January 25, 2025, 10:57:15 AM

1,531,387 Posts in 46,736 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


so obama actually ISN'T going to veto NDAA

Started by snoorkel, December 14, 2011, 02:46:06 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Walter


PLEASEHELP1991

I'm voting for [REDACTED]
firm supporter of the australian ballot here
I love [you]

snoorkel

Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 03:35:45 PM
ron paul doesn't believe in seperation of church and state fyi he thinks that it should be "the state's decision" inb4 religious troops patrolling street. that alone is enough for me to not vote for him


not that I really agree with the philosophy of that but I think the idea, in the Paulian philosophy, is to delegate as much power as possible to states. like in an ideal united states (i am aware the articles of confederation existed).

like, sure, alabama can have a governor-bishop, and california can continue to worship money and pot. what's the problem, why should i get to make ethical decisions about people i will never talk to in my life?

Walter


snoorkel

Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 03:55:28 PM
lol


no srs, I don't live in alabama or know anyone there so I don't feel like I should have the right to tell them they shouldn't value religion if they really want to, and I also don't want them making laws about issues that only affect where I live (mexicans and pot). either have no laws, or do this, seems like a viable solution to actually enforce democracy

YPrrrr

Quote from: Twilight Echo on December 14, 2011, 03:40:15 PM
I guess... but he does support the Israeli occupation of Gaza and such so that isn't so great in terms of foreign policy

Doesn't he also emphasize less us support for Israel? Or maybe that was some wonderful dream I had


Walter


Daddy

Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 04:17:27 PM
no srs, I don't live in alabama or know anyone there so I don't feel like I should have the right to tell them they shouldn't value religion if they really want to, and I also don't want them making laws about issues that only affect where I live (mexicans and pot). either have no laws, or do this, seems like a viable solution to actually enforce democracy
But why stop at the state line?


Why should voters in Suffolk County decide the laws here in Essex County?

Why stop at the county?

Why should voters in Salem decide the laws here in Lynn?

City?


Why should voters in That ward decide the laws in this ward?



Not saying that I don't see your point but why is State the threshold for laws when different wards of a city can have variances in their laws?

snoorkel

Quote from: Khadafi on December 14, 2011, 04:47:23 PM
But why stop at the state line?


Why should voters in Suffolk County decide the laws here in Essex County?

Why stop at the county?

Why should voters in Salem decide the laws here in Lynn?

City?


Why should voters in That ward decide the laws in this ward?



Not saying that I don't see your point but why is State the threshold for laws when different wards of a city can have variances in their laws?


I'm actually completely in support of city-states and have always thought that the USA should be divided into 'super states' based roughly on economic regions that join together in some loosely regulated but mutually agreed-upon confederation for purposes of national defense and foreign trade

Walter

Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 04:49:37 PM
I'm actually completely in support of city-states and have always thought that the USA should be divided into 'super states' based roughly on economic regions that join together in some loosely regulated but mutually agreed-upon confederation for purposes of national defense and foreign trade


But what if one city is radical and forms an army and attacks a nearby city? What then Mister? Who will step in to stop it? Give them enough power and its bound to happen somewhere, just look at what the fed does with power. We are invading pretty much every country on the planet.

Daddy

I think the West Texan Union should invade the socali federation because there are so many fags.

snoorkel

Quote from: Walter on December 14, 2011, 04:56:29 PM
But what if one city is radical and forms an army and attacks a nearby city? What then Mister? Who will step in to stop it? Give them enough power and its bound to happen somewhere, just look at what the fed does with power. We are invading pretty much every country on the planet.


obviously I'm not talking about replicating the politics of athens and sparta, someone would have to use their big ol brain to figure out fair and enforceable inter-city regulations that would disencourage civil wars (this shouldn't be difficult considering we have the internet and are no longer concerned with winning land for the sake of raping the native population)

Walter

Quote from: vziard on December 14, 2011, 05:00:20 PM(this shouldn't be difficult considering we have the internet and are no longer concerned with winning land for the sake of raping the native population)


Speak for yourself. AWESOME

snoorkel


Go Up