Message to person who validated the two guests

[ncba93ivyase]

excuse me wtf r u doin

[mariofreak55]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

[Tri4se]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

oh hi

[V]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

[Andrew1911]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

[V]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

[Andrew1911]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

[V]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

We never debated. 

I am talking about you and Milad, right now.

I looked back and we didn't argue, I just read wrongly.

So let me get this straight, your bitching because you're not a mod no more? Milad doesn't want no one moderating the Guest Board, so he took your rank. He wants the staff that is already here to make those decisions. And you feel there should be one person to do that, right?

[Andrew1911]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

We never debated. 

I am talking about you and Milad, right now.

http://forum.boyah.net/index.php?topic=2794.15

[V]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

We never debated. 

I am talking about you and Milad, right now.

http://forum.boyah.net/index.php?topic=2794.15

EDITED POST IS EDITED.

Whatever..I don't really care. If you're mod, ok. If not, whatever...

As long as you validate people, and don't turn them down for dumb shit, Anjew! 

[V]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

You're not just a bad mod, you're a horrible one. I mean look at it, you actually put out a series of intrusive questions based on the guests believed then you critique them on it. You abuse your power for personal reasons, you can't keep your calm, you flame anyone who disagrees with you and you have no qualms about resorting to personal attacks to demolish your opositions ego, whatever the after affect may be. You can't handle your problem by PM but instead make complaint threads about the user suggesting they be banned, you attack individuals who dislike your crappy fan-fics, you carry on grudges for way more than neccessary and your overinflated ego has given you the illusion you are the ultimate film critic.

Oh shit...I will leave on that note.

Burn... burned;

[Andrew1911]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

You're not just a bad mod, you're a horrible one. I mean look at it, you actually put out a series of intrusive questions based on the guests believed then you critique them on it. You abuse your power for personal reasons, you can't keep your calm, you flame anyone who disagrees with you and you have no qualms about resorting to personal attacks to demolish your opositions ego, whatever the after affect may be. You can't handle your problem by PM but instead make complaint threads about the user suggesting they be banned, you attack individuals who dislike your crappy fan-fics, you carry on grudges for way more than neccessary and your overinflated ego has given you the illusion you are the ultimate film critic.

I wanted to see how well they could debate and they all proved to be well so they got in. Abuse my power for personal reasons? What?   So far, I have yet to delete an account in anger, I have yet to delete any member's account here even though I could've, and I could've made myself a head adminstrator and ban the other head adminstrators to take power but I didn't. Hm. If you wanted to solve this problem through PM, you would've PMed me. You didn't so you chose to take it out in this thread. Nice hypocripsy, Ringo.  y;

No one has disliked them, so far, actually. Actually, Ringo, I tried to be nice to you again because I thought you changed and you were going to be a better user than you were in the past. Well, I guess I was wrong when you decided to be a prick to me after I became mod. So, you can burn in hell, you two-faced, backstabbing prick.

Uh, MF isn't telling me to shape up or hit the road. You are. LEARN TO READ, PLZ.

[Andrew1911]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

We never debated. 

I am talking about you and Milad, right now.

I looked back and we didn't argue, I just read wrongly.

So let me get this straight, your bitching because you're not a mod no more? Milad doesn't want no one moderating the Guest Board, so he took your rank. He wants the staff that is already here to make those decisions. And you feel there should be one person to do that, right?

I'm "bitching" because I had no warning when getting de-modded. I was given no valid reason for it.

[V]

Too bad I haven't done anything to show I'm not capable of running validations. If I remember correctly, you complained I was going to allow only 10% of the people who registered in. So far, I've let everyone who's registered and made a thread. Hm. Kinda goes against your "I'm not for the job" thing. Cricizing someone for being a child is not crying.

I never said you weren't fit for the job, (well maybe I did, but I take that back) but I think that it should be left up to people who are already staff.

And this blows, everybody who was siding with me is being a pussy and hiding their asses.  dawkins;

I'm not.  orks;

You're only making his side look worse. If you side with me, you might be able to tank my argument.

I think you should keep your focus on the debate,and not try to flame me for no reason. Because as of now, your arguement is already shit and stupid.

You're not a good moderator. Period.

I did debate you and if I recall, you never responded back. Hm. I guess my argument is sound and yours must have been pretty damn shitty because you never responded. If your last sentence is any proof, it must have been shitty.

We never debated. 

I am talking about you and Milad, right now.

I looked back and we didn't argue, I just read wrongly.

So let me get this straight, your bitching because you're not a mod no more? Milad doesn't want no one moderating the Guest Board, so he took your rank. He wants the staff that is already here to make those decisions. And you feel there should be one person to do that, right?

I'm "bitching" because I had no warning when getting de-modded. I was given no valid reason for it.

Oh, ok. That is understandable.

Whatever the case, I hope you guys work it out. I am off to watch Shin chan. toot;

I am getting tired of all the tension here between members. But, it is to be expected...

[The artist formally known]

This thread is completely worthless, sorry Andrew, I always admired your posts on guest boards

I think this thread should be locked because it's going nowhere and fast