January 12, 2025, 06:24:11 PM

1,531,385 Posts in 46,736 Topics by 1,523 Members
› View the most recent posts on the forum.


Pure bullshit

Started by Nyerp, October 01, 2007, 12:25:53 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down

Nyerp

My school says we can't cite Wiki for anything ever. They pretend all the entries are written by juvenile fuckwits and that the site can't be trusted.

Fukken tards don't understand anything. argh;

guff

That is somewhat reasonable.  Encyclopedias in general shouldn't be used as sources.

just use the references the article cites

also wikipedia has been blocked completely in our school district so stop whining

Nyerp

Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 01, 2007, 12:27:51 PM
That is somewhat reasonable.  Encyclopedias in general shouldn't be used as sources.

just use the references the article cites

also wikipedia has been blocked completely in our school district so stop whining

Well of course you're expected to get multiple sources and compare them to each other.

Also Wikipedia is a summary of the things it cites.

guff

Quote from: Nyerp on October 01, 2007, 12:34:13 PM
Well of course you're expected to get multiple sources and compare them to each other.

Also Wikipedia is a summary of the things it cites.
ok

In a perfect world, yes.  But it's more of a compilation of the writers' knowledge rather than that of a digest of reputed sources.  For particularly controversial claims, yes, sources must be used.  But the majority of statements are not backed by references.

~Fiesta~

I agree that it shouldn't be cited, but yeah most schools including mine act like it is the worst source of information anywhere and anyone can come in and write false information.

I'd like to see them add a false fact and see how long it takes for wiki mods to ask them for a source or delete it all together.  psyduck;

Nyerp

Quote from: Commodore Guff on October 01, 2007, 12:36:44 PM
ok

In a perfect world, yes.  But it's more of a compilation of the writers' knowledge rather than that of a digest of reputed sources.  For particularly controversial claims, yes, sources must be used.  But the majority of statements are not backed by references.

But that's also why some articles have notices at the top telling you that it may need to be cleaned up or corrected.

Really what pisses me off is how my teachers constantly rant about the horrible travesty of Wikipedia and how it is polluting our minds with nonsense. My civics teacher went on one day about how the EU is 100% for supporting anti-Wiki procedures.

the hell psyduck;

Selkie

Same here

assholes, I can do a freaking 100 page report using only wiki...

guff

Quote from: Nyerp on October 01, 2007, 12:43:50 PM
But that's also why some articles have notices at the top telling you that it may need to be cleaned up or corrected.

Really what pisses me off is how my teachers constantly rant about the horrible travesty of Wikipedia and how it is polluting our minds with nonsense. My civics teacher went on one day about how the EU is 100% for supporting anti-Wiki procedures.

the hell psyduck;
which also makes it seem reasonable to disallow use of it as a reference

My French teacher liked it, given that it was the only French encyclopedia available to her.  Wasn't very happy when the district blocked access.

the burning fields oh god no survivors psyduck;

Nyerp


~Fiesta~


Nyerp


Wrench

My school is a little less strict about Wiki. It really depends on the topic and teacher.

Some will allow it while others discourage its use.

Nyerp

Quote from: Super Special Awesome Squad on October 01, 2007, 12:55:28 PM
My school ives me the same BS and makes us use these shitty site that they payed for.

Did I mention no Google?

We also have to use a shitty list full of shitty one-purpose sites.

Title27GT


The artist formally known

Wikipedia has sources, use those instead

Also Wikipedia helps me get an A+ in my English class without ever reading a book ever

Go Up