If there was a disaster and there was no food

russell · October 13, 2008, 06:07:57 PM

pets.

MAYBE human if it was freshly dead.

Hiro · October 13, 2008, 06:09:27 PM

Depends of what type of pet.
If it's a big fish or something, the pet.
If it's a gerbil, the human.

Wrench · October 13, 2008, 07:12:23 PM

Dead person. Both of them are terrible though.

Knig · October 13, 2008, 07:14:16 PM

The disaster made sure there was no food? Inconceivable.

To answer this hypothetical problem, yeah, I'd eat the pet.

superclucky · October 13, 2008, 07:37:15 PM

Get my dog to injure people until they were immobilized and then kill my dog and eat them both.

Hensa · October 13, 2008, 08:10:23 PM

I would never.

V · October 13, 2008, 08:23:32 PM

Both, human first.

:atomsk: · October 13, 2008, 10:05:01 PM

Neither. I would kill my pet so it wouldn't starve, and probably kill myself in someplace dark and secretive like a cave so no one would eat me.
It's like the book 'The Road'. No food, so everyone reverts to cannibalism. It's pretty rad.

If there was a disaster and there was no food

What would you rather eat?

russell

October 13, 2008, 06:07:57 PM #15

Hiro

October 13, 2008, 06:09:27 PM #16

Wrench

October 13, 2008, 07:12:23 PM #17

Knig

October 13, 2008, 07:14:16 PM #18

superclucky

October 13, 2008, 07:37:15 PM #19

Hensa

October 13, 2008, 08:10:23 PM #20

V

October 13, 2008, 08:23:32 PM #21

:atomsk:

October 13, 2008, 10:05:01 PM #22