January 08, 2025, 02:29:10 PM

1,531,383 Posts in 46,736 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


Watch this, please.

Started by V, April 17, 2008, 04:30:51 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

V

Quote from: Soup on April 18, 2008, 08:19:43 AM



Look haaaarder.

You were right; Lion King does have a quote for every situation.

Nyerp

Quote from: Socks on April 18, 2008, 07:05:01 AM
What's wrong with that?


Everything, unless it's in pain or is lethal.

Socks

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 12:24:52 PM
Everything, unless it's in pain or is lethal.


It's an animal.

Nyerp


Socks

Quote from: Sonic the Hedgehog on April 18, 2008, 12:34:40 PM
So are you, does that give someone the right to shoot you?


Humans are not comparable to dogs, for obvious reasons. I'm not advocating shooting dogs for no reason but I find the fact that is bothers some people so much when it happens puzzling.


Nyerp

Quote from: Socks on April 18, 2008, 12:38:56 PM
I'm not advocating shooting dogs for no reason but I find the fact that is bothers some people so much when it happens puzzling.


MAYBE BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE DOGS AS PETS AND LOVE THEM AND DOGS ARE ONE OF THE MORE LOVING ANIMALS

I DUNNO

Socks

Shooting someone's pets should be illegal and wrong as that is their material and financial property, and I do not support the destruction of private property. But "love", ok whatever, what "love" is there for just some random animal? If there was a legitimate reason like, endangered species, food supply, etc... then I can see it being illegal but making it illegal or feeling bad because it happens to be a dog? Why not the same standards for a fly? Someone may love flies and feel bad.

Nyerp


Socks


Nyerp


Socks

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 12:55:10 PM
Then you don't know what you're talking about.


Please elaborate this genius point of yours that you are trying to make. I'm clearly against shooting other peoples dogs or pets as that is not your property. Also, I don't need to have had a dog as a pet to arrive at a non emotional and logical conclusion.

Nyerp

FLIES DO NOT GIVE LOVE BACK TO YOU

YOU DO NOT GET ATTACHED TO FLIES

FLIES DO NOT DEPEND ON YOU

DO YOU GET IT NOW?

Socks

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 12:59:46 PM
FLIES DO NOT GIVE LOVE BACK TO YOU


I disagree, a fly gives as much love back as a stray dog or wild cat does.

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 12:59:46 PM
YOU DO NOT GET ATTACHED TO FLIES


Who are you to say? I personally get very attacked to flies, therefore their evil killing should be made illegal and immoral.

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 12:59:46 PM
FLIES DO NOT DEPEND ON YOU


Flies overwhelmingly depend on waste and or materials directly or indirectly cause by human activity. In any case stray dogs do not depend on you either, both species (non domesticated dog breed) have been around longer then modern humans.

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 12:59:46 PM
DO YOU GET IT NOW?


That purely emotional decisions nor based on logic and reasoning are a circular pattern in idiocy? Yeah I think so.

Nyerp

I'M TALKING ABOUT A DOG YOU OWN

Quote from: Socks on April 18, 2008, 01:04:26 PM
Who are you to say? I personally get very attacked to flies, therefore their evil killing should be made illegal and immoral.

what

IF YOU OWN A FLY, YOU CAN NOT LOVE IT

Socks

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 01:07:36 PM
I'M TALKING ABOUT A DOG YOU OWN


Then you are a moron since I clearly stated from post one that I do not agree with killing other peoples dogs or pets.

Quote from: Nyerp on April 18, 2008, 01:07:36 PM
what

IF YOU OWN A FLY, YOU CAN NOT LOVE IT


You're not making sense, I love all flies even if I owned one.

Go Up