I'd give it to...
You know... Classic rock? The period of rock albums from the late 60s to the mid 80s? Got it? Good? Yeah.
Well, my favorite classic rock album is...
(http://www.barbarakrakowgallery.com/stuff/contentmgr/files/6572e9720038f68d1d96d08e1a35f109/img_two/lp_frank.exileonmainstreet.jpg)
It's the Rolling Stones' most mis-mash, rambling collision of musicial genres into one album. This album has so many damn different genres in it with rock, country, gospel, blues and R & B. That's in part what makes the album so good. The album is so random and disjointed that when it goes from Southern soul (Let It Loose) to electric blues (Stop Breaking Down), you're never bored. It just goes from genre to genre. I love it.
It also has my favorite Rolling Stones songs on Exile on Main St. Tumbling Dice, Let It Loose, Casino Boogie, Rocks Off (Dude, I listen to this song everytime I get in my car. I love this song, man... LOVE IT.), Shake Your Hips, Stop Breaking Down, Turd on the Run, Sweet Virgina, Shine a Light, and Torn and Frayed. Of course, that's not saying the other songs on the album are bad. They're actually quite good. I'm just saying which songs I really love.
This is the pinnacle of the Rolling Stones in my mind. Nothing else they've done has come close to Exile on Main St. Not even Let It Bleed or Sticky Fingers can match how powerful and fun this album truly is. Oh and the only reason why David Bowie doesn't have my favorite classic rock album is because I don't really consider Low or Hunky Dory classic rock. I'm not sure which genre Hunky Dory falls in my mind... Whatever. Anyway, Exile on Main St... Awesome.
All other answers are incorrect. flower;
I'll go with you, because I'm not knowledgable with this sort of thing.
Quote from: SBKT on May 27, 2007, 05:35:30 PM
I'll go with you, because I'm not knowledgable with this sort of thing.
Quote from: SBKT on May 27, 2007, 05:35:30 PM
I'll go with you, because I'm not knowledgable with this sort of thing.
GO LISTEN TO IT argh;
Houses of the Holy by Led Zeppelin
Quote from: Kaz on May 27, 2007, 06:11:37 PM
Houses of the Holy by Led Zeppelin
Not one of my favorite Zep albums. I find Physical Graffiti and Led Zeppelin IV to be superior.
Define late 60s and early 90s. Anything past 65 to 95?
Quote from: Andrew1911 on May 27, 2007, 06:16:03 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 27, 2007, 06:11:37 PM
Houses of the Holy by Led Zeppelin
Not one of my favorite Zep albums. I find Physical Graffiti and Led Zeppelin IV to be superior.
IV isn't that high for me. I'm really not too fond of "Four Sticks" or "Battle of Evermore." Physical Graffiti, however, is amazing. It's my second favorite.
1.) Houses
2.) Physical
3.) I
4.) II
5.) IV
6.) III
7.) In Through
8.) Coda
9.) Presence
That's just the studio albums of course. BBC Sessions is also great, and of course How the West Was Won deserves some mention as well.
Quote from: Kaz on May 27, 2007, 08:52:28 PM
Quote from: Andrew1911 on May 27, 2007, 06:16:03 PM
Quote from: Kaz on May 27, 2007, 06:11:37 PM
Houses of the Holy by Led Zeppelin
Not one of my favorite Zep albums. I find Physical Graffiti and Led Zeppelin IV to be superior.
IV isn't that high for me. I'm really not too fond of "Four Sticks" or "Battle of Evermore." Physical Graffiti, however, is amazing. It's my second favorite.
1.) Houses
2.) Physical
3.) I
4.) II
5.) IV
6.) III
7.) In Through
8.) Coda
9.) Presence
That's just the studio albums of course. BBC Sessions is also great, and of course How the West Was Won deserves some mention as well.
I second that list, but a few changes:
1.) Houses
2.) Physical
3.) III
4.) II
5.) I
6.) IV
7.) In Through
8.) Coda
9.) Presence
What can I say, I hate the recordings of the songs on Zeppelin IV, save When The Levee Breaks. All of the tunes sound better live.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v251/slomojoe/06trout1.jpg[/img]
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
You say that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:08:05 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
You say that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I am saying that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90s. ;)
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:08:05 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
You say that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I am saying that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90s. ;)
So, tell me about how rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:11:14 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:08:05 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
You say that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I am saying that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90s. ;)
So, tell me about how rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I fail to understand this as well. I can name about 10 good bands from the 90s off of the top of my head.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:12:49 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:11:14 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:08:05 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
You say that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I am saying that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90s. ;)
So, tell me about how rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I fail to understand this as well. I can name about 10 good bands from the 90s off of the top of my head.
Oasis? Huge. Smashing Pumpkins? Huge. Rock was alive and well in the 90's.
Oasis, overrated. Smashing Pumpkins, not that good.
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:14:05 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:12:49 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:11:14 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:08:05 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:06:21 PM
Quote from: Houdini on May 27, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:04:04 PM
Nevermind.
LOL FLAME MAH PLZ LOL
Okay, I'll take that challenge. Nirvana isn't classic rock.
But they did help rock survive the 90s. v;
You say that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I am saying that as if rock had trouble surviving the 90s. ;)
So, tell me about how rock had trouble surviving the 90's.
I fail to understand this as well. I can name about 10 good bands from the 90s off of the top of my head.
Oasis? Huge. Smashing Pumpkins? Huge. Rock was alive and well in the 90's.
Blur, Radiohead, Supergrass, Kula Shaker, The Verve, Pulp...
Not to mention bands that formed in the 80s, but were their biggest in the 90s such as The Manic Street Preachers and Primal Scream. That's not even counting American bands.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:15:01 PM
Oasis, overrated. Smashing Pumpkins, not that good.
1. Do tell why they are overrated.
2. GTFO
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, but I'm curious.
I'm not much of an Oasis fan myself, but the point is that they were really popular.
You get a few points for liking Radiohead, but I'm going to go on a limb and guess that you mainly like The Bends and OK Computer and don't like their more recent stuff like Amnesiac and Hail to the Thief.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, mainly because you don't like Oasis, but I'm curious.
I've heard Wonder Wall, Rock 'n Roll Star, Half the World Away, etc. Do I have to list every one i've heard?
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, mainly because you don't like Oasis, but I'm curious.
I've heard Wonder Wall, Rock 'n Roll Star, Half the World Away, etc. Do I have to list every one i've heard?
Fair enough, at least you have a chance.
However, that is besides the point. I still fail to see how rock had "trouble surviving" in the 90s. Just because you don't like the bands doesn't mean it had trouble surviving at all.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:23:36 PM
I still fail to see how rock had "trouble surviving" in the 90s. Just because you don't like the bands doesn't mean it had trouble surviving at all.
You took the words right out of my mouth.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:23:36 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, mainly because you don't like Oasis, but I'm curious.
I've heard Wonder Wall, Rock 'n Roll Star, Half the World Away, etc. Do I have to list every one i've heard?
Fair enough, at least you have a chance.
However, that is besides the point. I still fail to see how rock had "trouble surviving" in the 90s. Just because you don't like the bands doesn't mean it had trouble surviving at all.
Oasis isn't rock, it's pop. There, I said it. True classic rock doesn't sound that way.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:23:36 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, mainly because you don't like Oasis, but I'm curious.
I've heard Wonder Wall, Rock 'n Roll Star, Half the World Away, etc. Do I have to list every one i've heard?
Fair enough, at least you have a chance.
However, that is besides the point. I still fail to see how rock had "trouble surviving" in the 90s. Just because you don't like the bands doesn't mean it had trouble surviving at all.
Oasis isn't rock, it's pop. There, I said it. True classic rock doesn't sound that way.
So you're saying The Beatles aren't classic rock?
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:25:21 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:23:36 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, mainly because you don't like Oasis, but I'm curious.
I've heard Wonder Wall, Rock 'n Roll Star, Half the World Away, etc. Do I have to list every one i've heard?
Fair enough, at least you have a chance.
However, that is besides the point. I still fail to see how rock had "trouble surviving" in the 90s. Just because you don't like the bands doesn't mean it had trouble surviving at all.
Oasis isn't rock, it's pop. There, I said it. True classic rock doesn't sound that way.
So you're saying The Beatles aren't classic rock?
Some of there songs are, some of them aren't.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:26:59 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:25:21 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:23:36 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:18:03 PM
Speaking of that list, Radiohead is the only great band to me there.
Oasis is overrated because they aren't that special, there music doesn't have much of a meaning, at least to me anyway. I just don't see what the big deal is.
What have you heard by them? I've already come to the conclusion that you have no soul, mainly because you don't like Oasis, but I'm curious.
I've heard Wonder Wall, Rock 'n Roll Star, Half the World Away, etc. Do I have to list every one i've heard?
Fair enough, at least you have a chance.
However, that is besides the point. I still fail to see how rock had "trouble surviving" in the 90s. Just because you don't like the bands doesn't mean it had trouble surviving at all.
Oasis isn't rock, it's pop. There, I said it. True classic rock doesn't sound that way.
So you're saying The Beatles aren't classic rock?
Some of there songs are, some of them aren't.
The Beatles are pop, face it.
Pop=Popular, goddamnit. The Beatles are rock/pop. Oasis have more songs that could be considered "rock" than The Beatles. Not to mention, I didn't ask what you consider rock and what you consider pop. The majority considers Oasis rock, I'm going by that. You're avoiding the question.
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
It didn't do as well as pop or hip-hop, dammit. That's what I was trying to say.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:34:43 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
It didn't do as well as pop or hip-hop, dammit. That's what I was trying to say.
It didn't? I'm sorry, I DIDN'T KNOW 250,000 FANS IN TWO CONCERTS WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE FASTEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE 3RD BEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. Your ignorance is killing me. Even then, I didn't know you judged music based on sales and not quality. Sorry, I usually go by the latter.
I suppose you would say rock is still in trouble now?
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:34:43 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
It didn't do as well as pop or hip-hop, dammit. That's what I was trying to say.
It didn't? I'm sorry, I DIDN'T KNOW 250,000 FANS IN TWO CONCERTS WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE FASTEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE 3RD BEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. Your ignorance is killing me. Even then, I didn't know you judged music based on sales and not quality. Sorry, I usually go by the latter.
I suppose you would say rock is still in trouble now?
Sorry for having a different opinion. ;) Rock is doing a tad bit better, since all the oldies decided to go on tour. Also, Foo Fighters is still around.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:38:57 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:34:43 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
It didn't do as well as pop or hip-hop, dammit. That's what I was trying to say.
It didn't? I'm sorry, I DIDN'T KNOW 250,000 FANS IN TWO CONCERTS WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE FASTEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE 3RD BEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. Your ignorance is killing me. Even then, I didn't know you judged music based on sales and not quality. Sorry, I usually go by the latter.
I suppose you would say rock is still in trouble now?
Sorry for having a different opinion. ;) Rock is doing a tad bit better, since all the oldies decided to go on tour. Also, Foo Fighters is still around.
You mean the meteorites didn't kill them all?
Sorry, that's dinosaurs. Kind of the same thing though.
Oh, and it's alright. I understand some people have shit taste in music, it's no big deal.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:39:54 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:38:57 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:34:43 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
It didn't do as well as pop or hip-hop, dammit. That's what I was trying to say.
It didn't? I'm sorry, I DIDN'T KNOW 250,000 FANS IN TWO CONCERTS WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE FASTEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE 3RD BEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. Your ignorance is killing me. Even then, I didn't know you judged music based on sales and not quality. Sorry, I usually go by the latter.
I suppose you would say rock is still in trouble now?
Sorry for having a different opinion. ;) Rock is doing a tad bit better, since all the oldies decided to go on tour. Also, Foo Fighters is still around.
You mean the meteorites didn't kill them all?
Sorry, that's dinosaurs. Kind of the same thing though.
I feel bad when I anger people, so I must apologize if I offended you. I just have a different opinion. I hope you don't hate me over this.
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:38:57 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:34:43 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 27, 2007, 10:33:19 PM
Quote from: Fireman.exe on May 27, 2007, 10:30:55 PM
The early era is pop, the late era is rock. I answered the question, I hope it satisfies your cravings of knowledge.
Really, it is pop? I see more hints of early Rock n Roll in The Beatles' early songs then most of their later work, save the bluesy tunes from The White Album.
And no, you didn't answer my question. All you said was "theur overated and nawt rawk". That still doesn't give any backing to your statement that rock was in trouble in the 90s or whatever stupid thing you said.
It didn't do as well as pop or hip-hop, dammit. That's what I was trying to say.
It didn't? I'm sorry, I DIDN'T KNOW 250,000 FANS IN TWO CONCERTS WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE FASTEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. OR HAVING THE 3RD BEST SELLING ALBUM IN BRITAIN WAS BAD. Your ignorance is killing me. Even then, I didn't know you judged music based on sales and not quality. Sorry, I usually go by the latter.
I suppose you would say rock is still in trouble now?
Sorry for having a different opinion. ;) Rock is doing a tad bit better, since all the oldies decided to go on tour. Also, Foo Fighters is still around.
Old shit is not holding up the rock industry.
Weezer rocked the 90s.
Quote from: Andrew1911 on May 28, 2007, 08:35:37 AM
Weezer rocked the 90s.
Anyway, back on topic. Would the years for this thread be 1965-1995?
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 28, 2007, 12:35:24 PM
Quote from: Andrew1911 on May 28, 2007, 08:35:37 AM
Weezer rocked the 90s.
Anyway, back on topic. Would the years for this thread be 1965-1995?
Hell to the no. I edited it back a bit to the mid 80s.
Then, my list would be...
Revolver-The Beatles
Pet Sounds-The Beach Boys
Something Else By The Kinks-The Kinks
Houses of The Holy-Led Zeppelin
A Night At The Opera-Queen
Through The Past Darkly (Big Hits Vol. 2)-The Rolling Stones (Though, if I had to choose a full album, I would go with Aftermath)
Meaty Beaty Big and Bouncy or Live At Leeds (The original 6 track LP)-The Who
I'd like to mention more bands, but I'm unsure of what album to pick.
Are you Experienced?- The Jimi Hendrix Experience
Beatles Red Album
Quote from: ONEMANFREAKSHOW on May 31, 2007, 02:36:57 AM
Beatles Red Album
Beatles Abby Road and I haven't seen you post in a long time.
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 28, 2007, 09:56:00 PM
Revolver-The Beatles
Definitely my favorite Beatles album. It was quite possibly the one time in their career when each member of the band was at his peak.
Quote from: Kaz on May 31, 2007, 08:48:00 AM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on May 28, 2007, 09:56:00 PM
Revolver-The Beatles
Definitely my favorite Beatles album. It was quite possibly the one time in their career when each member of the band was at his peak.
The creativity at that time was simply out of this word.
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Physical Graffiti = far superior.
Quote from: Houdini on May 31, 2007, 09:19:55 PM
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Physical Graffiti = far superior.
sure. yes; i havent listend to it in a while.
doh; How could I forget Revolver?
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Well at least this time you didn't drool over Presence. spam;
Yeah, II is a damn good album, but I agree with Houdini. Grafitti is far better. Of course, I consider Houses to be their best...nobody ever agrees with me on that. emo;
Quote from: Kaz on June 01, 2007, 12:00:40 AM
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Well at least this time you didn't drool over Presence. spam;
Yeah, II is a damn good album, but I agree with Houdini. Grafitti is far better. Of course, I consider Houses to be their best...nobody ever agrees with me on that. emo;
I'm nobody? emo;
Quote from: Morning_Glory on June 01, 2007, 04:01:22 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 01, 2007, 12:00:40 AM
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Well at least this time you didn't drool over Presence. spam;
Yeah, II is a damn good album, but I agree with Houdini. Grafitti is far better. Of course, I consider Houses to be their best...nobody ever agrees with me on that. emo;
I'm nobody? emo;
I thought you said Graffiti was their best. psyduck;
Quote from: Kaz on June 01, 2007, 04:15:55 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on June 01, 2007, 04:01:22 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 01, 2007, 12:00:40 AM
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Well at least this time you didn't drool over Presence. spam;
Yeah, II is a damn good album, but I agree with Houdini. Grafitti is far better. Of course, I consider Houses to be their best...nobody ever agrees with me on that. emo;
I'm nobody? emo;
I thought you said Graffiti was their best. psyduck;
I switch between them. Doesn't mean I think either one is better. awesome;
Quote from: Morning_Glory on June 01, 2007, 06:46:04 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 01, 2007, 04:15:55 PM
Quote from: Morning_Glory on June 01, 2007, 04:01:22 PM
Quote from: Kaz on June 01, 2007, 12:00:40 AM
Quote from: Chaos66 on May 31, 2007, 09:18:08 PM
Led Zeppelin 2 i guess. navi;
Well at least this time you didn't drool over Presence. spam;
Yeah, II is a damn good album, but I agree with Houdini. Grafitti is far better. Of course, I consider Houses to be their best...nobody ever agrees with me on that. emo;
I'm nobody? emo;
I thought you said Graffiti was their best. psyduck;
I switch between them. Doesn't mean I think either one is better. awesome;
...okay then. spam;