move at all.
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 04:04:40 PM
it would still be what we perceive as 3d if it had another name.
if we called shoes bintires they would still go one our feet.
fuck i lol'd
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 04:04:40 PM
it would still be what we perceive as 3d if it had another name.
if we called shoes bintires they would still go one our feet.
The amount of metaphors in this thread is getting as ridiculous as a camel walking upside down on a 4th dimension.
Quote from: PHANTOM PHANTRON on November 23, 2007, 04:02:55 PM
you know what ive always wanted to know
how does the 1st dimension work
If a 2D figure in the 2nd dimension turns to the side, there is absolutely nothing there. Its side is nonexistent. So is the first dimension nothing? psyduck;
if an object could turn to its side i'd assume that'd mean it would enter an entirely new universe but how could something live in the second dimension and how could it see how the hell would light work if at all etc
no one could really know seeing as how none of our universal laws of physics or anything like that apply to the second dimension
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 04:04:40 PM
it would still be what we perceive as 3d if it had another name.
if we called shoes bintires they would still go one our feet.
2d=x+y 3d=2D+z :|
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 23, 2007, 04:05:22 PM
First dimension is a point. We would not physically be able to se what it's like in that point, but I think of it like being stuck in a very small box, so you can't move at all.
Boxes are three dimensional figures and according to that video the first dimension is a single line
LOSE
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 23, 2007, 04:06:47 PM
The amount of metaphors in this thread is getting as ridiculous as a camel walking upside down on a 4th dimension.
That's a simile. :|
And some camels do live in Australia.
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 04:08:36 PM
Boxes are three dimensional figures and according to that video the first dimension is a single line
LOSE
IT WAS A CRAPPY EXAMPLE GOD DAMMIT
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 04:09:31 PM
That's a simile. :|
And some camels do live in Australia.
K, this thread is now officially about 3rd grade grammar.
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 23, 2007, 04:10:29 PM
K, this thread is now officially about 3rd grade grammar.
Nice hyperbole.
Metaphors and similes aren't discussed in third grade.
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 04:16:21 PM
Nice hyperbole.
Metaphors and similes aren't discussed in third grade.
when are they discussed?
Possibly 4th?
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 23, 2007, 04:17:05 PM
when are they discussed?
Possibly 4th?
They tought them to me in 8th. ness;
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 04:16:21 PM
Nice hyperbole.
Metaphors and similes aren't discussed in third grade.
7th for me
WTF are metaphors and similes lololololololol edumacate;
Quote from: JMV290 on November 23, 2007, 03:59:39 PM
their name.
they are called the first, second, and third dimension.
sure they would still be the same if they were called the red, pink, and maroon dimensions.
what are they
Quote from: IPWNEDURMOM on November 23, 2007, 05:18:07 PM
WTF are metaphors and similes lololololololol edumacate;
Metaphor: Your butt is a mountain
Simile: Your butt is like a mountain
Quote from: Super Mario Galaxy on November 23, 2007, 05:24:28 PM
Metaphor: Your butt is a mountain
Simile: Your butt is like a mountain
I am a mountain. :|
Quote from: Lawlz on November 23, 2007, 05:25:19 PM
I am a mountain. :|
a mountain of gooey gumdrop goodness :|
Quote from: Speedykaz on November 23, 2007, 05:28:11 PM
a mountain of gooey gumdrop goodness :|
But only in a slice of the fifth dimension. :|